SLEEPERS! Anyone have a street sleeper here?
Discussion
C70R said:
trails said:
C70R said:
It's only "obvious" to the tiny population of car bores.
Pistonheads.com...probably no car bores on that site PH represents a minuscule slither of the population, but so many people here assume that Joe Public thinks the same way they do.
e-honda said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.braddo said:
e-honda said:
trails said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.It’s about 2 inches lower than a standard car. Search Google images of a 1992 civic sedan.
It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.
Good healthy debate. Here's another normal height Honda for you.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...
xcseventy said:
Good healthy debate. Here's another normal height Honda for you.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...
Blanket is a geat touch https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...
trails said:
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.
It's a small picture of a 30 year old car that wasn't the common body style and not a particular common variant.trails said:
Slow said:
Is 2 inches really any more than the suspension would of sagged on a 1992 car?
It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.
U wot m8?!It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.
The car is pristine, but the suspension has been left to sag by two inches?
e-honda said:
trails said:
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.
It's a small picture of a 30 year old car that wasn't the common body style and not a particular common variant.Jimmm said:
I do like thatJimmm said:
Downward tips could be an attempt to reduce the volume, shame they don't sit behind the bumper...must be pretty funny watching it hunker down and fook orf, once the wheels stop spinning of course Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff