SLEEPERS! Anyone have a street sleeper here?

SLEEPERS! Anyone have a street sleeper here?

Author
Discussion

ajprice

27,534 posts

197 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
If I saw that Civic, I wouldn't think it was a 260bhp car, the standard car probably had around half that. It's a sleeper.

PH User

22,154 posts

109 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
ajprice said:
If I saw that Civic, I wouldn't think it was a 260bhp car, the standard car probably had around half that. It's a sleeper.
Agreed.

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
C70R said:
trails said:
C70R said:
It's only "obvious" to the tiny population of car bores.
Pistonheads.com...probably no car bores on that site scratchchin
It's that classic thing of lacking self awareness.

PH represents a minuscule slither of the population, but so many people here assume that Joe Public thinks the same way they do.
I'm not entirely sure you thought that through before typing laugh

Google [bot]

6,682 posts

182 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
O/T one of the best wheel designs ever on those Civics.

e-honda

8,919 posts

147 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
trails said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
e-honda said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.



braddo

10,522 posts

189 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
e-honda said:
trails said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.
It is very obviously lowered.

It’s about 2 inches lower than a standard car. Search Google images of a 1992 civic sedan.

Slow

6,973 posts

138 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
braddo said:
e-honda said:
trails said:
I have no idea if I am looking at the same one or if that is a standard one to compare.
It is very obviously lowered.

It’s about 2 inches lower than a standard car. Search Google images of a 1992 civic sedan.
Is 2 inches really any more than the suspension would of sagged on a 1992 car?

It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Slow said:
Is 2 inches really any more than the suspension would of sagged on a 1992 car?

It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.
U wot m8?!

The car is pristine, but the suspension has been left to sag by two inches?

wpa1975

8,844 posts

115 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
ajprice said:
If I saw that Civic, I wouldn't think it was a 260bhp car, the standard car probably had around half that. It's a sleeper.
Yep, spot on you would not expect this car to have that much power

xcseventy

394 posts

77 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Good healthy debate. Here's another normal height Honda for you.


https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...

wpa1975

8,844 posts

115 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Lots of people lower cars, as I said you would not expect that to have that much power, gets my vote as a sleeper.

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
xcseventy said:
Good healthy debate. Here's another normal height Honda for you.


https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234606951749?hash=item3...
Blanket is a geat touch smile

e-honda

8,919 posts

147 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
trails said:
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.
It's a small picture of a 30 year old car that wasn't the common body style and not a particular common variant.

Jimmm

2,504 posts

184 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all


240bhp Volkswagen Fox. Just a hacksaw to the exhaust tips away from a good sleeper

C70R

17,596 posts

105 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
trails said:
Slow said:
Is 2 inches really any more than the suspension would of sagged on a 1992 car?

It’s not obviously low, just looks worn out.
U wot m8?!

The car is pristine, but the suspension has been left to sag by two inches?
Isn't there a Sudoku somewhere that needs your attention?

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
e-honda said:
trails said:
It's one of the photos from the ebay ad...it surprises me that you cannot see that is lowered, I'm not sure many 92/92 Honda's (or anything remotely vanilla of that time) had no arch gap.
It's a small picture of a 30 year old car that wasn't the common body style and not a particular common variant.
Isn't that the point here...a vanilla car from that period would have had some pretty impressive arch gaps, this is just such a car and those gaps are absent.

biggbn

23,448 posts

221 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Jimmm said:


240bhp Volkswagen Fox. Just a hacksaw to the exhaust tips away from a good sleeper
I do like that

trails

3,726 posts

150 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Jimmm said:


240bhp Volkswagen Fox. Just a hacksaw to the exhaust tips away from a good sleeper
Downward tips could be an attempt to reduce the volume, shame they don't sit behind the bumper...must be pretty funny watching it hunker down and fook orf, once the wheels stop spinning of course biggrin

ajprice

27,534 posts

197 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Jimmm said:


240bhp Volkswagen Fox. Just a hacksaw to the exhaust tips away from a good sleeper
thumbup