RE: BMW M6 Gran Coupe: review

RE: BMW M6 Gran Coupe: review

Author
Discussion

MX7

7,902 posts

175 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
MrTappets said:
Be interested to see (ignoring the price different) how the new Rapide S stacks up to this in terms of dynamics and comfort.
I think the Rapide costs a fair bit more. I think I'd wait for the new Ghibli.

Gavlar83

29 posts

144 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Looks absolutley huge, longer then a 7 series?

seems more of a marketing tool to sell more 'm' sport 6 series diesels as theyll no doubt look identical to this bar a few less vents. shame M seem to be going this way but i guess demand is there for it. Wonder how many will actuall be seen on british roads tho....

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

232 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Lovely looking car, but nearly 2 ton come on BMW you can do better than that.

Mattygooner

5,301 posts

205 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Hmm, looks ok, i am sure it is a fantastic car, but it's not an M Car, can BMW just create another brand so it is not diluted?

Who buys and M car for comfort?

Kawasicki

13,091 posts

236 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
This review reminds me of Bentley reviews, where there isn't much comment on the handling, besides a quick mention that it feels heavy and unwilling to change direction.

Shouldn't the road tester have a shot at checking what the handling is like?

Benjaminbopper

143 posts

170 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Any car with 560hp, rwd and a big v8 is good news in my book.

It may be branded incorrectly but who cares, the automotive melting pot is a better place for it.

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
This is a wonderful car. It's fast, good-looking and will be a great drive. It doesn't pretend to be an M3. It's dangerously expensive though. If I were looking at this, I'd probably be looking at a year old Rapide too.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Zod said:
This is a wonderful car. It's fast, good-looking and will be a great drive. .
Have you seen one in real life or driven it? It is fast.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
I don't agree with the basic premise of this article. After all, what is an "M car" anyway other than "whatever BMW decide it is"??

This whole "M car" mythology seems to revolve around a few old M3's from days gone by. I don't buy this. These cars were good, but probably overrated.

The M6 gran coupe seems like a fine car to me. It makes the Aston Rapide seem old.

RenesisEvo

3,615 posts

220 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
As much as I do admire the 6er Gran Coupe, as the first poster said, there seems little reason to chose an M6 over the 640d.

It strikes me that 'M' has gone the way of AMG - once upon a time, these tuning houses were about the most-focused, driver-engaging, maximum performance versions in the range, with one eye on motorsport activities. Dragged kicking and screaming in-house, now they seem to have been reduced to a badge that merely indicates the ticking of a box on the options list that adds blingey wheels and bodykit, rock hard suspension and a bit more ooomph for bragging rights. Think of the corruption of Audi 'S' cars with 'S-line', in the same way Mercedes have diluted AMG, and BMW blurring the boundaries between M Sport and M car (M135i a strong case in point).

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Zod said:
This is a wonderful car. It's fast, good-looking and will be a great drive. .
Have you seen one in real life or driven it? It is fast.
No, I haven't yet driven it. Yes, I have seen it. You think it will be less good to drive than the M5 perhaps?

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Zod said:
No, I haven't yet driven it. Yes, I have seen it. You think it will be less good to drive than the M5 perhaps?
The M5 seems complete - the M6, for me, falls between two stools. At £100k, I'd want better looks/badge. And this car will depreciate fast and although it starts off at a higher price to the M5, I see used values at similar levels within a short while.

2 tonnes, a lot of weight to work with as an M car.


Edited by Mermaid on Monday 22 April 14:02

gazchap

1,523 posts

184 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
this car will depreciate fast and although it starts off at a higher price to the M5, I see used values at similar levels within a short while.
Same thing happened with the E60 M5 and E63 M6, no? I seem to remember that the M6 was considerably more expensive than the M5 when new, yet you can pick them up for more or less the same price on the used market these days.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
gazchap said:
Mermaid said:
this car will depreciate fast and although it starts off at a higher price to the M5, I see used values at similar levels within a short while.
Same thing happened with the E60 M5 and E63 M6, no? I seem to remember that the M6 was considerably more expensive than the M5 when new, yet you can pick them up for more or less the same price on the used market these days.
Exactly, the market is the ultimate arbiter.

cerb4.5lee

30,724 posts

181 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
I think my M3 is overweight so I would imagine that feels like its carrying its weight at least it's has decent power/torque to give it some serious go, if I had the cash I wouldn't say no. (wish it was a manual though)

mikEsprit

828 posts

187 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
I haven't seen one in person, but in the pics it doesn't look cooler than a 2-door M6. Not even close.

unpc

2,837 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
hussein said:
That interior is pretty lush!



But yes, not exactly motorsport is it? Exactly as Schnellmann says, what exactly does this have to offer over a diesel one? The price though, £25k more than an M5... crikey. I guess the reality is this car is for people where the price is mostly irrelevant.

Edited by hussein on Monday 22 April 11:00
Is it just me, but the asymmetry of that IP just looks wrong. I couldn't live with that.

Dryce

310 posts

133 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
unpc said:
Is it just me, but the asymmetry of that IP just looks wrong. I couldn't live with that.
6er interior is a fine place to be. The 6 GC interior is better IMO than the CLS or the Panamera.

The photograph isn't from a perspective that most people would see it.

MrTappets

881 posts

192 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Only 2 pages of comments but 900 votes and a 0.4 average? What's going on here? That score must make it officially one of the great automotive crimes of recent memory, according to popular opinion. Even if it's not worth an M badge, it's surely a very good car by most measures.

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
MX7 said:
MrTappets said:
Be interested to see (ignoring the price different) how the new Rapide S stacks up to this in terms of dynamics and comfort.
I think the Rapide costs a fair bit more. I think I'd wait for the new Ghibli.
It's a QP rival more than a Ghibli rival, notwithstanding the size difference.

The Rapide S will definitely cost you more, but there are good deals to be had at the moment.