For the people that moan about electric turbos on ebay...

For the people that moan about electric turbos on ebay...

Author
Discussion

John_S4x4

1,350 posts

258 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
http://raceenginedesign.biz/Manic-Beattie.htm

Manic Beattie has an interesting boost system

Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
hman said:
Whatever, the guy before talked of a "supercharger" requiring huge forces -hence why I was talking about the difference between the commonly accepted usage of the word super charger in the context of cars with scrolls and or twin screws (not a turbo) and an EDF.
whether you use scrolls, screws, EDFs or lots of bike pumps, you need 10s of HP to provide reasonable boost for a typical car engine. More if you use something with crap efficiency.

Monty Python

4,812 posts

198 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Face for Radio said:
Leaf-blowers in the intake have been proven to work. Bit impractical though. There's a video online of some yanks doing it with some sort of horrible music dubbed over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbGWgvJN1_8&list=HL1375195687&feature=mh_lolz

Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
hman said:
For all your regurgitations you still haven't worked out if an edf with 11 lbs of thrust would work as a turbo charger have you..
The problem is, you need power to compress air, not force. It's like asking if a car with a 1000lbft engine can do 100mph! (ie, not necessarily!). However, at a guess your 11lbf EDF is probably 10 - 20% of the size needed

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
I worked it out once - IIRC it was around 10 kw.

The maths is easy : p = fv, f= pressure x area. So for the hypothetical 3 litre, imagine feeding it at 7 psi boost through a 4" diameter inlet. Force is 7 * pi * 4 pounds, velocity is airflow / area, airflow = capacity * revs (scaled to whatever units).
So power required is proportional to boost and revs, which is logical.

I did it in SI units to make the maths easier, but I cbf doing the maths at this time of night (on my side of the world).


Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,279 posts

201 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
You need to spin a fan extremely fast before it becomes a compressor.

hman

7,487 posts

195 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Anyway Nitrous is soooo much cheaper and wayyy easier to retro fit.

kambites

67,634 posts

222 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
hman said:
kambites said:
It's not the volume at atmospheric pressure that makes those things rather unviable, it's the volume at significant pressure.

As for how much, well a 3 litre four-stroke engine will have a swept capacity of 1500cc per revolution; say 6000rpm peak = 100 hz = 150 litres per second N/A. If you want to get 1 bar of boost, you'd need to add another 150 litres per second under pressure.
4st engine is only sucking in the air on every alternate stroke ..

http://www.centralturbos.com/pop-werks5a.htm
Every fourth stroke, which is ever other revolution (which is what I used in my calculation).

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 30th July 17:19

J4CKO

41,680 posts

201 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Are we forgetting that this acts as the warm up man, at lower engine speeds to fill in while the main turbo starts doing its thing.

My thinking is that the engine doesnt need as much air at lower engine speeds, as this filling in at the low end is covered by the electric blower the main turbo can be bigger as it isnt needing to be as much of a compromise in terms of size.

Also the ariticle says it needs a change to 48 volt electrics to become a reality.

Could work quite well in a hybrid application as all the battery stuff is there.

kambites

67,634 posts

222 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Are we forgetting that this acts as the warm up man, at lower engine speeds to fill in while the main turbo starts doing its thing.
I read it as being a combat for lag rather than boost threshold (well, maybe both), in which case it needs to work at all engine speeds.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 30th July 17:39

buggalugs

9,243 posts

238 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Provides just enough to start the real turbo spooling off idle and needs 48V electrics, how rubbish, they just need one of the PC fan kits of ebay clearly.

jamieduff1981

8,029 posts

141 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
hman said:
scarble said:
hman said:
4st engine is only sucking in the air on every alternate stroke ..
http://www.centralturbos.com/pop-werks5a.htm
Which is why he says 1.5l per cycle from a 3l engine smash

hman said:
The electric ducted fan is a turbine in a shroud not a supercharger compressor (ie a scroll or twin screw setup)
No it's not, a turbine is a device which is worked upon by a fluid to produce mechanical work, a ducted fan is a device which uses mechanical work to produce work upon a fluid. smash

A typical turbocharger compressor is actually a radial flow or centrifugal compressor (so neither a scroll or twin screw which granted are typical mechanically driven supercharger configurations)
But axial flow compressors are not used (queue someone coming up with some weird concept from the 50s to make me look silly) although there have been murmurs of axial turbines (as opposed to the typical radial flow ones used in cars) (I think they work better for very low flows or something?).
Whatever, the guy before talked of a "supercharger" requiring huge forces -hence why I was talking about the difference between the commonly accepted usage of the word super charger in the context of cars with scrolls and or twin screws (not a turbo) and an EDF.

For all your regurgitations you still haven't worked out if an edf with 11 lbs of thrust would work as a turbo charger have you..

Pop that in your Wikipedia pipe and smoke it.
I'm pretty familiar with EDF too. I've yet to see an 11lb thrust installation running on 12v or 3S LiPo in modern electric model speak. You'd be using more like 10 to 12S packs (so 40+ volts minimum) and still be be pulling over 50A.

Also, if you know EDF you'll know that ducting is critical and they are extremely sensitive to changes in cross sectional area. Choke down the efflux much more than 70ish% give or take and you simply stall the fan, not compress the air behind it.

A ducted fan can accelerate air at a relatively constant pressure - infact it relies on the incompressibile preferences of air to work at all.

To overfill piston engine cylinders you either need a centrifugal compressor or a positive displacement pump such as a screw or roots type compressor.


jamieduff1981

8,029 posts

141 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
hman said:
scarble said:
hman said:
4st engine is only sucking in the air on every alternate stroke ..
http://www.centralturbos.com/pop-werks5a.htm
Which is why he says 1.5l per cycle from a 3l engine smash

hman said:
The electric ducted fan is a turbine in a shroud not a supercharger compressor (ie a scroll or twin screw setup)
No it's not, a turbine is a device which is worked upon by a fluid to produce mechanical work, a ducted fan is a device which uses mechanical work to produce work upon a fluid. smash

A typical turbocharger compressor is actually a radial flow or centrifugal compressor (so neither a scroll or twin screw which granted are typical mechanically driven supercharger configurations)
But axial flow compressors are not used (queue someone coming up with some weird concept from the 50s to make me look silly) although there have been murmurs of axial turbines (as opposed to the typical radial flow ones used in cars) (I think they work better for very low flows or something?).
Whatever, the guy before talked of a "supercharger" requiring huge forces -hence why I was talking about the difference between the commonly accepted usage of the word super charger in the context of cars with scrolls and or twin screws (not a turbo) and an EDF.

For all your regurgitations you still haven't worked out if an edf with 11 lbs of thrust would work as a turbo charger have you..

Pop that in your Wikipedia pipe and smoke it.
I'm pretty familiar with EDF too. I've yet to see an 11lb thrust installation running on 12v or 3S LiPo in modern electric model speak. You'd be using more like 10 to 12S packs (so 40+ volts minimum) and still be be pulling over 50A.

Also, if you know EDF you'll know that ducting is critical and they are extremely sensitive to changes in cross sectional area. Choke down the efflux much more than 70ish% give or take and you simply stall the fan, not compress the air behind it.

A ducted fan can accelerate air at a relatively constant pressure - infact it relies on the incompressibile preferences of air to work at all.

To overfill piston engine cylinders you either need a centrifugal compressor or a positive displacement pump such as a screw or roots type compressor.


205alive

6,087 posts

177 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
What if you had a bottle of liquid oxygen with an EDF plumbed into the intake manifold? So as you floor it, the O2 valve opens as soon as the EDF spins up to speed, chucking compressed O2 down the inlet?

Mave

8,209 posts

216 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
205alive said:
What if you had a bottle of liquid oxygen with an EDF plumbed into the intake manifold? So as you floor it, the O2 valve opens as soon as the EDF spins up to speed, chucking compressed O2 down the inlet?
So what's the EDF doing for you? If you've got pressurised Lox in a bottle, you don't need an EDF getting in the way :-(

205alive

6,087 posts

177 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Making a blend of air and O2 rather than pure O2. But seeing as it's all hypothetical, you can build yours without, see if I care.

varsas

4,014 posts

203 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
Face for Radio said:
Leaf-blowers in the intake have been proven to work. Bit impractical though. There's a video online of some yanks doing it with some sort of horrible music dubbed over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbGWgvJN1_8&list=HL1375195687&feature=mh_lolz
Good video.

Fairly thorough video about supercharging a car with leaf blowers. It does work, to a degree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U81_0waqEWA

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
This sounds only one step from a hybrid turbo setup, why not go the whole hog?

(Apart from the fact that, as I've just discovered, the design is patented.)

mike9009

7,041 posts

244 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
Modern turbos spin at in excess of 200,000rpm.

The ebay 'electric' turbos do not spin anywhere near that speed, hence why they do not work. Thatt s why the need for 48Volts and something which is more engineered than a food mixer.


New POD

3,851 posts

151 months

Tuesday 30th July 2013
quotequote all
There are better ways of reusing kinetic energy

http://flybridsystems.com/