RE: Porsche 911 Turbo S: UK drive

RE: Porsche 911 Turbo S: UK drive

Author
Discussion

delays

786 posts

216 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
£140k seems obscene until you play with the Bank of England's inflation calculator and realise that every Turbo throughout the years has cost today's equivalent (roughly) of £120-140k. Lest we forget, a decent Golf is north of £20k these days.

Not that this makes the upwards creep of prices excusable, of course.

Still think the car looks incredible. Porsche really have the 991 generation nailed, I can see where all those Cayenne profits are being spent!

GRBF430F1

4,843 posts

171 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Vey capable car no doubt but far too expensive and rear arches look square and like a pair of saddle bags.

Bit of a Sally Gunnell, not very pretty looking but fast

blueSL

614 posts

227 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
The issue for turbos has always been much higher levels of depreciation - both in absolute and percentage terms - and I doubt this will be any different. My 997 turbo has halved in value and has not yet hit 20k miles. The other issue is driver involvement or lack of it. It's good to hear this one may be different but mine doesn't come into its own until well over the legal speed limit.

DT398

1,745 posts

149 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
delays said:
£140k seems obscene until you play with the Bank of England's inflation calculator and realise that every Turbo throughout the years has cost today's equivalent (roughly) of £120-140k. Lest we forget, a decent Golf is north of £20k these days.

Not that this makes the upwards creep of prices excusable, of course.

Still think the car looks incredible. Porsche really have the 991 generation nailed, I can see where all those Cayenne profits are being spent!
Yes, the upward creep of pricing is annoying. I was lucky enough to buy a new 997 Turbo S cab in late 2010 and three years later the new one is going to be 12-15% more expensive with options. The pound had already tanked against the euro by then, so it can't be that and you can bet that Porsche has some internal target to make the build costs of every 991 x% lower than the equivalent 997 so I don't believe they are doing anything other than pricing to see what the market will stand. If nobody bites, they will have some room for discount and they certainly had to do that to shift the early 991 cars. Only time will tell, I suppose.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
In an age when the new Ferraris seem almost too technical, too fast and too expensive, this seems like a good car, capable of much the same thing, at a reasonably sensible price. Not that such prices have any reality for people like me but I can say that I would like this car and have never ever coveted a GTR.
Probably end up buying one of these at some stage. The high price will be forgotten soon, but the greatness of the car will be enjoyed for ever.

mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
to quote

"Turbo S is very broad around the hips, wider than the old car and yet to drive it feels narrower because of this new steering system. I think it's a complete revelation and especially useful for the narrow roads we have in the UK. "


how does rear steering make it better on uk B roads ?, a tractor coming the other way, or for that matter another 911 Turbo, rear steering is not going to make the road wider to let each pass !!!!

o well, it's fast and it's expensive, so it will sell well.

g7jhp

6,967 posts

239 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
"after a week I was looking back at it after every drive. In that respect it's much more like the old 996 Turbo I used to run."

Interesting I've heard a few people say the 996 turbo is more involving than the 997 turbo. I'm still looking forward to finding out for myself!

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
At the price levels this Porsche is reaching, I would find it impossible not to get a barely used McLaren 12C for the same money. Unless some rear seats are essential, of course, in which case the Porsche is in a class of one for your £150k.



Mr Whippy

29,049 posts

242 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
I used to really like the 911 Turbo but it really has got rather ugly these days.

On the other hand the latest Boxster has really grown up now and looks great, better than ever I think.


So Porsche have pushed the 911 into the GT camp more, made it a bit ugly, and left the Boxster and Cayman a place to take up their super-sports car mantle?!

I can see a Boxster or Cayman Turbo model in the coming years that really goes for that mid-range super sports car type market again, rather than moving the 911 into what seems like SL/XK/6 series type territory.

Dave

disco666

233 posts

147 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
At the price levels this Porsche is reaching, I would find it impossible not to get a barely used McLaren 12C for the same money. Unless some rear seats are essential, of course, in which case the Porsche is in a class of one for your £150k.
DBS?
Conti GT?

Not 100% familiar with current pricing, but they can't be far off.

The Porsche may be the fastest all weather car for the money, but its just not special enough, compared to the above, and others.

cayman-black

12,648 posts

217 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Agree with the last three posts. 458 ferrari money, i am sure it will be faster but the other cars mentioned are all more special imo.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
disco666 said:
DBS?
Conti GT?

Not 100% familiar with current pricing, but they can't be far off.

The Porsche may be the fastest all weather car for the money, but its just not special enough, compared to the above, and others.
Good point. Well made.

A Conti Speed is a very different kind of car, but you would definitely feel you were getting more value for your money. Aston too.

RichardD

3,560 posts

246 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
...Turbo...
Which would no doubt be quite a beast after installation of a hybrid turbo and appropriate map!

(Private joke)

magic torch

5,781 posts

223 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Why the frequent negative comments about UK roads? I lived in Germany for five years and their roads were fking st. Belgium was even worse...

British Beef

2,219 posts

166 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
disco666 said:
toppstuff said:
At the price levels this Porsche is reaching, I would find it impossible not to get a barely used McLaren 12C for the same money. Unless some rear seats are essential, of course, in which case the Porsche is in a class of one for your £150k.
DBS?
Conti GT?

.
Absolutely agree a Mclaren would be mine for this sort of money - if I wanted a supercar to drive daily.

The DBS can now be had from around £80k with manual, NA V12 and +2 seating - more of a GT but so much more special than any 911.

The GT3 seems the pick of the 991 range to me for road & track! - unless you need 4wd & +2 seating - and warp factor 9 without trying!

FRA53R

1,077 posts

169 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Another good write up Mr Harris. The car looks stunning, but I can't help but feel the new generation of 911's all look a bit too big. The price is high as well but it's doubtful that anything at around that price would be much faster on normal roads, and for some it is the only option, as it does so much so well.

O/T:

The comment about using the inflation calculator to see what each generation cost in relation to current values, was illuminating, especially the bit about decent golfs costing 20k+ apparently the MK1 gti cost the equivalent of 26,334 in 1975!

framerateuk

2,733 posts

185 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Lovely looking thing, no doubt it shifts too! I struggle to think of the 911 as a "supercar" though. More of a sports car you can use every day. But I'd struggle to justify owning one of these for anything other than bragging rights. I just don't think you could exploit the performance very often, and how many people will actually track one?

Edited by framerateuk on Monday 7th October 16:42

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Hmmm 4WD... This means I can get rid of the old Shogun.. :-)

av185

18,514 posts

128 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Very capable car, probably too efficient and quick for its own good. True nuclear detachment for sure! The main photo in blue does rather make it look like a look like a Cayman though.....

Definitely too expensive and will tank like previous turbines when the glitter wears off. GT3 is more appealing and expensive enough.

Love 911s but would prefer a lightly used 458 or Mc for that money.


Frimley111R

15,676 posts

235 months

Monday 7th October 2013
quotequote all
Blimey, how 'average' does it look in that main pic (blue car)?? For the money I'd want a lot more wow factor!