Re: Charles Morgan fights back

Re: Charles Morgan fights back

Author
Discussion

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
Raph C said:
Only one thing is certain:

Charles Morgan is better at PR than those who have ousted him.
Unfortunately he doesn't demonstrate himself to be a very prudent businessman. The chances of reinstatement are minimal yet his negative PR is damaging a company in which he owns a one third share. Not very bright.

Cutting off his nose to spite his face, you might say.

stain

1,051 posts

211 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
northandy said:
I think frimley111 was wondering why you would be worried about the MD being ousted, if your car is just going into build. They will carry on building cars (in the short term at least, unless the removal is signifying some change to future direction)

Stick it in readers cars when it arrives as I'm sure lots will want to see it, me included.
I'm concerned because I am about to spend 40k with a company which is going through a huge change. Up until now Charles Morgan IS the company and his enthusiasm for the brand is infectious.

However, there have been a few hiccups in my ordering process. My car is one of 50 limited editions and I requested a particular build number. No problem sir but that'll be 500 quid!!

This tells me that this spat between CM and whoever is about money and nothing else.

Bebee

4,682 posts

226 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
I'm in a family run business and have been since 1980, all I can say is that there are two side to every tale. There is a reason why they want him out.

sammi

70 posts

248 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all

[/quote]

Unfortunately he doesn't demonstrate himself to be a very prudent businessman. The chances of reinstatement are minimal yet his negative PR is damaging a company in which he owns a one third share. Not very bright.

Cutting off his nose to spite his face, you might say.

[/quote]

Agreed...and ordering a whole load of BMW engines without consulting the board, plus other financial 'foot in mouth' moments !

DonkeyApple

55,556 posts

170 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
Bebee said:
I'm in a family run business and have been since 1980, all I can say is that there are two side to every tale. There is a reason why they want him out.
Yup. And usually just the one cause. Money.

Sometimes issues arrive when a new wife does.

Edited by DonkeyApple on Saturday 19th October 17:59

StraightShooter

23 posts

127 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
stain said:
I'm concerned because I am about to spend 40k with a company which is going through a huge change. Up until now Charles Morgan IS the company and his enthusiasm for the brand is infectious.
I agree. As someone pointed out on the Telegraph, the shareholders could not have done this without the two other working managers behind it or pushing it. One of them was handed Charles Morgan's title. Yet he is the one who is been responsible for the quality problems. The other guy is the company accountant, in charge of warranty claims. The bean-counters have taken over. Duck.

Edited by StraightShooter on Saturday 19th October 18:57

groomi

9,317 posts

244 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
sammi said:
Unfortunately he doesn't demonstrate himself to be a very prudent businessman. The chances of reinstatement are minimal yet his negative PR is damaging a company in which he owns a one third share. Not very bright.

Cutting off his nose to spite his face, you might say.
Agreed...and ordering a whole load of BMW engines without consulting the board, plus other financial 'foot in mouth' moments !
Is supply chain usually a board decision?

sammi

70 posts

248 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
groomi said:
Is supply chain usually a board decision?
Yes, when it is a major decision, such as stockpiling BMW Engines, which then commits Morgan to building 100/200 more Aeros !

Edited by sammi on Saturday 19th October 22:47

Strawman

6,463 posts

208 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
It's a bit pointless guessing what the reasons behind this decision were. They build 200 aero supersports a year therefore committing to buy 255 engines doesn't seem outlandish to me, but then I'm not involved in car manufacture.

sammi

70 posts

248 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
Strawman said:
It's a bit pointless guessing what the reasons behind this decision were. They build 200 aero supersports a year therefore committing to buy 255 engines doesn't seem outlandish to me, but then I'm not involved in car manufacture.
Actually No ! They were NOT planning on building 200 Aeros !!

Zingari

904 posts

174 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
Wasn't he supposed to be bringing out a DVD thismonth of his 3-wheel jaunt across the US?

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
sammi said:
Actually No ! They were NOT planning on building 200 Aeros !!
They were planning on building only Traddies and 3 wheelers?

mikebradford

2,528 posts

146 months

Saturday 19th October 2013
quotequote all
Zingari said:
Wasn't he supposed to be bringing out a DVD thismonth of his 3-wheel jaunt across the US?
its on the gumball 3000 site
nicely filmed as well

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7L_2IcAMxec

Edited by mikebradford on Sunday 20th October 00:03

bobberz

1,832 posts

200 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
ayseven said:
I had the pleasure of meeting his dad, and had a nice tour of the factory back in the 70's. Do not underestimate having a Morgan as head of a small, specialised manufacturer. The brand is dependent upon the quirky, old fashioned look to the enterprise. But hey, it is their outfit, and they can run it into the ground if they want to.

He probably knows something about what is happening in the industry, that prompted him to want to expand in other areas, beyond the 'handmade British cars, designed yesterday, and built today'.
hehe

That made me laugh (and I'm a huge Morgan fan; I must own at least one in my lifetime).


FER4L

122 posts

161 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Plus eleventytwelve; a proper 24ct, 5 star, polychromatic, diamond-encrusted, spinning bow-tie extravaganza of a PR clusterfk.
Does that mean not good? smile

AER

1,142 posts

271 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
A good friend of mine, who is not a petrol head but has a lifetime of board membership, shareholding, MDship and expensive legal disputes behind him, told me his opinion as follows (not verbatim)

If CM doesn't have any NDA or non-compete clause in his employment contract, he should firstly go after the company for unfair dismissal. Secondly, he should found the New Morgan Motor Company (or similar) and make a public announcement seeking financial backing from the Morgan owners and enthusiasts, perhaps offering share options for people who cancel their refundable orders with MMCL - basically attempt to trash the MMCL order book. With any luck this should put enough stress on the MMCL/MTL board as well as make a large dent in their cash position. At some point with sales heading south and enough bad will floating around towards the board, MMCL will be looking decidedly ropey. Then CM could raise enough capital and finance to buy out MMCL and reacquire the name/rights/designs/premises to continue where he left off, but with a controlling interest in the company.

FWIW...

Bebee

4,682 posts

226 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
FER4L said:
hidetheelephants said:
Plus eleventytwelve; a proper 24ct, 5 star, polychromatic, diamond-encrusted, spinning bow-tie extravaganza of a PR clusterfk.
Does that mean not good? smile
In a phlexidermirexamite kind of way.

LordPetroleum

371 posts

171 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
AER said:
A good friend of mine, who is not a petrol head but has a lifetime of board membership, shareholding, MDship and expensive legal disputes behind him, told me his opinion as follows (not verbatim)

If CM doesn't have any NDA or non-compete clause in his employment contract, he should firstly go after the company for unfair dismissal. Secondly, he should found the New Morgan Motor Company (or similar) and make a public announcement seeking financial backing from the Morgan owners and enthusiasts, perhaps offering share options for people who cancel their refundable orders with MMCL - basically attempt to trash the MMCL order book. With any luck this should put enough stress on the MMCL/MTL board as well as make a large dent in their cash position. At some point with sales heading south and enough bad will floating around towards the board, MMCL will be looking decidedly ropey. Then CM could raise enough capital and finance to buy out MMCL and reacquire the name/rights/designs/premises to continue where he left off, but with a controlling interest in the company.

FWIW...
Nice, very 'wall street'. Alternatively I guess they could all shuffle off in to a quiet room and sort their differences out rather than airing their dirty laundry in public. Queensbury rules anyone...............?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
LordPetroleum said:
Nice, very 'wall street'. Alternatively I guess they could all shuffle off in to a quiet room and sort their differences out rather than airing their dirty laundry in public. Queensbury rules anyone...............?
probably a bit late for that....?

StraightShooter

23 posts

127 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
LordPetroleum said:
Nice, very 'wall street'. Alternatively I guess they could all shuffle off in to a quiet room and sort their differences out rather than airing their dirty laundry in public. Queensbury rules anyone...............?
probably a bit late for that....?
Queensbury rules are not something that Charles Morgan has ever had the time for. Yet he has used fisticuffs in the boardroom on occasion. Volatile guy. Nothing like his elegant father and grandfather. Last time they all tried to get rid of him, he threatened the family and the directors with criminal actions and lawsuits. This time they are not backing down, so far. Let's see what happens in Court next Friday. I smell a minority shareholder searching for a big payoff.

He is simply too unpredictable for the company to afford. Loose cannon. And as long as he is presented as a part of the company, in any capacity, he has the ability to bind it legally and very painfully. The millions in BMW engines is only one example.

No current family member has any automobile or business training. Charles Morgan is a TV cameraman for Heaven's sake! So if 70% of his family and his two co-managers think he has to go, we can assume they were forced to that decision. The present public antics of him and his wife give us a taste of what the family have been putting up with for years. Distasteful.




Edited by StraightShooter on Sunday 20th October 23:19