RE: VW Golf GTI vs BMW M135i vs Mercedes A45 AMG

RE: VW Golf GTI vs BMW M135i vs Mercedes A45 AMG

Author
Discussion

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
Tickle said:
GTI + Caterham 160
cloud9

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
Tickle said:
GTI + Caterham 160
cloud9
I think I'd rather have a Ceed GT and a Caterham with a proper engine. biggrin

Shurv

964 posts

161 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
+1 for the Caterham ,and a daily with the change.

Doodles19

2,201 posts

174 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
I really don't understand how Toyota can justify their pricing of the GT86.

Add a few bits and bobs to it, and its a £28k car. Yet its lacking about 130bhp over the BMW.

I bet the resale on the BMW will be better as well.

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
For some people, power is not a major factor in how much a car is worth. If you really don't understand that, I'd imagine a lot of cars don't make much sense to you. hehe

Doodles19

2,201 posts

174 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
For some people, power is not a major factor in how much a car is worth. If you really don't understand that, I'd imagine a lot of cars don't make much sense to you. hehe
Of course I understand its not ALL about power.

However, when I drove the GT86 I felt it was holding onto gears that little bit too long. It handled fantastically, but the power issue would bug me and I fear it would ruin the overall experience of ownership.

It would be fine if the GT86's deficit was sub 50bhp. But 130bhp+ really does change things. As does the the ZF 8 speed box and the option of an LSD now.

I'd be struggling to justify choosing a GT86 over an M135i, considering they are nigh exactly the same amounts of money.

Plus the M135i is more practical.

HighwayStar

4,313 posts

145 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
V8A*ndy said:
How come it's a lot cheaper in other markets around the world and I'm making a direct comparison with spun off platforms In those markets which are also a lot cheaper.

It's a GB thing. Even the motoring press expected 4-5k less.
You need to take a look at a lot of other cars for sale in others countries. In US they think they pay a lot for European cars, most cars are cheaper there compared to the UK but... Up in Canada they DO pay a lot more than the US for the same car.
Talk to someone in Scandinavia, you be stunned at what they have to fork out for a car.
As for the press expecting a particular price, since when have the press decided have much a manufacturer is going to charge for a car?

Tickle

4,945 posts

205 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
+1
kambites said:
I think I'd rather have a Ceed GT and a Caterham with a proper engine. biggrin

ChrisG99

18 posts

134 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
<b>"Comprehensively hammering the final nail into the Japanese rally rep coffin, meanwhile, is new arrival to this party, AMG. 180hp per litre from a 2.0-litre four would have been for the committed just a few years back but now comes with a Mercedes badge on the front, four driven wheels, a hatchback body and more youthful swagger than we've ever seen before."</b>.

All three are lovely cars, and I'd happily drive any one of them, but come on, it's 2013. Mitsubishi and Subaru were making cars just as quick almost 15 years ago. I would hope that "final nail" isn't anything to do with power outputs and/or handling capabilities.

I'd still have an Evo IX or X FQ360, or maybe a classic Impreza 22B thank you!

b0rk

2,312 posts

147 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
ChrisG99 said:
Mitsubishi and Subaru were making cars just as quick almost 15 years ago. I would hope that "final nail" isn't anything to do with power outputs and/or handling capabilities.
Both where/are in the ultimate forms modified to achieve the power outputs, admittedly the UK importer did the modifications. In the case of Mitsubishi Evo X the factory power was 300PS with 330/360/400 versions being tuned upon import. Impreza's where either prodrive or cosworth tuned upon import the lower power versions going down the SVA route and higher powered as "post registration modifications" (i.e. unapproved). Try and get a UK Evo or Impreza re-registered in say Germany to understand how modified from approved they are/where.

Evo's never actually went through whole EU vehicle type approval in 330/360/400 trim and the FQ-300 was approved via UK SVA much like a caterham.

Moving the game is on is doing this on full factory backed, type approved vehicle. Most of the current 4-pot 2ltr turbo lumps can be aftermarket tuned to 300+ hp with ease and have been like this for many years.

General Zod

334 posts

132 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
For all the posts like "buy X plus a caterham"- have you ever done this? In my experience you end up with all the running costs and space issues of two cars but spend 95 % of the time in the "more boring" car.

These kind of cars address this fundamental issue to a reasonable degree.

Cacatous

3,164 posts

274 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
The idea is not to see which one is the best car, it's to see which is the best car for *you*.

For some people they'd like to read a obj/subjective review of 3 'similar' cars to ascertain whether they should spend £10k more or less than they budgeted.

Just read the article and enjoy it.

As for those wondering what justifies £26+ for a GT86, consider how long they had to spend testing, fabricating custom parts, crash testing it and then maintaining them. Their sales numbers are expectedly low and for anything low volume, expect to pay more.

elementad

625 posts

151 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
b0rk said:
ChrisG99 said:
Mitsubishi and Subaru were making cars just as quick almost 15 years ago. I would hope that "final nail" isn't anything to do with power outputs and/or handling capabilities.
Both where/are in the ultimate forms modified to achieve the power outputs, admittedly the UK importer did the modifications. In the case of Mitsubishi Evo X the factory power was 300PS with 330/360/400 versions being tuned upon import. Impreza's where either prodrive or cosworth tuned upon import the lower power versions going down the SVA route and higher powered as "post registration modifications" (i.e. unapproved). Try and get a UK Evo or Impreza re-registered in say Germany to understand how modified from approved they are/where.

Evo's never actually went through whole EU vehicle type approval in 330/360/400 trim and the FQ-300 was approved via UK SVA much like a caterham.

Moving the game is on is doing this on full factory backed, type approved vehicle. Most of the current 4-pot 2ltr turbo lumps can be aftermarket tuned to 300+ hp with ease and have been like this for many years.
I don't see how they've "final nail in the coffin" for the jap motors at all.
You can buy a brand new 370z, Naturally aspirated, 328bhp, RWD, factory fitted LSD, jap reliability, bespoke styling, 0-100mph 11.8.
All for a non discounted price of £27k.
I told Dan that with all the M135i stuff that's been flying around recently, surely the most evenly matched bar the seating situation was the 370z. Crazy that it wasn't part of the tests.

The Germans still have some catching up to do unless you class shoving a turbo on the engine and piping noise into the cabin innovation.
The only thing they have one over is the fact they have 4 seats (which I don't need) and better economy due to using a turbo.

BrewsterBear

1,507 posts

193 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
The more I read about the A45 the more tempted I become. I've specced "my" car 3 times now, coming out at a snip over £40k. The main sticking point for me right now is that I own both of my cars outright and would need to take some finance to swap my Cayenne Turbo for one of these. I've avoided my local Merc dealer for the last few months because I can't see how I'd leave without placing an order.

J4CKO

41,679 posts

201 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
elementad said:
b0rk said:
ChrisG99 said:
Mitsubishi and Subaru were making cars just as quick almost 15 years ago. I would hope that "final nail" isn't anything to do with power outputs and/or handling capabilities.
Both where/are in the ultimate forms modified to achieve the power outputs, admittedly the UK importer did the modifications. In the case of Mitsubishi Evo X the factory power was 300PS with 330/360/400 versions being tuned upon import. Impreza's where either prodrive or cosworth tuned upon import the lower power versions going down the SVA route and higher powered as "post registration modifications" (i.e. unapproved). Try and get a UK Evo or Impreza re-registered in say Germany to understand how modified from approved they are/where.

Evo's never actually went through whole EU vehicle type approval in 330/360/400 trim and the FQ-300 was approved via UK SVA much like a caterham.

Moving the game is on is doing this on full factory backed, type approved vehicle. Most of the current 4-pot 2ltr turbo lumps can be aftermarket tuned to 300+ hp with ease and have been like this for many years.
I don't see how they've "final nail in the coffin" for the jap motors at all.
You can buy a brand new 370z, Naturally aspirated, 328bhp, RWD, factory fitted LSD, jap reliability, bespoke styling, 0-100mph 11.8.
All for a non discounted price of £27k.
I told Dan that with all the M135i stuff that's been flying around recently, surely the most evenly matched bar the seating situation was the 370z. Crazy that it wasn't part of the tests.

The Germans still have some catching up to do unless you class shoving a turbo on the engine and piping noise into the cabin innovation.
The only thing they have one over is the fact they have 4 seats (which I don't need) and better economy due to using a turbo.
I think people get scared off the 370Z due to the lack of practicality, VED, thirst and residuals, plus, am not sure what they did to the looks, kind of looks a bit squashed, also. It sure now close it would get to a 135i in performance, on paper probably not far off but would like to see on the road, then the 135i gets a few tweaks and it's all over I have a 350Z and it moves quite well with 300 bhp but the feel I get on it doesn't seem to come any where the hype surrounding the 135i so I guess, that despite having similar power figures the Nissan would get beaten by the BMW, but then I paid seven grand and get something a bit different than a one series.

elementad

625 posts

151 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
elementad said:
b0rk said:
ChrisG99 said:
Mitsubishi and Subaru were making cars just as quick almost 15 years ago. I would hope that "final nail" isn't anything to do with power outputs and/or handling capabilities.
Both where/are in the ultimate forms modified to achieve the power outputs, admittedly the UK importer did the modifications. In the case of Mitsubishi Evo X the factory power was 300PS with 330/360/400 versions being tuned upon import. Impreza's where either prodrive or cosworth tuned upon import the lower power versions going down the SVA route and higher powered as "post registration modifications" (i.e. unapproved). Try and get a UK Evo or Impreza re-registered in say Germany to understand how modified from approved they are/where.

Evo's never actually went through whole EU vehicle type approval in 330/360/400 trim and the FQ-300 was approved via UK SVA much like a caterham.

Moving the game is on is doing this on full factory backed, type approved vehicle. Most of the current 4-pot 2ltr turbo lumps can be aftermarket tuned to 300+ hp with ease and have been like this for many years.
I don't see how they've "final nail in the coffin" for the jap motors at all.
You can buy a brand new 370z, Naturally aspirated, 328bhp, RWD, factory fitted LSD, jap reliability, bespoke styling, 0-100mph 11.8.
All for a non discounted price of £27k.
I told Dan that with all the M135i stuff that's been flying around recently, surely the most evenly matched bar the seating situation was the 370z. Crazy that it wasn't part of the tests.

The Germans still have some catching up to do unless you class shoving a turbo on the engine and piping noise into the cabin innovation.
The only thing they have one over is the fact they have 4 seats (which I don't need) and better economy due to using a turbo.
I think people get scared off the 370Z due to the lack of practicality, VED, thirst and residuals, plus, am not sure what they did to the looks, kind of looks a bit squashed, also. It sure now close it would get to a 135i in performance, on paper probably not far off but would like to see on the road, then the 135i gets a few tweaks and it's all over I have a 350Z and it moves quite well with 300 bhp but the feel I get on it doesn't seem to come any where the hype surrounding the 135i so I guess, that despite having similar power figures the Nissan would get beaten by the BMW, but then I paid seven grand and get something a bit different than a one series.
It (the 370z) is a very different car than the 350, and I reckon manual vs manual (m135i and 370z) they would be very close indeed.
Residuals are nothing but hearsay (and incorrect at that).
Take any year for year, mileage for mileage example of M3s or whatever you like against the 350 or 370 and you'll see the nissans have depreciated same or even less.
I've discussed this to great lengths many a time as a few on here will know.

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
I think the 370Z is a rather odd comparison. Surely no-one buys a 1-series unless they need four seats?

mainaman

414 posts

186 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
Stop slating the A45 as too expensive and implying that the Beemer is a bargain.It is the other way around.To get the M135 close to what a "basic " A45 offers you need to add the autobox and the LSD ,to retrofit M3's front seats and at least Stage 1 engine upgrade.So a 30k car becomes 37k car that is still less bespoke than the factory spec Merc, which can be specified with an optional bodykit that is not available on any other A class.

Oz83

689 posts

140 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
HighwayStar said:
You need to take a look at a lot of other cars for sale in others countries. In US they think they pay a lot for European cars, most cars are cheaper there compared to the UK but... Up in Canada they DO pay a lot more than the US for the same car.
Talk to someone in Scandinavia, you be stunned at what they have to fork out for a car.
This. You guys in the UK have it so good. In Sweden a sensibly specced M135i is about £48k. In Norway, well I hope you are sitting down...



Yep, that's about £87500 :-)

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
mainaman said:
Stop slating the A45 as too expensive and implying that the Beemer is a bargain.It is the other way around.To get the M135 close to what a "basic " A45 offers you need to add the autobox and the LSD ,to retrofit M3's front seats and at least Stage 1 engine upgrade.So a 30k car becomes 37k car that is still less bespoke than the factory spec Merc, which can be specified with an optional bodykit that is not available on any other A class.
I suppose the only way to compare them fairly is to look at the average price paid by actual buyers... which is rather hard to find out.