RE: Porsche LMP1 confirms 4-cyl hybrid

RE: Porsche LMP1 confirms 4-cyl hybrid

Author
Discussion

Jimbo.

3,950 posts

190 months

Thursday 12th December 2013
quotequote all
Fancy tech, Porsche vs. Audi vs. Toyota, Webber at the helm? I'll be paying a LOT more attention to WEC/Le Mans next year. Formula what, y' say?

DanielSan

18,823 posts

168 months

Thursday 12th December 2013
quotequote all
Plenty of 4 pots sound good, if it can sound like this then all is good...

http://youtu.be/GyV141Us2rI

sm34uk

135 posts

151 months

Thursday 12th December 2013
quotequote all
All depends on your HR department, I have a Porsche 911...oh, but I'm the HR Manager

To be fair its normally the Finance department that likes diesel!

Some Gump said:
Wasn't the idea that the "FIA world engine" being valid for WEC, F1 and WRC amongst others? 1 engine architecture with different turbo / cams / valves could be used for a veriety of formulae, making it better for all?

Anyways, although I'm slightly sad that the new pork won't sound like the Aston from 2011, I'm happy to see anything that can take the fight to the Audis. If Porsche are bringing the tech to the street as well - all the better. Although no doubt some posters will be frothing at the mouth at the horrible idea of an inline 4 in a Porsche, I'm excited by the prospet of what thir motorsport activities will being to the road cars.

Off the top of my head...
Sequential turbos
Varioram/ variocam
The Metzger engine
Clever 4wd
Probably the best brakes / ABS on the market for a huge amount of time (993 eta etc)

All of the above were spawned by Porsche's WRC / Le Mans work. If Porsche can make a potent, economical 4 then that's great by me - I'd love a 911 that did 50 MPG, it would really, really piss on the chips of HR when they try to take cars off the "acceptible private cars" list for my company car opt out scheme =)

Clivey

5,112 posts

205 months

Thursday 12th December 2013
quotequote all
Maybe I'm being thick, but why is the VW group allowing Audi and Porsche to compete against one-another? Would it not make more sense to enter them into different classes so that each manufacturer, if successful, can declare "We won!"? confused

Some Gump

12,717 posts

187 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Clivey said:
Maybe I'm being thick, but why is the VW group allowing Audi and Porsche to compete against one-another? Would it not make more sense to enter them into different classes so that each manufacturer, if successful, can declare "We won!"? confused
It's actually a no lose situation, as long as they let them race.

Of porsche win, it's another notch on the most sucessful belt in the history of the event. Audi still get to fight toyota.
If audi win, they get to punt more tdi slines. porsche can accept defeat in a gentlemanly fashion, whilst reminding people that derv is the dominant power due to the rules, but they don't do diesel in sports cars.

Of course, the ts03 might be triumphant, in which case it's a bummer for both smile

VladD

7,868 posts

266 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
If audi win, they get to punt more tdi slines. porsche can accept defeat in a gentlemanly fashion, whilst reminding people that derv is the dominant power due to the rules, but they don't do diesel in sports cars.
According to their advert in Evo, the new Macan is a sports car.

danp

1,603 posts

263 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
CBR JGWRR said:
Nah, its more like a 24 hour sprint than a 24 hour endurance nowadays. What's daft is that F1 is a 1 - 2 hour endurance race...
vgd!

myhandle

1,197 posts

175 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
VladD said:
According to their advert in Evo, the new Macan is a sports car.
Good spot.

TransverseTight

753 posts

146 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
danp said:
vgd!
Actually we are all wrong. It's a 23h45 min sprint. It's visibly noticeable that they have a gentlemanly wind down on the last 2 laps / 15 minutes as they get themselves into position to come over the line together. ;-)

Last year was Audi, Toyota, Audi, Toyota, Audi so there must have been some agreement in the garages not to go full blat till the chequered flag. Was the best race I've seen since, er, 2012 when IIRC Peugeot were 12 seconds behind the lead Audi with less than half hour to go.

This year a lot of our group have dropped out, but there's a few of us have decided to go and watch the race because there's too much going on to miss. Nissan are back with their pocket ZEOD too. When they sponsored the delta wing is wasn't quite up to LMP2 competition speed as it was somewhere near the back, but it was only just behind. So will be interesting to see what 2 years of development will bring.

Will be great to see what Porcshe LMP does at Silverstone so we can look ahead to Le Mans proper. I'm really hoping there's more a mix in the GT class this year. Last years was "only" Ferraris, Porsches, Astons, Corvettes and Chrysler/Dodge. Would like as few less Porsche / Ferrari and a few more Jag / Lambo / Maclarens / GTRs etc.

rufusruffcutt

1,539 posts

206 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
787B was a rotary 4 2616cc and that sounded biblical at full chat.

Daston

6,077 posts

204 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
rufusruffcutt said:
787B was a rotary 4 2616cc and that sounded biblical at full chat.
Yeah the quad rotor engines sound just insane. Its a shame that they never did a race version of the Furi. Although I doubt it would have passed any of the FIA regs or would have had to pit every 3 laps for fuel smile

J-P

4,353 posts

207 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Not all 4 cylinders sounds naff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf_NH8yoCgY

Also - why is it that when we enthusiasts discuss multi-cylinder engines, we aren't including 4 cylinder engines in that description? Surely anything with 2 cylinders or more qualifies as multi-cylinder?

TransverseTight

753 posts

146 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
Talkig about all these engine tyoes... You know what would be cool.. jag getting their twin jet turbine cx75 hybrid into garage 56 wink That would be something new to listen to. wouldnt have to be competitive but a finish somewhere before the GTs woukd be good.
while were at it, get a ducati powered westfield xtr out there and something with the triumph 2.3 litre triple. shoukd have everything covered then. Oh hang on... forgot the 5cyl 2.5 from the ford volvo stable, lol.

chevronb37

6,471 posts

187 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
The problem, to my mind, with the C-X75 is that the (theoretical) turbine noise won't be proportional to throttle position. However, the Howmett is a genuine gas turbine sports car and has appeared at Classic Le Mans in the recent past. As (poorly rendered, I admit) below:


Clivey

5,112 posts

205 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
J-P said:
Not all 4 cylinders sounds naff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf_NH8yoCgY
Of course; you're right. The problem is that most new FI 4-cylinder cars are designed with economy in mind and end-up sounding dull.

J-P said:
Also - why is it that when we enthusiasts discuss multi-cylinder engines, we aren't including 4 cylinder engines in that description? Surely anything with 2 cylinders or more qualifies as multi-cylinder?
hehe Again; can't argue!

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

228 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
TransverseTight said:
Actually we are all wrong. It's a 23h45 min sprint. It's visibly noticeable that they have a gentlemanly wind down on the last 2 laps / 15 minutes as they get themselves into position to come over the line together. ;-)
It certainly wasn't in 2011.

2014 promises to be one of the most exciting sportscar seasons of the modern age, with 2015 looking even more enticing. Will the choice of engine, fuel or number of cylinders effect this? No. Certainly for me, sportscar racing is so much more than that. It will be mightily interesting to see if Porsche get on top of their issues before June, that's for sure.

rogerhudson

338 posts

159 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
chevronb37 said:
The problem, to my mind, with the C-X75 is that the (theoretical) turbine noise won't be proportional to throttle position. However, the Howmett is a genuine gas turbine sports car and has appeared at Classic Le Mans in the recent past. As (poorly rendered, I admit) below:

I love the Howmets Mk1 Ford Cortina rear lights.

chevronb37

6,471 posts

187 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
rogerhudson said:
chevronb37 said:
The problem, to my mind, with the C-X75 is that the (theoretical) turbine noise won't be proportional to throttle position. However, the Howmett is a genuine gas turbine sports car and has appeared at Classic Le Mans in the recent past. As (poorly rendered, I admit) below:

I love the Howmets Mk1 Ford Cortina rear lights.
Like everything from that era!

rogerhudson

338 posts

159 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
Why do so many people witter on about the sound it makes? it's the power and handling that count, plus the reliability.
The 911 as a four cylinder engined car? it's a 912 and a lovely handling light car it is too.
I want to see a very small gas turbine running on LPG at constant rpm powering a high frequency alternator into a control unit that uses a battery as an energy buffer and powering four electric hub motor/brake units.
This hybrid was called a 'mixte' system when Porsche (the Old Professor)worked something similar in 1900.

Dr JonboyG

2,561 posts

240 months

Saturday 14th December 2013
quotequote all
PW said:
Manufacturers exist soley to make and sell cars. PR is a tool to sell more cars. Motorsport is a PR tool that says to people your cars are worth buying because they are the best and can win races because of something the manufacturer has done - either the make/model itself in the case of GT/Touring cars, or some sort of technology the company has developed as in single seater/prototype categories, even if it is tenuous.

If there is no link at all, and motorsport has no value as a PR tool, they might as well spend that money on print/tv advertising, or product placement in films that will get them in front of a much bigger audience than a few thousand motorsport fans.

WEC/Le Mans wouldn't exist without manufacturer support. LMP1 is a defacto manufacturer class. LMP2 is the Nissan class. GTE is mostly factory teams. The manufacturers also put a lot of money into the championship itself, supporting events, logistics, coverage etc.

You'd have something like the Asian LMS/ELMS - maybe 2 dozen cars on a good day at a hand full of races in a season, with barely any coverage. Nothing neccessarily wrong with those series - I enjoy following/watching them as much as anything else, but at very different level in terms of "spectacle".
Some teams pay for motorsport out of their R&D and engineering budgets, not their marketing budgets. Some of these companies can be found in P1.