RE: McLaren 650S: Review

RE: McLaren 650S: Review

Author
Discussion

GarageQueen

2,295 posts

246 months

Wednesday 2nd April 2014
quotequote all
what is it with Mclaren naming policy??? 12C, P1, 650S - all nonsense and no link????

007 VXR

64,187 posts

187 months

Wednesday 2nd April 2014
quotequote all
GarageQueen said:
what is it with Mclaren naming policy??? 12C, P1, 650S - all nonsense and no link????
I cant see the issue here...
Why do you need a link?

355, 360, 430 , 458, LaF, 599, F12, FXX, Enzo, FF

Monty Zoomer

1,459 posts

157 months

Wednesday 2nd April 2014
quotequote all
W8aMinute said:
I think we’re probably just witnessing the learning process that McLaren is going through when it comes to dealing with auto journalists.

With the 12C they found out that regardless of what their empirical measurements said, because it wouldn’t drift easily journalistic groupthink set in and proclaimed that it was a very good car subjectively not quite as good as a 458.

What McLaren have done now is use the old trick of telling the journos that virtually everything on the car has been “tweaked”. Since motoring journalists love nothing more than demonstrating their incredible perceptive skills by claiming that they can tell the difference between a 19mm diameter anti-roll bar and a 20mm one, the 650S press-pack was catnip to them. They can now drive the car and happily pronounce that it’s a “revelation” compared to the 12C even though the quantitative differences are probably negligible...
hehe

Mr Whippy

29,040 posts

241 months

Thursday 3rd April 2014
quotequote all
Carl_Docklands said:
Carlique said:
I'll take a spider in Aurora blue please. Absolutely stunning!
Like.
It looks good when you can't see the sides and back that don't match hehe

jacksparrow11

177 posts

126 months

Thursday 3rd April 2014
quotequote all
probably will never drive one so can't comment on the involvement side of things, but its amazing how this car is only 1 second off the p1 0-100 time, and 1.5 seconds off 0-120 ,the p15 is going to be something else.makes you wonder how much faster supercars will get.

DeltaEvo2

869 posts

192 months

Thursday 3rd April 2014
quotequote all
Dull...

Midgster

571 posts

234 months

Thursday 3rd April 2014
quotequote all
As I work in the Woking area I have seens lots (30+) 12C's (and a few P1's too) and do like the subtlety, but I have just seen my first 650c on the M3 earlier today in a graphite grey colour, and the front end does work so much better in the flesh than in pictures. It did look much more purposeful. I like it.

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

207 months

Friday 4th April 2014
quotequote all
jacksparrow11 said:
probably will never drive one so can't comment on the involvement side of things, but its amazing how this car is only 1 second off the p1 0-100 time, and 1.5 seconds off 0-120 ,the p15 is going to be something else.makes you wonder how much faster supercars will get.
I agree, the performance figures of these Mclarens are scary. It will be interesting if Ferrari,Porsche and Lamborghini join this performance race or just make louder more aesthetically pleasing cars. The Huracan for example is nowhere near the pace of this car.

Mr Whippy

29,040 posts

241 months

Friday 4th April 2014
quotequote all
Just get an Agera R if you want to hurt yourself with accelerative forces biggrin

Kronstein

294 posts

129 months

Monty Zoomer

1,459 posts

157 months

Friday 4th April 2014
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
It will be interesting if Ferrari,Porsche and Lamborghini join this performance race
Join???

E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Friday 4th April 2014
quotequote all
Kronstein said:
Bloody hell, can't get a much more glowing review than that.

ILoveMondeo

9,614 posts

226 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
Cant say I've seen or heard a 12c or 650s other than on t'internet...

but from that video... does anyone else think it sounds just a bit... well... st?

It's really really quiet, inside the cabin you can hear the click of the paddle shifts over the exhaust. Sounds a bit like a bike half a mile away.

Maybe it's just the audio on that video. I'd better go and track one down to hear properly! smile

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
Kronstein said:
Bloody hell, can't get a much more glowing review than that.
A decent video, nicely shot and with lots of information. I must say, I know that Chris Harris was a bit poorly, but he had better pull his finger out and drive the 650S properly - the Sutcliffe video of the 650S is miles, miles, miles better.



E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
E65Ross said:
Kronstein said:
Bloody hell, can't get a much more glowing review than that.
A decent video, nicely shot and with lots of information. I must say, I know that Chris Harris was a bit poorly, but he had better pull his finger out and drive the 650S properly - the Sutcliffe video of the 650S is miles, miles, miles better.
Agreed, was a really good video with lots of good information on how it is to drive as well as some technical information.

PGNTuscan

2,934 posts

166 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
007 VXR said:
I cant see the issue here...
Why do you need a link?

355, 360, 430 , 458, LaF, 599, F12, FXX, Enzo, FF
Those Ferrari designations are not random. Look into it a bit more.

Agree that Mclaren naming is totally daft but at least the 650 references something.

Monty Python

4,812 posts

197 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
PGNTuscan said:
Those Ferrari designations are not random. Look into it a bit more.

Agree that Mclaren naming is totally daft but at least the 650 references something.
It's obvious - it's the engine output in PS.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
PGNTuscan said:
Those Ferrari designations are not random. Look into it a bit more.
On the contrary, I think calling a car " La Ferrari" is probably the most random , idiotic decision in naming a car in automotive history.

PGNTuscan

2,934 posts

166 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
On the contrary, I think calling a car " La Ferrari" is probably the most random , idiotic decision in naming a car in automotive history.
Pay more attention. The La Ferrari is an F70. That's the model designation. Like an Enzo was an F60 and then you know about the F40 and F50.

r1ch

2,872 posts

196 months

Saturday 5th April 2014
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
It looks good when you can't see the sides and back that don't match hehe
Yeah i'm with you on that one. The 650s bugs me because of the front and back mismatch.