RE: Civic Type R seen undisguised

RE: Civic Type R seen undisguised

Author
Discussion

bakerstreet

4,766 posts

166 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Tim16V said:
The German manufactuers have 'subtly menancing' down to a fine art and that 's why they're so successful so hopefully Honda will offer 'bodykit deletion' as a no cost extra.
Highly unlikely smile

athol

325 posts

211 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Amazing.

There was a recent thread where many chastised the recently ended Subaru STI (hatch and saloon) for being ugly and now Honda come up with this. As an STI owner, I am insulted by how hideous that Civic is. I hope, for Honda's sake and for the sake of my eyesight that it's not production ready and that in fact, they will be reversing it back through Halfords to remove some of that gaudy bodykit and spoiler before launching it.

If that gets approved by Honda's board for production it will be up there with the idiot small Vauxhall Adam in marketing mistakes. And somebody is actually being paid to make these.

Amazing.

muffinmenace

1,033 posts

189 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Why isn't everyone complaining about the fact it's FWD?
Is anyone actually stupid enough to click on an article about a Civic Type-R and then complain about its drive train?

MustardCutter

238 posts

121 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Why isn't everyone complaining about the fact it's FWD?
Don't know if that's sarcasm or not but complaining about a hot hatch based on a car that is already FWD and the fact that most hot hatches are (and traditionally have been) FWD would be silly.

Riyazc

1,068 posts

243 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Thats horrific... who designed the bodywork.. Leepu???

As an ex ITR owner... please make that car again.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
number1nesta said:
One exhaust per cylinder, quite amazing. Seriously, exhausts on cars are just getting plain silly these days - about as silly as this car looks, really.
I see that posted a far bit on PH, but I don't think cylinder count has much to do with it. Too make a given amount of power, an engine has to pump in a certain amount of air; the combustion process means it has to expel a certain amount of exhaust gases. Increase the power, increase the exhaust gases. Certainly in the case of exhaust headers, there needs to be a suitable diameter (or cross-sectional area) to get rid the generated amount of gas.

Wouldn't turbo engines benefit from a greater volume of exhaust after the turbo, to increase pressure differentials before and after the turbine? Is there not an increase in response, boost, or a bit of both? Any techs or engineers able to confirm or deny?

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
MustardCutter said:
Johnnytheboy said:
Why isn't everyone complaining about the fact it's FWD?
Don't know if that's sarcasm or not but complaining about a hot hatch based on a car that is already FWD and the fact that most hot hatches are (and traditionally have been) FWD would be silly.
You obviously don't read many threads following announcements of performance cars on here.

If they are FWD they should be 4wd.

If they are 4wd it's the wrong sort of 4wd.

And in both cases they should be RWD.

Oh, and they weigh far too much.

I was wondering if this was some kind of manufacturing bias: if Honda do it, it's OK?

is1

188 posts

149 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
MustardCutter said:
Yep, they are running the estate version in BTCC: http://www.honda.co.uk/racing/btcc/
And hatch in WTCC: http://world.honda.com/WTCC/

They've been pretty damn good with touring cars the past few years, but without a road car to go with it until they finally get this new CTR released, lol.
So I see (having had a quick scoot around for info), I stand corrected.
It just seems they haven't shouted about it, as you suggest, probably because they haven't had a road car to go with it.
However, I still maintain, this is going to be a tough sell.

LuS1fer

41,137 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
I liked the EP3 and first FN2.
I've never been keen on this current model, to look at.

This makes it even worse so it would be a no from me.

MB 1

525 posts

186 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all


That's what it needs to look like. Love it.

Edited by MB 1 on Wednesday 14th May 14:01

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
I think it looks awesome, fk subtlety smile

Alfa159Ti

827 posts

158 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Ha - it's hideous.

It looks like a go-faster Prius. Except that, if it were a Prius underneath it would probably be a bit cooler.

'Subtle' was the key.

Just what I had in mind when I was looking at this newer monstrosity.

Whatever happened to the art of understated car design...

Gandahar

9,600 posts

129 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Well lets face it, all those subtle Civics of years gone by end up with a dustbin exhaust and suspension lowered by 40cm rather than mm.... so at least it will save them the trouble.

Honda will have to make a car that is totally stonking to drive to make it's britches match it's mouth though. Let's hope so.

Perhaps they just got carried away after modelling the Jazz for all those years.

Actually I'd like to see a 300bhp Jazz with lots of body kit. The Silver Racer crowd has never been properly catered for. smokin

Greg_D

6,542 posts

247 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
The rear wheels look neither large enough or have the correct offset to look good against those rear arches, they look a little apologetic, tbh. Especially with how overtly aggressive the rest of the car is.

The accountants have clearly got their miserly little talons into it and for the sake of about £50/car, completely disjointed the styling, well done lads!!!!!!!

LOW4LYFE

159 posts

122 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
It's hard to judge from a photo of a matte black car. The kit is clearly motorsport inspired, which I think is a good thing.

I do find it strange that here on PH, when a new Audi/VW/German car breaks cover, people accuse it of being "bland" or other such vague, non quantifiable styling judgments. Then Honda come along with this, and all of a sudden it's too "fussy" or "halfords".

scratchchin

Spyder3400

233 posts

164 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
It's drivetrain and engine will be the interesting bit with a bit of luck as per Hondas past, let's face it Honda aesthetics have never been all that. Did I read somewhere that it's being developed in Europe not Japan? Big mistake if so.

Dave Hedgehog

14,568 posts

205 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
Bring back Pininfarina.....



not if hes going to design extremely bland cars like that

Antj

1,049 posts

201 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
Bring back Pininfarina.....



that must have been when Stevie Pininfarina was chief designer, the lesser known blind member of the company.

Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
redcard

Automatic "0" for quad exhausts on a 4-pot.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

129 months

Wednesday 14th May 2014
quotequote all
Clivey said:
redcard

Automatic "0" for quad exhausts on a 4-pot.
Same for the new Golf R.

As someone mentioned two in the middle would be better. Saves weight as well I would have thought.