RE: Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake: Review

RE: Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake: Review

Author
Discussion

Court_S

13,005 posts

178 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
I like it...but I love fast estates.

I think the Jag is a handsome beast and I actually like the blue. If I had the cash, they'd be on my list of cars to look at.

jamieduff1981

8,027 posts

141 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Jedilai said:
jamieduff1981 said:
I disagree. Ok it's the saloon rather than the estate but I've bought one. With the big carbon fibre spoiler. In French Racing Blue.

I have never aspired to an Audi, and you'll see that I've got a history of Jaguars including a green one with cream interior and maple dashboard.

My wife loves our Jags but is still in her late 20s and I'm 33. We wanted something with the performance of our Cerbera and exciting to drive but refined, every-day useable for my wife who is an enthusiastic driver but a full-time mother so the car had to be capable of carrying our children about plus a big boot for going on trips. There was an XKR which was nice and an XKR-S which was more expensive. We started out looking to spend £23k on a BMW that day, then a £33k XKR, dismissed the £55k XKR-S when the kids clearly wouldn't fit in the XKR then resigned to needing an XF of some sort. XJs are ok but too big to park in the sorts of carparks we need to go to and I don't like the back end much. It's also a bit mature still which I personally wanted to get away from and an XJR is close to £100k which I felt would be too big a financial sacrifice to our lifestyle if I used the BMW money as deposit and got the rest on finance.

She test drove a V6 diesel XF and liked the similarity to our S-Type in terms of its chassis and controls feel and layout, but didn't like the engine. We thought about an XFR last year, thinking sensible colours etc but it's just not that special when you can now buy a 2.2 diesel aRSeport which looks the same, and whilst nice and engaging the S-Type chassis is beyond its best with 500bhp.

We saw the XFR-S, particularly in bright blue with a big spoiler as light hearted, clearly unusual (since you can't buy a 2.2d in French Racing Blue), very fast if you want yet perfectly useable and takes all our favourite things about the S-Type's dynamics and improves on it all.

Whether you think it looks gauche or not may or may not matter. I had been planning to buy a used BMW V10 M6 the day I left my deposit for the XFR-S because I've had 3 old-man Jags already and whilst nice, I wanted something more and a bit more fun. The XFR-S has meant Jaguar has had a sale out of me that they probably wouldn't have had otherwise because I didn't really find the XFR all that compelling as a package.
Came into this thread expecting you to whip up a storm! You know me as Craig S..., Jediali being my lurking identity. Your brief explanation puts a car like this into good perspective. This review brings a lot of good praise too so I guess it can only make you more excited about the new car arriving.
Hi Craig byebye

Need to give you my new address!

stuartrav

49 posts

213 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
There was an identical car (but with English plates) parked in Chelmsford B&Q over the Bank Holiday weekend, I guess it was a press vehicle???

oldtimer2

728 posts

134 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
J8 SVG said:
ETO doesn't exist any more, it's SVO (Special Vehicle Operations?) now, I believe
I stand corrected. I guess SVO will cover products that JLR think up, as well as those engineered to customer order.

craig_m67

949 posts

189 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Nobody tell Jaguar but....... It's been done already?
(Wonder how they compare.. of you go Monkey)


A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
It's not 4WD and for that price it darn well should be.

3795mpower

486 posts

131 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
So it was you guys we saw as we filled up at Dottinger Hohe on Monday morning,
Sounded good.......

jamieduff1981

8,027 posts

141 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
It's not 4WD and for that price it darn well should be.
It's an absolute joy to drive. The M5 and E63 AMG aren't AWD either and in my personal opinion the XFR-S is all the better for it. I doubt I'd have even considered one if it were AWD.

unpc

2,837 posts

214 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
It's not 4WD and for that price it darn well should be.
Odd statement. Given the choice I'd take RWD over 4WD even if they were the same price.

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
A Scotsman said:
It's not 4WD and for that price it darn well should be.
Agree with other peoples responses. Since when does 4wd vs Rwd dictate the premium market on cost? Somebody must tell Ferrari, Mac, Rolls Royce etc they are too expensive and should have 4wd.

I'm pretty sure Lambo charged more for their Balboni with just 2 wheels peddled over the 4wd?

Strange strange comment.

hondansx

4,570 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
So it's £8k more than an M5 (saloon). How would standard spec compare?

jamieduff1981

8,027 posts

141 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
You'd need to compare the specs of a standard M5 Touring against this and option one or the other up to a similar standard to compare them.

The XFR-S saloon lists at £79,995.

Anyone considering this as a posh and overpriced Subaru Legacy estate has missed the point a bit IMHO.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Pommygranite said:
£83,000 May 2014

£45,000 May 2015 with 20,000 miles.
Rubbing my hands in anticipation.

Leggy

1,019 posts

223 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Well done Jaguar for making this.
Great halo product and with mainly only German manufacturers with something similar it offers a genuine alternative.
Price sounds reasonable considering.

Wills2

22,894 posts

176 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
68k with the discount Broadspeed are offering, still I'd prefer the RS6 looks meatier with a far better interior.

Too much of the car looks stuck on rather than crafted to fit.

A Scotsman

1,000 posts

200 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
unpc said:
A Scotsman said:
It's not 4WD and for that price it darn well should be.
Odd statement. Given the choice I'd take RWD over 4WD even if they were the same price.
Not if you lived in Northern Scotland you wouldn't. It still snows here!

Phil Dicky

7,162 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Pommygranite said:
£83,000 May 2014

£45,000 May 2015 with 20,000 miles.
Indeed! Please go out an buy one immediately and let me know next year when i can get it from you! ;-)
Can we form a queue smile

rb5er

11,657 posts

173 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Awesome car, love it.

Art0ir

9,402 posts

171 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
How does this compare price wise with the German super estates?

Esseesse

8,969 posts

209 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
Its like a Marks and Sparks Monaro, a bit pricey and just a tad flawed and old fashioned, a curious device.
I agree, don't really like it. An Audi RS6 or M5 Touring would be my choice.