RE: Ford Focus RS Mk2: PH Buying Guide

RE: Ford Focus RS Mk2: PH Buying Guide

Author
Discussion

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
RS500 doesn't have 'matt black paint' - it's wrapped.

I believe they're painted Panther Black first - and you can, if you wish, unwrap em.

Usual rules apply as it's a wrap - no car washes, no jetwashes, clean-off birdst and treesap ASAP - pain in the arse, basically, loads of people will ignore that so you need to check the condition of the wrap (tho it's easily redone in full or part)


schaeffs

324 posts

143 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Gratuitous Pics!




anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Can't get over how they haven't really depreciated since new. A low miles one is pretty much worth what it cost brand new from the dealer.

I'd like one but couldn't bear spending 20k plus on a 5 year old Focus..

E92 M3s are the same price yet cost double new...

mikey P 500

1,240 posts

188 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Dont understand the high values. Who is buying up all the old performance fords pushing up prices.

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with the TT RS

dc2rr07 said:
agree with above, requires the Lux Pack 2 though to get the better seats.

Had a couple of test drives, then opted for a TT RS (stands back and waits for the usual Audi comments)

Dave211

1,670 posts

182 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Plato seems to think it was a good all round car for road. Reference to "council estate chariot" and "McDonald's car parks" a bit cheeky from Needell

http://youtu.be/QS8wT6nCOyo

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Takes one to know one eh. Chav like the tattoos you have. Chavs are also now buying CLS55 AMG's smile

stats007 said:
I didn't think Chavs had £40k to spend on a car whistle?

rtz62

3,371 posts

156 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
There's a big buyer of Focii RSs, easily found on FaceAche etc, that seem to hoover most up and keep the prices, in my opinion, artificially high.
For those of us who own, or have owned a Sierra RS500, there is only one car worthy of the RS500 moniker, and it surely isn't a focus (there, started that arguement!)
If ember turning up at a local RSOC meeting in mine just after the Focus Imposter 500 had been released.
As I drove in there was a crown round aforementioned Focus.
By the time I had pulled to a standstill, they had all migrated to my car.
Caught sight of the Focus owner muttering something that looked like 'banker' towards myself and my car, to which I replied only with a beatific smile....

Bennet

2,122 posts

132 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
I appreciate there's history behind the RS brand and the performance is there, but it looks like a halfords shop window job. I'd have driven it with pride a few years ago. Now it would be embarrassing.

mackay45

832 posts

172 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
mikey P 500 said:
Dont understand the high values. Who is buying up all the old performance fords pushing up prices.
These guys:

http://www.rs-direct.co.uk/sales.php

Not saying they are pushing prices up but a large amount of Mk2 sales must go through them.

E9X M3 are available for a similar price as pointed out, but in 3 years time which will be worth the most? Probably the Mk2 FRS. Plus the servicing/maintenance of the FRS should be cheaper so its probably still a more financially 'sensible' purchase at that price point I would have thought.

Also whilst the E9X M3 is probably the car I'd prefer to own, they are common as muck. I've got a Mk1 Focus RS and am debating an E92 M3 purchase in a couple of years (when they hit £15k?!) - I'd love to keep the Mk1 FRS too, and if I can that will be the one that stays in the garage - the M3 can live on the street.

All of that is my own opinion and probably all complete tripe so hopefully no-one takes it too seriously/personally.

MajorProblem

4,700 posts

165 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Bennet said:
I appreciate there's history behind the RS brand and the performance is there, but it looks like a halfords shop window job. I'd have driven it with pride a few years ago. Now it would be embarrassing.
Wot u sayin bout my mowta?


Neil_M

694 posts

185 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Sense of occasion. Thats what I will always think of when I see them.

Looks may not be to everyone's taste, but the noise (pops, bangs, warbles) certainly won me over. The part leather recaro's, locking me into place had me wanting to take it by the scruff of the neck and drive it down a back road...

Great cars IMO. Marmite cars possibly.

ezi

1,734 posts

187 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
What other normal cars can people think of which are are depreciation-proof as these? Wish I could afford the cost to buy one because I reckon you'd lose less on an RS than anything else over 2-3 years.

anything fast

983 posts

165 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
those who mock the 0-60 time really know little about cars in my view... The mid range and top end on this car is simply amazing for a FWD hatch. The way this car was designed was to make it very driveable for even a ham fisted driver. 1st off this car is no light weight stripped out special with plastic windows etc.. they are pretty loaded with kit and laden with lots of airbags etc to make it not only fast, but very safe to drive in any condition. Next something tech types should take note of, power delivery is restricted in the lower gears to make it again more useable and surely to ensure crap drivers are not screaming in to the nearest hedge in a cloud of under steer and tyre smoke.

I have driven a few of these and also owned a 300 HP focus ST which was on paper a good match, but in reality would have been destroyed by a FRS in all but a straight line. I recently went on a track day and alongside lambos, 911's and ferrari's the only 'normal' car there was a Blue bog standard FRS. The instructor told me it was faster on this twisty track than the 400 HP Ferrari 360 Modena I drove on the day. He them demonstrated this by taking me in a proper flying lap, where he tore past other instructors in a 911 and a V8 Vantage. He made the point clear that on the track you could use every last BHP in one of these! So unless you have driven one, I would restrict comments to factual stuff and comparing it with 15 years old cars is just silly. If you want to go fast for peanuts buy an 20 years old imported skyline GTS for £4000 and watch it blow up after a week and hold its value like a dose of the clap.

For those who thinking of buying one.. go for it, a rock solid investment, very reliable (unlike fords of old) and a damn fine car... just avoid the green!!

also quick anorak note, the RS500's were not painted matt black, they started as gloss black and were shipped to 3M in germany and wrapped in Vinyl. read

jesigo

53 posts

213 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
dc2rr07 said:
agree with above, requires the Lux Pack 2 though to get the better seats.

Had a couple of test drives, then opted for a TT RS (stands back and waits for the usual Audi comments)
Leather seats were not part of Lux Pack 2, seperate option.

Uncle John

4,300 posts

192 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Another gratuitous pic:



Lux 2 with leather, BT and USB.

Sold it standard with 17 k on the clock and only lost 1k, I'd have it back in a heartbeat.



Edited by Uncle John on Friday 30th May 20:52

Dave211

1,670 posts

182 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all

Some vid of the RS from one of Clarkson DVD's at 65 mins in :- http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTM3MzQzMzI0.html


anything fast said:
So unless you have driven one, I would restrict comments to factual stuff
Quite correct. The car needs to be driven on same track by same driver for fair comparisons

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/top_gear_track.html

To be fair there isnt another hot hatch above it.

anything fast said:
t

also quick anorak note, the RS500's were not painted matt black, they started as gloss black and were shipped to 3M in germany and wrapped in Vinyl. read
Didn't know that. Bet gloss black would look quite mean !


Edited by Dave211 on Friday 30th May 18:44

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Joeguard1990 said:
Junior supercar is the wrong term to use when talking about a FWD car in my opinion...
You probably haven't had enough exposure to this place to understand the context of the "junior supercar" quip.


BeefMaster9000

82 posts

225 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
Dave211 said:
Quite correct. The car needs to be driven on same track by same driver for fair comparisons

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/top_gear_track.html

To be fair there isnt another hot hatch above it.
Except the megane 265, which is apparently 2 seconds a lap quicker. With 85 hp less..

Pretty impressive if true.

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

174 months

Friday 30th May 2014
quotequote all
356Speedster said:
To dismiss the car because of 0-60 is short sighted. Of course if you're into drag-racing look elsewhere, but when you instead concentrate on the in-gear acceleration, you see the car's potency. A couple of yrs ago evo mag figured an MP350 against a 911 C4S Powerkit and the RS was faster in most of the speed / gear tests. This is where the RS scores and surprises.... oh that and the fact that it can use it's power thru' the front wheels as well, of course ;-)
Why would the Porsche driver not change down a gear?