Badly modified cars thread Mk2

Badly modified cars thread Mk2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Roman Moroni

989 posts

124 months

Jazoli

9,104 posts

251 months

Sunday 15th June 2014
quotequote all




Spotted today, it has a cummins 6 cylinder diesel engine in it.



irocfan

40,545 posts

191 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Jazoli said:




Spotted today, it has a cummins 6 cylinder diesel engine in it.
now I like that!!!

Pixelpeep

8,600 posts

143 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Roman Moroni said:
That made me cry a little frown

RSteve

174 posts

151 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all

jmflare

413 posts

142 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Exactly what it says, really.

Amateurs. As in "persons not qualified as engineers, and not employed in the design and development of motor cars" who decide that, despite the extensive testing, the wind tunnel development time, computer modelling, simulator rigs, etc, that all costs millions of pounds/dollars/euros and thousands upon thousands of man-hours, that they, a mobile phone salesman/double glazing installer/call centre operator from Bradford/Cardiff/Southend, actually knew the answer to building the perfect Skyline/Passat/CLK/Astra all along. Amateurs.
That argument is retarded and you know it.

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Hmmmmm confused

Care to explain your reasoning on that one. I see plenty of evidence in this thread which backs my assertion, and none whatsoever which is likely to prove yours.

I'd like to enter into evidence exhibit 1 for the defence...



...moronic AMATEUR(s) ruin several fine Porsche motor cars to create an abortion, then kids himself that it'll fetch £45,000. See? Now let's see your evidence to the contrary.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
I see plenty of evidence in this thread which backs my assertion, and none whatsoever which is likely to prove yours.
There's a rather obvious reason for that; you might want to reread the thread title.

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
yellowjack said:
I see plenty of evidence in this thread which backs my assertion, and none whatsoever which is likely to prove yours.
There's a rather obvious reason for that; you might want to reread the thread title.


yellowjack also said:
Now let's see your evidence to the contrary.
wink

Otter Smacker

6,524 posts

195 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all

gfunk

279 posts

213 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Otter Smacker said:
How does that even move?

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
gfunk said:
Otter Smacker said:
How does that even move?
What? That's proper classy modifying, that. Can't you see the research, the development time, the extensive safety testing, and the engineering expertise that's been expended improving what the lazy idle bastids at GM Europe couldn't be bothered to get right in the first place...

jmflare said:
That argument is retarded and you know it.
wink

irocfan said:
because of course the pros always get it right wink

winkwink


Am I getting the hang of this now, boys? confused

jmflare

413 posts

142 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Hmmmmm confused

Care to explain your reasoning on that one. I see plenty of evidence in this thread which backs my assertion, and none whatsoever which is likely to prove yours.

I'd like to enter into evidence exhibit 1 for the defence...



...moronic AMATEUR(s) ruin several fine Porsche motor cars to create an abortion, then kids himself that it'll fetch £45,000. See? Now let's see your evidence to the contrary.
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

SMcP114

2,916 posts

193 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
The whole stupid amateur modifying 'scene' summed up in one short video clip.
Have you ever owned anything worth modifying?

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
jmflare said:
I got as far as two pages into that. Then I managed to stop laughing, picked myself up off the floor, and quickly came back to the relative safety of this thread, where we post what looks like pictures of exactly the same cars as the ones in your link, but instead of fawning over them, we (correctly) pour scorn on them.

I fear you really are serious about introducing the contents of that thread as evidence for the prosecution, when I am confident that it will simply assist me in my defence wink

I'll admit that one or two of those cars look really nice. But they tend to be the ones that are externally identical or at least similar to the original unmodified cars. And the one's that have been mechanically altered? The few I looked more deeply at simply swapped one manufactured drive train for one from another vehicle. The others seem to have been done by professionals. So my disdainful comment about amateurs fking up previously decent motors stands tongue out

ETA: I particularly liked this comment...

VR6 Turbo said:
boyoM3 said:
Do people pay these guys to fk up beyond all recognition, their cars for them? I've got half a mind to call Trading Standards!
EFA

VR
...in regard to the "Dream Developments" abortions cars.

It seems that these 'modifiers' have been staying up far too late smoking 'special' cigarettes and watching too much "Pimp My Ride".


Edited by yellowjack on Monday 16th June 22:52

yellowjack

17,080 posts

167 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
SMcP114 said:
Have you ever owned anything worth modifying?
Define "worth modifying".

And have this back at you...

Scantily said:
Agent Orange said:
Lovely and Ghias are still very cheap when you consider the rise in value of some air cooled VW's. Way prefer the coupes to the convertible Ghia's.

Nice Outlaw 356

http://www.stanceworks.com/2011/12/outlaw/


That's disgusting.
...from that 'decently modified' thread (I kid you not!!!)

PomBstard

6,790 posts

243 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Not sure if we've had this one yet - 959 replica based on a 911 - yours for AU$47500, call it GBP25k...

http://carsales.mobi/cars/details/1984-porsche-911...

Flibble

6,476 posts

182 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
...from that 'decently modified' thread (I kid you not!!!)
That should be in here surely?

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Pixelpeep said:
That made me cry a little frown
It wasn't a GTE, just an SXi

Negative Creep

24,991 posts

228 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
irocfan said:
Jazoli said:




Spotted today, it has a cummins 6 cylinder diesel engine in it.
now I like that!!!
Now that is awesome. I would love to rock up to an Owner's Club meeting in that and see the reaction
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED