RE: £10K motorway speeding fines

RE: £10K motorway speeding fines

Author
Discussion

chrispphunt

13 posts

125 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Just another way to get more money in general by the looks of it- we as motorists are easy to impose charges on...

dingocooke said:
Not unless they have changed very recently; I got a fixed penalty SP30 in December with £60 fine and 3 points, or the option of no points and £90 speed awareness four hour course.
Looks like poor research/standard journalism?
They have changed very recently, my friend just got cuaght doing 47 in a 40 zone.
Very unlucky but a £100 fine and 3 points- or the option to not have points and take an awerness course at a further cost of £100....

JackReacher

2,130 posts

216 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz said:
You would need to be earning £700 to £1000 net per week and have committed the most serious speeding offence to get near that now.
Is it really that low? £700 net a week doesn't make you a high earner, and will hurt if you have dependents.

MrTickle

1,825 posts

240 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
dingocooke said:
Frimley111R said:
Speeding fines aren't £100 are they?
Not unless they have changed very recently; I got a fixed penalty SP30 in December with £60 fine and 3 points, or the option of no points and £90 speed awareness four hour course.
Looks like poor research/standard journalism?
£100 now, they have all been increased.

David87

6,665 posts

213 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Oh well, I best go out late tonight a do a top speed run whilst it's still relatively cheap, then. hehe

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

32,880 posts

218 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
JackReacher said:
£700 net a week doesn't make you a high earner, and will hurt if you have dependents.
It's about £40,000 a year gross.

Depending on the seriousness, you are fined 50%, 100% or 150% of your relevant weekly income. For speeding that's up to a maximum of £1000 and on the motorway £2500. You are not going to get near the current maximum of £1000 unless you are a high earner, have pleaded not guilty and gone though trial and lost and have offended at the most serious end of the scale.

Very, very few motorists will be affected by the change in ay way.

Debaser

6,005 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Speed Matters.

mike-r

1,539 posts

192 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Maybe if people learnt how to drive in the first place less accidents would occur. Don't recall being on any motorway in my driving lessons as a youf, or driving at night. Sure people generally can drive, but they aren't taught from the beginning about how to anticipate other motorists on faster roads like motorways, nor are they taught not to stop an empty bloody roundabouts.

All new drivers are st, the end.

Edition87

582 posts

140 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
shalmaneser said:
sunnydude959 said:
You know what. I give up.

This is absolutely fking ridiculous. £10k fine?!
What is ridiculous about that?

It's a lot of money but if you're stupid enough to be spanking your Porsche turbo S at 190mph you've probably got it coming.
This.

ukaskew

10,642 posts

222 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
This won't be popular but I don't see the point in the cap, if it's for serious offences and linked to earnings anyway, the £10k limit seems a little arbitrary. Presumably the fine is a deterrent as well as a (very minor) earner for the govt, so £10k for a Prem footballer doing 190mph for example, is nothing.

Pistachio

1,116 posts

191 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Interestingly fines are better than time inside as one person in jail costs the government/Us 2010/2011 figures from a FOI doc

michaelcolby83

40 posts

121 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
shalmaneser said:
sunnydude959 said:
You know what. I give up.

This is absolutely fking ridiculous. £10k fine?!
What is ridiculous about that?

It's a lot of money but if you're stupid enough to be spanking your Porsche turbo S at 190mph you've probably got it coming.
They should build a race track somewhere in Britain designed purely for high speed driving, a big 5 mile oval or something, and charge people to use it. At the moment, people who want to drive flat out have no other choice but to use the motorways. There are dozens of tracks in Britain, does every single last one need to be tight and twisty?

michaelcolby83

40 posts

121 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
PAULJ5555 said:
sunnydude959 said:
You know what. I give up.

This is absolutely ******* ridiculous. £10k fine?!
Why - Don't speed = no fine.
That would be fine if motorway limits weren't too low.

sanctum

191 posts

176 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Proportional fines please.

And video evidence should be a mandatory court submission to support anything over a standard speeding fine.

Pistachio

1,116 posts

191 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
I think the author is right
Anybody actually read the article properly rather than doing a Daily Mail Headline only judgement?

boyse7en

6,740 posts

166 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
michaelcolby83 said:
They should build a race track somewhere in Britain designed purely for high speed driving, a big 5 mile oval or something, and charge people to use it. At the moment, people who want to drive flat out have no other choice but to use the motorways. There are dozens of tracks in Britain, does every single last one need to be tight and twisty?

What, like Rockingham?


michaelcolby83

40 posts

121 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
michaelcolby83 said:
They should build a race track somewhere in Britain designed purely for high speed driving, a big 5 mile oval or something, and charge people to use it. At the moment, people who want to drive flat out have no other choice but to use the motorways. There are dozens of tracks in Britain, does every single last one need to be tight and twisty?

What, like Rockingham?
No, a 5 mile oval which can be driven flat out all the way around. Rockingham on track days is not such a track, there are multiple slow corners and the straights are not that long (like on 1001 other tracks).

callmedave

2,686 posts

146 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
To average you and me, Whatever we would have been fined last month, we will still be fined next month.

(i was not fined last month, its just hypothetical)

The way the papers are wording this should persuade the average non-pistonheader to pay a little more attention while driving, so i see it as a good move.

y2blade

56,132 posts

216 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz said:
ManFromDelmonte said:
Oh Christ. Did anyone bother reading the article or did everyone stop at the headline before posting?
I think most have read the headline, put plugs in ears and got straight onto sharpening the pitchforks.
Because PHers.

bozzy101

506 posts

140 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
michaelcolby83 said:
No, a 5 mile oval which can be driven flat out all the way around. Rockingham on track days is not such a track, there are multiple slow corners and the straights are not that long (like on 1001 other tracks).
Milbrook has a fairly decent High speed ring. I managed 110mph on that :-)

joema

2,649 posts

180 months

Tuesday 10th June 2014
quotequote all
Seems reasonable. Especially fining drink drivers a lot more