RE: C63 Black Series vs GT-R NISMO

RE: C63 Black Series vs GT-R NISMO

Author
Discussion

Tuvra

7,921 posts

226 months

Wednesday 20th August 2014
quotequote all
Escort3500 said:
And make it incredibly chavvy in the process smile
Just like the Nismo then? smile

Don't get me wrong, I like both. I'd have the C63BS over the Nismo, but the standard GTR over the C63 wobble

f1ten

2,161 posts

154 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
incredible from the back the c63 black really does look like the clk63 black.

nickfrog

21,201 posts

218 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
I love these nimble little darty cars, such fun.
That made me laugh. The fact that I seem to be the only one to notice it says a lot I think.
The other funny thing is when people say x car will run rings around y car. Actually it won't. The driver will. And at that level of performance, your average road driver usually scares themselves at 6/10ths anyway. The weakest link will be the driver not the car, even the GTR. Your average enthusiast driver will favour a Caterham on track, however "slow" that makes him.

MagicMike

234 posts

121 months

Friday 22nd August 2014
quotequote all
GTR is an amazing car, I've been fortunate enough to go on a track day, and this was one of the cars on offer. The power just keeps coming, no effort required to drive, and if it wasn't for the speedo, you'd swear you were doing much lower speeds.

Own a C63, and continuosly looking for reasons to take it for a drive. Obviously the power and noise are out of this world, but when other road users do a double take at the lights when they catch the 6.3 badges on the wings, or when gunning through a tunnel and the snap crackle and pop from the exhausts resonate off the walls, you don't regret the requent trips to the fuel station . Best is looking in your rear view mirror as pedestrians turn round thinking "WTF was that" as you floor it.

Both cars appeal to different markets, the GTR has a massive following in the aftermarket tuning sector, with people like Litchfield constantly changing the landscape. C63 drivers upgrading is a little less common in comparison.

That said they are both great cars

Edited by MagicMike on Friday 22 August 13:20

Rudeboy350Z

122 posts

196 months

Sunday 24th August 2014
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
That made me laugh. The fact that I seem to be the only one to notice it says a lot I think.
The other funny thing is when people say x car will run rings around y car. Actually it won't. The driver will. And at that level of performance, your average road driver usually scares themselves at 6/10ths anyway. The weakest link will be the driver not the car, even the GTR. Your average enthusiast driver will favour a Caterham on track, however "slow" that makes him.
....these cars are all about big power - big lumps in the front - if you want a nimble little darty car then look elsewhere my friend and stop comparing apples with pears......

P4ROT

1,219 posts

194 months

Sunday 24th August 2014
quotequote all
Why anyone would pay for the stupid spoiler and air flicks on the 63 is beyond me- that looks so much better without!

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Sunday 24th August 2014
quotequote all
k-ink said:
The GTR looks awesome. I do love an AMG but come on, they won't touch a GTR.

I remember a wonderful quote on here from years ago. Anyone else recall it? Something like... (Re: scary fast circuit laps) - "I saw Jesus so many times I started using him as a braking marker".

biggrin
That would be funny and clever, if it wasn't a butchered version of a quote from Kevin Schwantz talking about his Suzuki RGV500.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Only just seen this thread, following the C63 Black article this week.

Both very good cars. I prefer the Black over the white, both are significantly better than their base models.