RE: Lotus boss Jean-Marc Gales: PH Meets (again)

RE: Lotus boss Jean-Marc Gales: PH Meets (again)

Author
Discussion

blueg33

36,016 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Toaster said:
tram50 said:
forester2945 said:
mrdemon said:
Evora needs a new engine to sell world wide it's a old nasty thing and def not the right engine for the exige either.
Not the right engine for the Exige? have you driven/seen one?
I suspect the Porsche owners would prefer a flat 6 that sounds like a hair dryer instead smile
Well mrdemon (AKA Bat Man) has quite a fantasy garage of previous cars ( reckon I will get flamed for that) and his personal web site is......have a double guess....Porsche so that makes mrdemons comments nul and void smile (standby for a second flaming)
I believe (from a Mod) that he has been banned from some Lotus Forums for trolling smile

Appraently though, he has owned a Lotus before but when he had an Audi TT that was the best car on the planet wink

RTH

1,057 posts

213 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
tram50 said:
smilo996 said:
...Presumably is does not help that Lorus F1 has also be sold off...
I never knew Group Lotus ever owned the current Lotus F1 Team smile
They don't

jamieduff1981

8,028 posts

141 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Lotus is a brand I really want to love but so far there's little chemistry there.

I think they'd do well to seek styling help from some world class designers. Their products functionally do well, and whilst not hideous things to look at as per the David Bangle BMW 6 series which really is a car that would look better after a crash, the current Lotus designs are a bit unresolved. I think some Ginettas look better. They've got slightly kitcarish looks.

tram50

82 posts

141 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
RTH said:
tram50 said:
smilo996 said:
...Presumably is does not help that Lorus F1 has also be sold off...
I never knew Group Lotus ever owned the current Lotus F1 Team smile
They don't
And never have smile

mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
forester2945 said:
Not the right engine for the Exige? have you driven/seen one?
driven it 4 times never been that impressed with it, seems a bit slow in the real world vs what other cars are lapping the ring in these days.
and it understeers quite bad. but a geo can sort that,

Just think it's too heavy and the BHP quoted is nowhere near what it has imo. prefer what I have already got, but a nice toy when they reach 35k.

Thought about a CUP car but £67k for a toy is out the question.

mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
I believe (from a Mod) that he has been banned from some Lotus Forums for trolling smile

Appraently though, he has owned a Lotus before but when he had an Audi TT that was the best car on the planet wink
I am not banned at all. I left because the forum was getting a joke.
I spent 5 years in LOtus cars and had a 008 Motorsport Elise S2 and spent 8k on my Exige to track spec.

As for the TTRS a remapped one is one of todays fastest A to B cars on the planet,

Toaster

2,939 posts

194 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
forester2945 said:
Not the right engine for the Exige? have you driven/seen one?
driven it 4 times never been that impressed with it, seems a bit slow in the real world vs what other cars are lapping the ring in these days.
and it understeers quite bad. but a geo can sort that,

Just think it's too heavy and the BHP quoted is nowhere near what it has imo. prefer what I have already got, but a nice toy when they reach 35k.

Thought about a CUP car but £67k for a toy is out the question.
Interesting as your comments seem to be opposite of most reviews, and could you build one for £35K....I doubt it

Here is a short version of the fifth Gear review.........quote....... "its small its Light" Hmmmm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi3rHles2fM maybe your right or maybe you are wrong

Edited to add the longer version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFJIgHbGCQg

Edited by Toaster on Wednesday 8th October 17:25

forester2945

32 posts

158 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
forester2945 said:
Not the right engine for the Exige? have you driven/seen one?
driven it 4 times never been that impressed with it, seems a bit slow in the real world vs what other cars are lapping the ring in these days.
Troll, idiot or moron your choice? It is many things slow in the real world is not one of them

HorneyMX5

5,309 posts

151 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
This new guy at Lotus seems to be saying all the right things for short term improvement with an eye on long term development.

I will own a Lotus one day, for now an MX5 is as close as I can get.

Imafreeman

117 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
The Elan concept was two seat wasn't it? I rather suspect it wouldn't be possible anyway because the Elan was longitudinal engined - the Evora engine is probably too high up and too far back.
No it was a 2+2

zebedee

4,589 posts

279 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
ok the new Boxster S has the same 340 BHP as the evora and has a co2 of 190 for only £47k

move along !!!

The Evora is a great car, it just needs a great Engine and a lower price tag.

no one wants hi co2 cars which do 20mpg £1k new car tax, with performance that poor.

Evora UK sales are next to zero for 2014, the numbers are madfe to look nice but UK sales are very very low for the EVora.

Edited by mrdemon on Wednesday 8th October 13:12
Co2 and mpg would be offset fairly quickly I would have thought bearing in mind the reliability and maintenance costs of a Toyota lump compared with a Porsche unit

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
Imafreeman said:
kambites said:
The Elan concept was two seat wasn't it? I rather suspect it wouldn't be possible anyway because the Elan was longitudinal engined - the Evora engine is probably too high up and too far back.
No it was a 2+2
I didn't realise that. It certainly can't have had much rear headroom, looking at the profile. hehe

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
zebedee said:
Co2 and mpg would be offset fairly quickly I would have thought bearing in mind the reliability and maintenance costs of a Toyota lump compared with a Porsche unit
Not to mention the difference in residuals. Unfortunately for Lotus, buyers don't look at costs rationally.

Frimley111R

15,685 posts

235 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
I am not banned at all. I left because the forum was getting a joke.

As for the TTRS a remapped one is one of todays fastest A to B cars on the planet,
You left after getting a ton of stick on there. Now you just do the same here. SELOC was/is fine and better without your 'VW Coupe' (see irrelevant comment above) and 'Beetle' crap. The stick you got was entirely due to your own postings.

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

152 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
driven it 4 times never been that impressed with it, seems a bit slow in the real world vs what other cars are lapping the ring in these days.
Not sure if I understand that. Do you want to tell us that the ring isn't your benchmark of choice, or that you find the Exige's laptimes to slow?

RemarkLima

2,379 posts

213 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
He sounds like it's a realistic plan... And if I needed a shopping trolley, then why not a Lotus one! Nothing else has driven like my old S1 Exige, ah fond memories...

Or a 2+2 lotus would do me, a modern elan +2 :-)

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

152 months

Wednesday 8th October 2014
quotequote all
HorneyMX5 said:
This new guy at Lotus seems to be saying all the right things for short term improvement with an eye on long term development.
Yep, agree. Proof will be in the cars obviously, but he sounds pretty level headed and passionate about the make at the same time. Very good combination for where they are at the moment.

Next coming up a Mk2 Evora? Hope they address a few issues that prevent them from selling a lot more in the states. Ease of entry (sills) one thing, another the somewhat rustic current AT. If they could source a good DKG, preferably one that is faster on paper than the MT...

Esseesse

8,969 posts

209 months

Thursday 9th October 2014
quotequote all
articulatedj said:
I have said it before, but if they simply rebody the Evora to look like the Bahar-era 2+2 Elan concept, they will double their sales. It seems so damned obvious. Just pony up the cash and do it.

People will quit worrying about a few horsepower or wide sills if it looked like this: http://www.hdcarwallpapers.com/lotus_elan_concept_...
I totally agree and have always thought this.

The idea of an Evora is great, but I probably wouldn't be bothered with its current looks. Infact if it looks like the concept people will accept wide sills in an endearing quirk kind of way. Alfa GTV was based on a FWD Tipo floor pan, but you still wanted one (and I want another one).

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
driven it 4 times never been that impressed with it, seems a bit slow in the real world vs what other cars are lapping the ring in these days.
and it understeers quite bad. but a geo can sort that,

Just think it's too heavy and the BHP quoted is nowhere near what it has imo. prefer what I have already got, but a nice toy when they reach 35k.

Thought about a CUP car but £67k for a toy is out the question.
I have driven a few Boxsters and Caymen but never been that impressed with them.

Just think they are seriously lacking in steering feel/precision and agility and they look a very dull. Will no doubt be expensive to maintain as well.

A bit of shed motoring though when they depreciate to the £4k level which they certainly will do.

Saying that, they are a bit common so would probably go with an MX5 instead which is probably more fun/interesting anyway.

Anyone spending north of £65k on a new non GT Porsche needs their head examined IMO. Forget the Lotus engine (at least it is reliable and does the job), Porsche steering is absolutely terrible.

mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 9th October 2014
quotequote all
zebedee said:
Co2 and mpg would be offset fairly quickly I would have thought bearing in mind the reliability and maintenance costs of a Toyota lump compared with a Porsche unit
had my car 2.5 years and 1 service with no faults, Porsche do 20k service intervals it's very cheap to run.

the EVora has to be serviced double that and I bet costs more to do so.