RE: BMW 1 Series facelift details

RE: BMW 1 Series facelift details

Author
Discussion

mikebrownhill

122 posts

199 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all

new666uk said:
Still not sure why the 1er comes in for so much aggro over it's looks. It's not as elegant as an old 7er or 3er (say e38 or e36 vintages) but it's a hatch so will always suffer stunted looks as the lines can't flow along a longer body.

There are some truly hideous motors out there -

Skoda Roomster
Mini Roadster (hardtop)
Toyota Yaris Verso

Each has serious problems with poorly flowing lines that make them look like 2 cars assembled like a Frankenstein's monster.

I've had e36, e46 coupes and now an M135. Given a preference, I'd do for a coupe again rather than the hatch as the lines suit a longer form but I'd hardly see it as having been hit by the ugly stick.

I guess we just need a lightening rod to project onto and this time round the 1er is it.
I agree, its a bit like trying to decide which of the ugly sisters is the worst, even with this facelift - there aren't any (5 door) hatchbacks out there that look like Cinderella to me, so you have to dig a bit deeper - I was after utility plus a bit of fun at a reasonable price and the M135i was my choice last year with, seriously, no regrets so far.

My son took it on a BMW track day recently and it was the only one there, a BMW guy in an M3 was released behind him and it took him six laps to reel him in - they have put some serious thought into the M135i; it's no M car but it's close - put a proper diff on it (the inside rear does light up on power exits) and some harder pads (easily done at the track) and you have the makings of a good day out and can still pick up some IKEA flat packs and a set of step ladders on the way home.

So back to the analogy; not the best (or worst) looking sister out there, but good in bed and will cook your dinner willingly, a good pedigree when you are seen out together, and importantly, won't break the bank. Just need to get a Cinderella for the weekend...

MondeoMan1981

2,357 posts

184 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
I miss my 1er. Most complete car I'd owned. £8k, sub 8s to 60, rwd, 130mph+, good handling, plenty space, practical and you could get up to 60mpg out of it.

va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Front definitely looks better but rear not so. Shame as the pre-facelift had grown on me over time! I'll definitely be taking a look at the 125d when it's out anyway

EDIT: Actually the 120d would do the job too, didn't realise it was quicker than the Golf GTD yikes

Edited by va1o on Saturday 17th January 14:04

Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
B10 said:
The dashboard still looks a messy dogs dinner.
Agreed. I get sea-sick just looking at it.
Most cars are being "designed" in this way nowadays, sadly. - If I wanted an E8x 1-Series or E9x 3-Series, I'd look for one without I-Drive but it seems that in the future, we won't have a choice but to have a messy dash full of tat. I much prefer the older E39/46 and Audi B6/7 generation and at least you can change the headunits because they're separate from the other systems (HVAC etc.).

TonyRPH

12,977 posts

169 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
As for being one of the best selling cars... Well it's a cheap way into a BMW badge, so it's always going to be popular.

A former colleague had an early 1 series, and I was amazed at how small and cramped the interior is.

That big 1/4 window in the back door doesn't help with the shape of the 'C' pillar either. IMHO it makes the back end look awkward.


fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Clivey said:
we won't have a choice but to have a messy dash full of tat.
Ooh, I don't know. I still think the XF dash looks good after almost 8 years....


Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
Ooh, I don't know. I still think the XF dash looks good after almost 8 years....

That is one of the exceptions, along with the Discovery & Range Rover (though the ICE is already dating badly)...but I did say "in the future". wink

Riskins

243 posts

126 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Can only echo what others have said but from the pictures the front has been improved and the rear looks dubious.

That said a 125d is a serious contender as the replacement company car, 220bhp and rwd can't be ignored vs sensible BIK figures.

Bodo

12,375 posts

267 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Petrolheads judging cars by looks, image and brand.

When looking at the 1 series, I see a hatchback that is rear wheel drive as standard and available with a straight six engine, symmetric induction system and probably the most efficient engine in its power band (please post if you know of a more efficient engine).

The one series always was a high-tech ugly house in a nice Victorian neighbourhood.

Sadly, this facelift will be the last of its kind; with the next generation being FWD as standard, and unlikely to get RWD hatches from BMW any more. From then on, petrolheads don't have anything else to distinguish the 1er from its competition other than looks, image and brand, and possibly technology in details.

Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Bodo said:
Petrolheads judging cars by looks, image and brand.

When looking at the 1 series, I see a hatchback that is rear wheel drive as standard and available with a straight six engine, symmetric induction system and probably the most efficient engine in its power band (please post if you know of a more efficient engine).

The one series always was a high-tech ugly house in a nice Victorian neighbourhood.

Sadly, this facelift will be the last of its kind; with the next generation being FWD as standard, and unlikely to get RWD hatches from BMW any more. From then on, petrolheads don't have anything else to distinguish the 1er from its competition other than looks, image and brand, and possibly technology in details.
yes

Once the 1-Series goes FWD and a 6-pot is no longer available, it'll be indistinguishable from every other Hyundai / Golf / washing machine on the road. The tacky dash won't matter.

torres del paine

1,588 posts

222 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
Like a turd does you mean?
You really are a broken record fatty, you pop up on every BMW thread and repeat the same tired remarks.

Gompo

4,415 posts

259 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Bodo said:
Petrolheads judging cars by looks, image and brand.

When looking at the 1 series, I see a hatchback that is rear wheel drive as standard and available with a straight six engine, symmetric induction system and probably the most efficient engine in its power band (please post if you know of a more efficient engine).

The one series always was a high-tech ugly house in a nice Victorian neighbourhood.

Sadly, this facelift will be the last of its kind; with the next generation being FWD as standard, and unlikely to get RWD hatches from BMW any more. From then on, petrolheads don't have anything else to distinguish the 1er from its competition other than looks, image and brand, and possibly technology in details.
I think that's a big part in why the looks are so derided. It's a RWD hatch, fairly unique and should appeal to 'car' types, however to many it doesn't have the looks to match. I'm sure people wouldn't be so outspoken about the visuals were it a Toyota Corolla; they just wouldn't care. But it's a BMW, who've generally made smart looking; nice driving cars.

Bodo

12,375 posts

267 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Gompo said:
I think that's a big part in why the looks are so derided. It's a RWD hatch, fairly unique and should appeal to 'car' types, however to many it doesn't have the looks to match. I'm sure people wouldn't be so outspoken about the visuals were it a Toyota Corolla; they just wouldn't care. But it's a BMW, who've generally made smart looking; nice driving cars.
I'm not sure what is more frightening:
20% of 1er drivers choosing a not exactly pretty car, or
80% of 1er drivers believing the car is OK without even knowing about its technological driving pleasure advantage
BMW benefits from confused 1-series owners

I had one, it was great to drive, fast and cheap, but it looked like a pregnant cat. I would buy an RWD one again, if I had to do higher mileages. BMW strives to increase EBIT per vehicle, and RWD is expensive. Now, if only 20% of all 1er drivers appreciate the RWD, they might as well ditch the RWD in the next generation while increasing EBIT at a possible lower turnover.

From 2019, I will probably take a look at Twingos, hoping for 180PS and a less restrictive traction control.


nickfrog

21,193 posts

218 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Bodo said:
Petrolheads judging cars by looks, image and brand.
Yes, I find it bizarre too. Almost as bizarre as not understanding that looks are subjective and that some don't care what OTHER people think of their choice/preference.

But anyway, we all know the real reason why people always find a good reason to hate on PH...



aeropilot

34,670 posts

228 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
as7920 said:
EricE said:
aeropilot said:
Given the remaining timescales, etc., you'd be seeing test mule 5dr versions in camo being photgraphed on test by now, so I'd say it's 99.5% certain there will be no true M version of the hatch coming out.
I believe BMW wants to position the 1 series as FWD shopping trolleys and the 2 series as RWD driver's cars in the future so hatchback version of the M2 seems very unlikely. Even the new M135i looks less aggressive than the already relatively tame old one which is not a bad thing but likely done to better position the M2 as the true compact sportscar.
However, with Mercedes A45AMG getting a boost in power, new RS3 > 360bhp and Golf R 400+ the M135i will be behind and it could prove enough for BMW to consider the option.

Much of the R&D would already have been completed too with the M235i, M2 and M135i. Using same engine there isn't too much left too test no?
But the components need to be fitted and tested in the relevant bodyshell, especially given the significant rear end mods needed to accomodate the ///M rear axle arrangement. With the 5-door body, the rear arch flares will be very different around the rear doors etc., so there would have to be a hatch mule on test now for it to make production.
It's not going to happen - simple as that.
The hatch isn't on sale in the USA as well, so not much chance of a restricted market M-car.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
torres del paine said:
fatboy b said:
Like a turd does you mean?
You really are a broken record fatty, you pop up on every BMW thread and repeat the same tired remarks.
Well when BMW stop producing the same looking tired cars, then maybe I'll change my tune biggrin

hufggfg

654 posts

194 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
Well when BMW stop producing the same looking tired cars, then maybe I'll change my tune biggrin
I'm sad to say I entirely agree with you on this. In everything other than a "looks" sense I very much like what BMW do, but I honestly can't think of any current BMW that I really find desirable from a visual aspect alone. The M4 is nice, but it's still pretty fussy. Nowadays most manufacturers have actually really upped the game in a design sense, I mean, even all the bland hatches out there nowadays are mostly quite attractive, so it's quite an impressive feat that BMW just don't seem to be able to design cohesively at all at the moment.

It's a real shame, because they have some absolutely stunning cars in their back catalogue, the E46 M3 for example I think is great, it may not be "beautiful" but it's certainly aggressive, well resolved and cohesive.

fatboy b

9,500 posts

217 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
hufggfg said:
I'm sad to say I entirely agree with you on this. In everything other than a "looks" sense I very much like what BMW do, but I honestly can't think of any current BMW that I really find desirable from a visual aspect alone. The M4 is nice, but it's still pretty fussy. Nowadays most manufacturers have actually really upped the game in a design sense, I mean, even all the bland hatches out there nowadays are mostly quite attractive, so it's quite an impressive feat that BMW just don't seem to be able to design cohesively at all at the moment.

It's a real shame, because they have some absolutely stunning cars in their back catalogue, the E46 M3 for example I think is great, it may not be "beautiful" but it's certainly aggressive, well resolved and cohesive.
Nicely put.

I think Bangle lead them down a styling cul-de-sac that they're now strugling to get out of.


Edited by fatboy b on Saturday 17th January 19:40

nickfrog

21,193 posts

218 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Fortunately, not everyone is into styling.

Escort3500

11,919 posts

146 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
Fortunately, not everyone is into styling.
If I was going to spend £30k + on a car I think it's reasonable to expect it to look pretty good.