RE: BMW M5 (E39): PH Buying Guide

RE: BMW M5 (E39): PH Buying Guide

Author
Discussion

saturnuranus

80 posts

189 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
The Article said:
However, the plastic tensionors used on this engine will deteriorate, so need to be checked and factored in as a service item on higher mileage examples. Expect to pay £50 plus fitting for a new tensioner.
This bit's not quite right :P

The tensioners are the fancy hydraulic M ones instead of the regular spring found on non-M's of the time, and they are of course made of metal. A tensioner costs about £70 from a dealer and takes about 5 minutes to fit with a coffee break in the middle. Symptoms of an iffy tensioner are a startup rattle, not too dissimilar to the noise Vanos can make. I imagine the two noises are confused often - I did.

The plastic chain guides are also prone to failure as mentioned on higher mileage cars with bits of these often found in the sump. Fitting new guides requires the front of the engine to be stripped so it's quite involved and will certainly cost more than £50.

Matt UK

17,738 posts

201 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Perfection as far as I'm concerned. Still look back at my old e39 530i as my favourite all-rounder and on a day to day basis I think the M5 just takes all the good points up a couple of notches.

If I had deeper pockets or a lesser commute, this would suit very nicely indeed.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Motorrad said:
TheAngryDog said:
You say things have moved on, but that doesn't mean that the E39 M5 cannot hold its own.
Driver involvement and enjoyment haven't moved anywhere and the E39 M5 arguably offers at least as much of that as it's modern equivalents.
Good point, well made! You can turn the DSC off for some real fun, and the car is so controllable. Tbh for its size, it is so well balanced and lets you know what its doing, even with 129k mile old suspension (new suspension coming soon).

Bigchiefmuffin said:
I had one of these for a couple of years back in 2002. Lovely car, though had problems with the vanos which was expensive to fix ( though done under warranty ). Back in those days, you could get a BMW warranty regardless of model or mileage for only about £600 - those were the days...

Exchanged it for a B10 V8S with 44k miles on it. Still have that car, now showing 198K miles. Been very reliable, though , as mentioned, the body work does start to rust.

While superficially similar, they are very different cars. The M5 is a supercar in a saloon body - brilliant at 10/10ths, but not so good going slower ( heavy clutch was a pain in traffic ). Alpina a real GT - better than M5 up to 9/10ths.

They are both great cars, catering to different needs. I've driven lots of more "modern" cars in the interim, but have always struggled to see any real improvements over these.
I don't find the clutch that heavy, and I find mine is happy bimbling along at 30mph / 40 mph.

njw1

2,076 posts

112 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
mikEsprit said:
Not for me. Looks like every other Bimmer, just has a special badge.


This is one of the main reasons I like the car, I like a car that doesn't look like its up to much but when you have a go against it you can't see which way it wentsmile. I fully agree with the comments on the e39 having an absolutely stonking chassis (apparently they didn't change the chassis design much when the e60 came out as the bmw engineers didn't see the need, true or not, I don't know?), I took my 535i for a good run on the weekend after not taking it far for a while (bloody weather!) and I forgot just how well it goes around the twistys, its more like a little sports car than an 1800kg saloon. I do think an e39 M5 is going to be my next car though and this is just tempting me even more.

Hereward

4,193 posts

231 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
njw1 said:
mikEsprit said:
Not for me. Looks like every other Bimmer, just has a special badge.


This is one of the main reasons I like the car...
Precisely. And it's a concept that a person will either entirely "get" or simply find impossible to comprehend.

11jhw

65 posts

161 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
I remember these M5's being Ring Taxi's on my first visit to the ring and after seeing them broadsiding with four up overtaking me like smoke machine's, I have always had a soft spot for them.

daytona365

1,773 posts

165 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
How can you not love something like this ? But what's all this talk of 'Failed rod bearings' ? Doesn't sound very nice !

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
How can you not love something like this ? But what's all this talk of 'Failed rod bearings' ? Doesn't sound very nice !
Basically some owners car's experience an issue with the coating wearing on the crank shaft bearings where the con rod attaches to it.

It's not a myth per say, but it's also not as common as some would have you believe.

RWD cossie wil

4,322 posts

174 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
daytona365 said:
How can you not love something like this ? But what's all this talk of 'Failed rod bearings' ? Doesn't sound very nice !
Basically some owners car's experience an issue with the coating wearing on the crank shaft bearings where the con rod attaches to it.

It's not a myth per say, but it's also not as common as some would have you believe.
Probably somthing to do with less careful owners not realizing the engines need regular oil top ups!

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
RWD cossie wil said:
TheAngryDog said:
daytona365 said:
How can you not love something like this ? But what's all this talk of 'Failed rod bearings' ? Doesn't sound very nice !
Basically some owners car's experience an issue with the coating wearing on the crank shaft bearings where the con rod attaches to it.

It's not a myth per say, but it's also not as common as some would have you believe.
Probably somthing to do with less careful owners not realizing the engines need regular oil top ups!
This and not thrashing from cold, using decent oil, not revving its bks off all the time etc.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Article Said said:
and parking sensors at the front in addition to the rear ones that were always standard.
Not true. Rear PDC was an option in 1999. Mine doesn't have rear PDC.

LewisR

678 posts

216 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
Article Said said:
and parking sensors at the front in addition to the rear ones that were always standard.
Not true. Rear PDC was an option in 1999. Mine doesn't have rear PDC.
My '99 M5 doesn't either but my '99 528i did. Go figure !

naefeart

142 posts

164 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
I loved my M5 but I did spend a fortune getting it into pristine condition and it wasn't poor to begin with. The biggest difference came from replacing all the suspension arms, bushes and bearings.

The game has moved on, but I still don't think BMW build cars (or interiors!) as well as the E39.


JD2329

481 posts

169 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
I've enjoyed two E39 M5s and would love another at some point. It would have to be a good one though. Asking prices for the best examples are getting too much for me...better value to keep my 728i for waft and pair with an E46 M3, or good 986/987 Boxster.

2stis

507 posts

175 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
The Article said:
while an Alcantara headlining was an option for pre-facelift cars and standard on post-facelift models.
Also not completely correct - still an option on facelift cars that came as part of the 'full leather' option. Unfortunately mine doesn't have it, but as a previous poster said, you can't get too hung up on getting a certain spec as there are not plentiful good cars out there to choose from.

Also, on the oil consumption, the talk on here reminded me to go and check the level on mine and it is still bang on the max line on the dipstick, exactly where I filled it to when I changed the oil about 3k miles ago. I've never once needed to top it up between changes but it never goes further than 6k between oil changes so perhaps with longer stints I might notice some loss?

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
2stis said:
The Article said:
while an Alcantara headlining was an option for pre-facelift cars and standard on post-facelift models.
Also not completely correct - still an option on facelift cars that came as part of the 'full leather' option. Unfortunately mine doesn't have it, but as a previous poster said, you can't get too hung up on getting a certain spec as there are not plentiful good cars out there to choose from.

Also, on the oil consumption, the talk on here reminded me to go and check the level on mine and it is still bang on the max line on the dipstick, exactly where I filled it to when I changed the oil about 3k miles ago. I've never once needed to top it up between changes but it never goes further than 6k between oil changes so perhaps with longer stints I might notice some loss?
Oil consumption is very much different across all cars. Mine uses about 1 litre to every 3k to 4k miles, depending on how its been driven. For a pre-facelift thats pretty good imo.

urquattroGus

1,849 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Or buy an x308 xjr instead, preferred that when both were new

urquattroGus

1,849 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Or buy an x308 xjr instead, preferred that when both were new

ARobinson

168 posts

150 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
Costs for mine(mostly inc fitting)

Thermostat £150
Oil service £100
New front brakes £400
Brake fluid change £50
New rear tyres £400
2 new suspension arms one front one rear(worn ball joints) £200
2 new drop links one front one rear £60
Pair of front arm bushes £100
Clutch flywheel and RMS(clutch was ok just did as preventative due to rms leak) £850
Gear linkage, gearbox oil etc) preventative £100
Exhaust brackets and mounts £300
Mafs(preventative) £150
Inspection 2 service: £350
New front tyres £270
Re spray bumpers and rear arches etc £800



DarkHorseTerence

583 posts

240 months

Thursday 5th February 2015
quotequote all
fantastic cars - had 3 of them the past 10 years and always as a daily driver. Utterly reliable, great in all conditions, will destroy a long haul, and still offer controllable fun on twisties. Versatile, and definitely shrink around you if you ask them to go. Currently have an 02 Individual and its the best all round car I've owned.......