RE: Shed Of The Week: Saab 9000

RE: Shed Of The Week: Saab 9000

Author
Discussion

NailedOn

3,114 posts

235 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Good shed.
I had a 2000 CSE with the high pressure turbo.
Went like the proverbial wotzit off a spade.
Really great seats with room for 5 adults.
My only SAAB and I wish that I had kept it longer.

Garett

1,626 posts

192 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
They are truly great cars, I had a 2.3 CSE LPT, and had it remapped to 240 bhp (260 lbft) and a set of Koni adjusatbles on it to help the old boat round the twisties. It was genuinely quick in a straight line, 3rd gear would take you from 30/40 mph onwards to almost 100mph. Without having to change gear there weren't many cars on the road that would keep up with it, I fondly remember once pulling a few cars lengths on an Integra Tye R coming off a dual carriageway roundabout, I don't think he expected it at all!

Shame this one is a poverty spec with steel wheels,velour trim and walnut missing from the dash. It does have a certain charm to it and will surely last for many years to come in its under-stressed form.

rallycross

12,800 posts

237 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
this really was a shed fail (sorry)

poverty spec model
wrong engine (2.3 is what we want)
horrible saloon body rather than more handsome 5 door
wrong colour

low mileage but who cares about that a sub £1k 9-5 2.3t with a nice spec and 150k miles will be a much better buy

smilo996

2,793 posts

170 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
How true:
Actually, GM began the careful and painstaking process of turning a quality company into a rubbish one some 11 years earlier, in 1989, when it took a 50 per cent share in Saab

I had one in the US for about 6 months, between an Explorer and a Dodge Intrepid. it felt a world away. It was well built and even though front wheel drive was fun to drive as well.

I worked in a commercial quarry and as with all rental cars it would have been rude not to thrash the wheels off it around the quarry roads. Never had any problems with it unlike the other two.

Just a real shame GM screwed Saab.

nicfaz

432 posts

230 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
JMF894 said:
You could have this instead................

Just sayin'

http://www.uksaabs.co.uk/UKS/viewtopic.php?f=17&am...
Wot he said. I like these, but there's far better options out there, even for shed money.


cheekyron

54 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
My least favourite SAAB of all time in poverty spec, builders van white and cheapo crappy wheel trims...

Have a lot of love and fond memories of the 93s and 900s my father had, shame these can no longer be had for shed money frown

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Shed said:
something as mad as this
Err, what in the name of all that's holy is that? Looks like two transversely-mounted two-stroke three-cylinders, in line with each other, somehow geared and pulley'd together to give a longitudinal output? Engineers, SAABheads - explain, please?

NiceCupOfTea

25,289 posts

251 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Not a fan of the spec, but the more poverty versions are still fun to drive. Once had a very used 2.0 non turbo auto with velous seats as a discourtesy carnand it was strangely likeable.

About 4 years ago I bought a 2.3T Anniversary - 200bhp, full leather/suede interior, climate control, heated seats, sensible miles, the only problem being lost synchro on 2nd. It lapped up the miles for 3 years without hesitation and has only been less reliable recently with less use.

It cost £750.

Brilliant cars.

NiceCupOfTea

25,289 posts

251 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
Shed said:
something as mad as this
Err, what in the name of all that's holy is that? Looks like two transversely-mounted two-stroke three-cylinders, in line with each other, somehow geared and pulley'd together to give a longitudinal output? Engineers, SAABheads - explain, please?
The Monster - 6 cylinder 2 stroke!

http://saabmuseum.com/en/saab-model/the-monster/

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
JMF894 said:
You could have this instead................

Just sayin'

http://www.uksaabs.co.uk/UKS/viewtopic.php?f=17&am...
you could have added a photo
(or maybe not - how do you make photobucket links work?)


just to show it's the hatch version


SAAB make the turbo accessible

airbags



Edited by saaby93 on Saturday 4th April 10:21

GrahamG

1,091 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
I had a 2.3 Turbo a while back and never liked it. My wife though adored the car, the best seats of anything she's sat in before or since.

For me though it felt barge-like.

UNTIL! I replaced the Saab with a Volvo C70 T5 which I loved. The 9000 though hadn't been sold - and when I got some interest a few weeks later it needed an MoT.

Getting back into the Saab after a month or two with the Volvo, a very quick car, and it felt spectacular, very, very quick indeed - Yes it was a big old bus but a bit of distance and most of my issues with it evaporated



RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
The Monster - 6 cylinder 2 stroke!

http://saabmuseum.com/en/saab-model/the-monster/
It would really help if someone could explain the mechanical disposition, what all those longitudinal pulleys do to those transverse engines, how the output gets turned, etc...

Brompty

153 posts

144 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Shed is up and down this year. Some times sublime, some times.... well this really. No, no, no.

SuperHangOn

3,486 posts

153 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
A good shed in that it looks a nice example of a well built car - owner who's had it yonks, low mileage etc.

It does absolutely nothing for me however. There are so many more interesting barges for a grand.

soad

32,901 posts

176 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
VolvoT5 said:
This one is doing absolutely nothing for me, and I'm usually a SAAB fan.

Nope.
Looks like a bland square wedge.

Oldwolf

935 posts

193 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
I worked for Volvo in the late 80's / early 90's and I remember taking in a 2.3 with bald front tyres, my abiding memory is wheelspin in the first 3 gears. Nice car to drive though, Volvo hadn't launched the 850 at the time and the 940/960 was a totally different animal.

Darsettian

74 posts

115 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
The car enthusiast in me cannot help like this. Does it make sense? Not a lot, not even for a grand. But...

But: they're few on our roads. They're pretty good cars. The brand is leftfield (I'm nothing if not there). There's a great deal of satisfaction to be had driving (what I take to be) a well looked after, older car.

I may not be inclined to make an offer, but I like it. I do.

griffin dai

3,201 posts

149 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
I've had three now smile Excellent cars.

1997 2.0 lpt anniversary (best car ive had....ever!!!)
1995 2.3 CDE fpt with stage 1 map

And a slightly bonkers stage 6 450+bhp 9000 Aero smile



Filthy quick....and well, just filthy.....like my women wink


VolvoT5

4,155 posts

174 months

Sunday 5th April 2015
quotequote all
There is something rather appealing about the hatchback that is just totally lacking in the saloon version.

Can anyone tell me what these are like for legroom for us 6ft 5in "powerfully built, company director" types?

bencollins

3,515 posts

205 months

Monday 6th April 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
NiceCupOfTea said:
The Monster - 6 cylinder 2 stroke!

http://saabmuseum.com/en/saab-model/the-monster/
It would really help if someone could explain the mechanical disposition, what all those longitudinal pulleys do to those transverse engines, how the output gets turned, etc...
"ihop kopplade med vinkelväxel" just two crankshafts put together via a bevel gear to drive an ordinary gearbox.
"well tuned with double barrelled carburetters" 140 hp
the standard arrangement: