Charge or jump start?

Author
Discussion

Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Monday 5th October 2015
quotequote all
I've been recovering from an operation for the last 6 weeks and my weekend MK 3 MX5 has been in the garage for all of that time as a result. And the battery is flat. The remote control unlocks the car and all the warning lights come on when I tried the ignition...just wondering whether it's totally dead and needs jump starting or whether I can buy a charger and that will sort it out?


HustleRussell

24,711 posts

160 months

Monday 5th October 2015
quotequote all
Either really. It's a modern car so I'd have no qualms about just jumping it and taking it for a drive.

Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Fair enough, thanks. Never had a car go flat on me before; not even one left in the garage a month or so.

shake n bake

2,221 posts

207 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
A battery charger will give it a thorough charge, if you do jump it, leaving it to just idle does close to nothing. Driving it's ok though.

Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
shake n bake said:
A battery charger will give it a thorough charge, if you do jump it, leaving it to just idle does close to nothing. Driving it's ok though.
True - at the moment I probably can't drive it far so maybe a trip to Halfords for a charger is the best option at the moment. Ta for the reminder.

Galveston

715 posts

199 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
shake n bake said:
if you do jump it, leaving it to just idle does close to nothing.
It should charge very well at idle.

kambites

67,580 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Galveston said:
shake n bake said:
if you do jump it, leaving it to just idle does close to nothing.
It should charge very well at idle.
yes Old cars with dynamos were hopeless at idle but a modern alternator should be capable of simply increasing the load on the engine to get the desired output regardless of engine speed.

However, a good variable-voltage battery conditioner (as opposed to a simple charger which isn't the same thing at all) is capable of recovering a battery which a fixed-voltage alternator cannot. It's a useful thing to have anyway.

normalbloke

7,461 posts

219 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Buy a Ctek from fleabay if you can. They're currently (sic) the best out there for a charge or to leave attached for a maintenance charge. They also have recovery capabilities to desulphate heavily discharged batteries. If you're in no rush, give it a good charge. As a caution note, some modern vehicles do not respond favourably to jump starts. While the chance is very slim, there have been some electronic component failures due to jump starting. The VW T5 and the new Ford Ranger are two.

Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for the tips, guys - very useful!

E65Ross

35,089 posts

212 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Another vote for a ctek. I have the MXS5.0 charger and it's bloody great. Also been recovering from an op which meant my licence has been revoked for 12 months, I've had friends drive it periodically but the charger has stayed on pretty much every time the car isn't in use and the car has started faultlessly every time.

Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for that - just reading about the CTEKs now. My old Camaro never seemed to mind being stuck away for a few weeks - the worst that would happen is the electronic trip counter would reset to zero but it would always start first time. The MX5 I guess has a far smaller battery. Lesson learned! Looks like a CTEK is a good idea.

vanordinaire

3,701 posts

162 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
My daughter's Fiesta blows a fuse for the immobiliser every time it's jump started with jump leads (and the battery regularly goes flat if the doors are left locked for any length of time) PITA.

kambites

67,580 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
I've got a CTEK and am very happy with it. It's recovered at least two batteries that I would have thrown away before I had it so in that respect it's paid for itself. Regularly conditioning my Elise's battery (the Elise alarm is renowned for killing the battery) has taken it from lasting 3 days before it goes flat to being perfectly happy after two weeks. smile

100SRV

2,134 posts

242 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
If you've depleted the battery enough to require a jump start then at the earliest opportunity you should remove the battery and charge it for around 20 hours to ensure that it is fully replenished.

Lead acid batteries charge best at a rate of C/10 where C is the capacity in Ampere hours; for a 105 Ah battery this would be 10.5 Amps.

http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/chargin...

"During the constant-current charge, the battery charges to about 70 percent in 5–8 hours; the remaining 30 percent is filled with the slower topping charge that lasts another 7–10 hours. The topping charge is essential for the well-being of the battery and can be compared to a little rest after a good meal. If continually deprived, the battery will eventually lose the ability to accept a full charge and the performance will decrease due to sulfation. The float charge in the third stage maintains the battery at full charge."



Flip Martian

Original Poster:

19,702 posts

190 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
All useful, thanks guys - I knew this was the right place to post. CTEK on order. smile

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Flip Martian said:
My old Camaro never seemed to mind being stuck away for a few weeks - the worst that would happen is the electronic trip counter would reset to zero but it would always start first time. The MX5 I guess has a far smaller battery.
Or more always-on electronics giving a bigger drain.

kambites

67,580 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
I've never read of anyone else finding the same but I've always found cabriolets with alarms drain the battery at a ridiculous rate; I assume the alarms have to operate differently to cope with being activated when the roof is off?

shake n bake

2,221 posts

207 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
Galveston said:
It should charge very well at idle.
Well my experience says all the cars that go flat on the forecourt and are left to idle for hours to try and charge then generally last a few days at best. If charged properly then they are fine for weeks after.
Anything Japanese, Korean or fords are the worst culprits.
Something to do with only producing enough power on idle to keep it running apparently.

kambites

67,580 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
If that's the case, they have a really crappy charging implementation. Surely the whole point of having an alternator over a dynamo is that engine speed has no bearing on electrical output?

I wonder if not charging the battery at idle is another one of these adft things they do to fool the emissions tests? NEDC spends quite a lot of time idling and I bet they don't check that the battery is in the same state of charge at the start and end of the test.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Tuesday 6th October 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
Surely the whole point of having an alternator over a dynamo is that engine speed has no bearing on electrical output?
It does have bearing on the output - but nowhere near as much as a dynamo.