RE: Mercedes-AMG C63 Coupe: Review

RE: Mercedes-AMG C63 Coupe: Review

Author
Discussion

aston addict

426 posts

159 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
I would easily pick this over a M4. And this coming from a life long BMW fan.

BMW have lost their way - my last BM was a E46 330 sport coupe, in my eyes the last good looking BMW. For the outside, and especially the interiors, BMW now are behind the competition. And the demographics of their customers no longer make them exclusive in any shape or form.

Maybe it's being the wrong side of 40, but the C63 coupe just seems far more appealing. You can forgive a couple of interior shortcomings for the sound of the engine. And it looks far better resolved than the standard coupe.

Clivey

5,110 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
32.8 MPG from a petrol V8? Even if it gets 26/27 in reality that's, dare I say it, "sensible". Once my friend Mr Depreciation has given these a severe kick in the goolies, I might have to have another look!

Cacatous

3,163 posts

274 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
The glass area seems to be too high up the car. It looks perched on top of the car rather than being part of the design.


Coldfuse

518 posts

195 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
The back end looks like a Vauxhall Insignia...

TNH

559 posts

148 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
That interior blingtastic.

Powertain sounds good but would still rather have the M4.

kbee540

197 posts

209 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
aston addict said:
I would easily pick this over a M4. And this coming from a life long BMW fan.

BMW have lost their way - my last BM was a E46 330 sport coupe, in my eyes the last good looking BMW. For the outside, and especially the interiors, BMW now are behind the competition. And the demographics of their customers no longer make them exclusive in any shape or form.

Maybe it's being the wrong side of 40, but the C63 coupe just seems far more appealing. You can forgive a couple of interior shortcomings for the sound of the engine. And it looks far better resolved than the standard coupe.
Totally agree with you Aston Addict. There's nothing in the BMW range that I want. That's not unremarkable but for the fact that until July I have owned nothing but BMWs since 1997. I've had access to plenty of other metal, but always owned BMs.

I test drove the M4, M3, and C63 saloon. Whilst I chose something else entirely, the Merc was hugely more desirable than the Ms. It may not be able to 'beat' an M4 on a track, but there aren't that many racetracks along my daily commute or normal life. The performance it does have is much more accessible and the perceived quality of the interior was massively better. It's still been beaten with an ugly stick (ok - styling is subjective and I did own an M135i in the recent past so what do I know), but as a thing to own and enjoy it monstered the BM.

Maybe it's just me (and age), but even brand new BMWs seem 'old'. The external designs age terribly, the interior design is yawn-inducing, and you can only seem to enjoy them whilst thrashing the nuts off of them.

seefarr

1,472 posts

187 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
So AMGs have an "M" button now?!?


Wills2

22,896 posts

176 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Manual gear selection I would imagine?

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

169 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Correct!

There is a configurable 'Individual' setting on the AMG Dynamic whatsit and others - I think the GT but I'll have to check - have an AMG 'hot key' in the style of M that brings up pre-saved favourites. But the C doesn't get that.

Dan

oap750

36 posts

175 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
£80k on a Datsun with a 550hp V6
£60k on a BMW with a 430hp V6
or
£60k on an AMG with a 500hp holy grail V8

V8 for me every time.

Wills2

22,896 posts

176 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Straight 6! FFS.....And that's some discount you're getting on the Merc.

R8VXF

6,788 posts

116 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
oap750 said:
£80k on a Datsun with a 550hp V6
£60k on a BMW with a 430hp V6
or
£60k on an AMG with a 500hp holy grail V8

V8 for me every time.
£55k for a supercharged 6.2l V8 with 576BHP...

Till135

116 posts

134 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Is it only me that is annoyed by the fact that Mercedes can't be bothered to place the configuration for gearbox etc to the RIGHT of the controller? When driving the car, you can't actually see the selector switches due to them being on the left of the controller. This is the same as the previous S Class which had the flip up keypad for phone etc hinging from the right and therefore designed for left hand drive markets. It later became hinged from the left.
It's just a bit offensive I think for a car of this price to not be configured correctly for right hand drive markets.
Regardless of that and the fact that I used to have a C63 Coupe, I would rather have a C63 507 coupe or a current M4 with MSport exhaust. Just looks a bit big, high and blobby.

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

188 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
It's a trivial thing in context of all the wonderful technology and barnstoming performance, let along the personality of the car, but I just could not live with the ipad stuck randomly on my dashboard.

I can't help feeling the last C63 will be the 'classic', notwithstanding the new one being bigger, better, faster, etc.

sealtt

3,091 posts

159 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
R8VXF said:
£55k for a supercharged 6.2l V8 with 576BHP...
But at what cost?

R8VXF

6,788 posts

116 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
sealtt said:
R8VXF said:
£55k for a supercharged 6.2l V8 with 576BHP...
But at what cost?
55k. And a Vauxhall badge. And when I bought it a 100k/lifetime warranty.

T16OLE

2,946 posts

192 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
B
oap750 said:
£80k on a Datsun with a 550hp V6
£60k on a BMW with a 430hp V6
or
£60k on an AMG with a 500hp holy grail V8

V8 for me every time.
The BMW doesn't have a V6

joscal

2,080 posts

201 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Another lifelong M driver here and have to say that really floats my boat which the M3/M4 doesn't.

Anyone else think it sounds like the E92 with the M performance exhaust?


Wills2

22,896 posts

176 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
joscal said:
Another lifelong M driver here and have to say that really floats my boat which the M3/M4 doesn't.

Anyone else think it sounds like the E92 with the M performance exhaust?

No, because there isn't that induction roar or 8400revs.....the S65 with a decent exhaust is one of the best sounding engines out there, just like its big brother the S85, these turbo cars don't come close.



Scottie - NW

1,290 posts

234 months

Wednesday 11th November 2015
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
What you're not factoring in is the discounts available and the APR on the finance, the M4 is 8-10k cheaper spec for spec than the C63S as an example the C63S specced as your M4 is 84k vs. 74k, the M4 is going to be miles cheaper to rent in the real world. (lets face it that's how they will be sold)

Edited by Wills2 on Tuesday 10th November 12:36
Could anyone expand a little more on that please? About how these will sell in the real world.

Do only a few buy outright, do most put some cash down then pay monthly lease over 24 or 36 months?