RE: Porsche 911 R images leaked

RE: Porsche 911 R images leaked

Author
Discussion

mattwilko

70 posts

123 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
mattwilko said:
Icehanger said:
WCZ said:
nice, expected to be around £300k though?
238K apparently....Neighbour apparently has his name down on one!!eek
I saw about that figure but in dollars. Less than €200,000 I'm hearing.

If the GT3 RS is £131k, surely this can't be too much more than £150-175k?
With the RS selling for ~£250k then they can put it up for any price they want. £200k punt.
I agree that they could, but that's not how they price their cars, at least until now. Based on the market, they could have priced the GT3 RS at £200k and the GT4 at £100k, but they didn't.

Sam All

3,101 posts

102 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
Maybe but exactLy what some of us want mr Stott . A decent sized car , manual gearbox , no wings and cage everywhere , rare enough to be desirable and not lose your shirt on and invisible to non car nuts [once stickers are removed].
Extremely excited here at least .

For those that want visual drama next gt3 will be naturally aspirated and have a manual option]
You a special Mr Doom, but would the uptake have been as good in the normal market most of us are familiar with? Art,investment or car?


DMC2

1,834 posts

212 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Looks like a bit of a disappointing parts bin special. Not one new component? (apart from a manual box being attached to the GT3 engine.

What about weight? Have they saved any? Or is it just a manual GT3 with no aero.

9e 28

9,410 posts

202 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Brill but £238k? Complete marketing geniuses and the buyers thanking them lol!!!!!!!!!

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
DMC2 said:
What about weight? Have they saved any? Or is it just a manual GT3 with no aero.
That's the question that I came here to ask.

The article in Autocar doesn't say. And I'm wondering if they got the weight below 1400kg.

Tenebrae

46 posts

119 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Fake because old PCM.

Sam All

3,101 posts

102 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
I believe plenty of carbon fibre. PCCB's. No rws, no PDK, no wing, no glass windows, no rear seats. Narrower wheels/tyres etc will all help to keep weight to circa 1300 kg

Chris Stott

13,387 posts

198 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
Chris Stott said:
I'm a massive Porsche fan, but this is somewhat underwhelming.

Unless there's something hidden in the spec sheets it's nothing more than a GT3RS with a manual box and no rear wing. Hardly Earth shattering.
Maybe but exactLy what some of us want mr Stott . A decent sized car , manual gearbox , no wings and cage everywhere , rare enough to be desirable and not lose your shirt on and invisible to non car nuts [once stickers are removed].
Extremely excited here at least .

For those that want visual drama next gt3 will be naturally aspirated and have a manual option .
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure it will be a fabulous car – how can it not be given it’s 9x% GT3RS.

But couldn’t Porsche have been a bit more ambitious… More effort to reduce weight, for example?

The ‘no wings or cage’, bit I like - makes more discrete as a road car. But then they go with the ‘Maxpower’ stickers, which completely ruins the illusion. And it needs a ducktail.

Maybe there’s more to it than an RS with no rear wing and a manual box. But as it stands it seems a bit lazy to me.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
9e 28 said:
Brill but £238k? Complete marketing geniuses and the buyers thanking them lol!!!!!!!!!
Yup, see also £100k for fancy Boxster/Cayman cars. But you can't blame Porsche for building them if customers are willing to pay so much over the odds.

wtdoom

3,742 posts

209 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Sam All said:
You a special Mr Doom, but would the uptake have been as good in the normal market most of us are familiar with? Art,investment or car?
Do you know what , I hope I get one I really do . I'm more excited about this than a 918 for example , it's so much more usable .
But when I think about it I almost get the impression this is what the gts would be if not for emissions crap . In fact don't be surprised if it's like the sport classic and gts . Remember how after the sport classic there was basically the same thing but called gts? I'm hoping the next gts will have many ideas from this car but perhaps without the exotic materials and engine . The next GT3 however will have the option of a manual and will maintain a naturally aspirated engine . I wish they could just release this as normal car . It's stupid to me .
People need to buy more manuals then I'm convinced they'd make more like this .

justboxsters

135 posts

167 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
What sort of clown is lying £250k for that?

Porche (and mainly the people caught up in the porch bubble) need to get a grip.


kambites

67,584 posts

222 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Certainly the most desirable 911 model for me... over twice the price of a GT3?

Chris Stott

13,387 posts

198 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
I'm hoping the next gts will have many ideas from this car but perhaps without the exotic materials and engine .

I wish they could just release this as normal car . It's stupid to me .
This. 100%.

justboxsters said:
What sort of clown is lying £250k for that?
£250k? £170ish is the number I've seen.

And it's hardly a Porsche only bubble... go look at the prices of Ferrari's. Or old Fords.

RemyMartin

6,759 posts

206 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
justboxsters said:
What sort of clown is lying £250k for that?

Porche (and mainly the people caught up in the porch bubble) need to get a grip.
Quite. I honesty think Porsche could sell a fresh steaming dung if they marketed it and put a badge on it.

wtdoom

3,742 posts

209 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure it will be a fabulous car – how can it not be given it’s 9x% GT3RS.

But couldn’t Porsche have been a bit more ambitious… More effort to reduce weight, for example?

The ‘no wings or cage’, bit I like - makes more discrete as a road car. But then they go with the ‘Maxpower’ stickers, which completely ruins the illusion. And it needs a ducktail.

Maybe there’s more to it than an RS with no rear wing and a manual box. But as it stands it seems a bit lazy to me.
I'm not sure if too hardcore would work , think that will be the new gt3s role . This will come in at 1250ish kg [dry] and apparently has even less sound insulation than the rs .
My understanding [which is probably wrong , lol] is that it's more about interaction rather than outright track pace . I think some creature comforts are unfortunately expected . However remember that a tiny little 964 weighs in at 1350 to 1375din [incidentally about the same as this giant car packed with all modern safety features] puts in into perspective a little .
I think with current legislation there's only so much you can do .'the trick that I think Porsche ARE missing in my opinion is with the rs . The rs should be stripped to death , no carpets nothing [worse than a speciale] , that's how I'd do it . I'd make the base gt3 like the 73 rs touring and the gt3rs like the 73 RSR [almost].

Edited by wtdoom on Monday 29th February 15:09

wtdoom

3,742 posts

209 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
The "Must Have" type. Or Flippers.
That's so unfair mr Murphy .

ChocolateFrog

25,453 posts

174 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Is all this hype based on an Autocar photoshop?

If so they have form inventing new cars based purely on speculation and someone who's handy with Photoshop.


Chris Stott

13,387 posts

198 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
I'm not sure if too hardcore would work , think that will be the new gt3s role . This will come in at 1250ish kg [dry] and apparently has even less sound insulation than the rs .
My understanding [which is probably wrong , lol] is that it's more about interaction rather than outright track pace . I think some creature comforts are unfortunately expected . However remember that a tiny little 964 weighs in at 1350 to 1375din [incidentally about the same as this giant car packed with all modern safety features] puts in into perspective a little .
I think with current legislation there's only so much you can do .'the trick that I think Porsche ARE missing in my opinion is with the rs . The rs should be stripped to death , no carpets nothing [worse than a speciale] , that's how I'd do it . I'd make the base gt3 like the 73 rs touring and the gt3rs like the 73 RSR [almost].
A new limited run Porsche is always something to get excited about as they are almost always fantastic cars. The problem (challenge) is they have already made the GT3RS... and the R isn't really that different IMHO... hence my disappointment at the specs mentioned today.

If the RS had been a proper, lightweight track car that could be used on the road if entirely essential, there would be room for the R as a more civilised road version. But as it stands, they both seem to be sitting on the same piece of tarmac (manual box aside).

My old 996 weighs less than a 964... but then the doors don't shut with the same authoritative thunk either!

wtdoom

3,742 posts

209 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
A new limited run Porsche is always something to get excited about as they are almost always fantastic cars. The problem (challenge) is they have already made the GT3RS... and the R isn't really that different IMHO... hence my disappointment at the specs mentioned today.

If the RS had been a proper, lightweight track car that could be used on the road if entirely essential, there would be room for the R as a more civilised road version. But as it stands, they both seem to be sitting on the same piece of tarmac (manual box aside).

My old 996 weighs less than a 964... but then the doors don't shut with the same authoritative thunk either!
again , I agree .
I like the idea of a softer manual rs style car for the road but yes indeed the rs itself should be proper raw

mattwilko

70 posts

123 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
unsprung said:
DMC2 said:
What about weight? Have they saved any? Or is it just a manual GT3 with no aero.
That's the question that I came here to ask.

The article in Autocar doesn't say. And I'm wondering if they got the weight below 1400kg.
I've seen 1325kg quoted somewhere.