RE: Mercedes-AMG C43/63: Driven

RE: Mercedes-AMG C43/63: Driven

Author
Discussion

Vocht

1,631 posts

165 months

Monday 6th June 2016
quotequote all
Not that I'm complaining but it really does look almost identical to the S63 Cabriolet which is £130k+ new.



This new C class is also one of the few cars I think looks much much better as convertible opposed to coupe form.

Bladedancer

1,283 posts

197 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
Vocht said:
Not that I'm complaining but it really does look almost identical to the S63 Cabriolet which is £130k+ new.



This new C class is also one of the few cars I think looks much much better as convertible opposed to coupe form.
C E and S class all look alike. Merc designed one (E) and then shrunk it 10% to get C and enlarged it 10% to get S.

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

189 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
Vocht said:
This new C class is also one of the few cars I think looks much much better as convertible opposed to coupe form.
I'm not so sure, I think the Coupe roof is more forgiving on that sloped rear end and has a parellel with the deep swage line in the sides...



Although I don't think either coupe or cabriolet are what you'd call elegant / attractive cars, they're both too chintzy with too much going on - much like the equivalent BMWs. The A5 (in all forms) has a very simple form which actually makes it more classy. I know the new vs. used argument is irrelevant, but this is used DB9 Volante territory which has similar performance and is considerably better looking...