MOT advisory?

Author
Discussion

MrAndyW

Original Poster:

508 posts

149 months

Tuesday 12th July 2016
quotequote all
Advisory notice item(s)
no smoke (emissions) peak detected, system too clean.

Just doing an MOT check on a potential car purchase, This was on the MOT carried out on 8th June 2016.
can anybody tell me what it means please. and is it anything to worry about.
Never seen anything like that before, It's a 3.0L v6 Jag diesel.
Thanks Andy.

Krikkit

26,534 posts

182 months

Tuesday 12th July 2016
quotequote all
It's fine. It means that the smoke part of the emission test was totally clean (i.e. you have a DPF)

MG CHRIS

9,084 posts

168 months

Tuesday 12th July 2016
quotequote all
Nothing to worry about very common with new diesels.

legless

1,693 posts

141 months

Tuesday 12th July 2016
quotequote all
It's basically a note rather than an advisory, to advise that the diesel smoke emissions were lower than that detectable by the testing equipment.

It's fairly common for that to happen on DPF-equipped diesels that are in good health.

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

234 months

Tuesday 12th July 2016
quotequote all
Imagine said vehicle develops a fault involving copious amounts of black smoke being emitted from the exhaust, and DVSA (somehow) get involved (it's hard to miss, after all)... They will go after the MoT Tester with a view to the last MoT being "dodgy" on the assumption that (s)he took a brown envelope to pass the car (among other possibilities wink ) .

It's a backside-covering exercise by the tester on finding there were no particulate emissions that could be recorded (he/she will have a copy of the print out on file to verify this), and is nothing at all to be concerned about smile .

Mr Tidy

22,382 posts

128 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
This advisory nonsense is a load of bcensoreds IMHO!

If the test result is very good then why the fcensoredk is it an advisory? banghead

It's a bit like the "couldn't see behind the undertrays" garbage - the undertrays were a standard fitment - if there is nothing wrong why is having an OEM undertray an advisory FFS?

I had an old Mazda a couple of years ago and every year it got 2 advisories for delaminating number plates that were said to be clearly legible - so if you can read them why are they advisories?

Looking for work soon maybe?................

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
I had an advisory for, 'CV boot may let in dirt.' (the tester explained that it was O.K. but this type usually happens to this model but is fine at moment).

I also had rust on exhaust cover, a small piece of metal that is basically a vanity piece.

I did see a test report for a car where is said, 'cat in place but likely to be removed after test.' (how would they know that fully)





Edited by The Spruce goose on Wednesday 13th July 04:31

MrAndyW

Original Poster:

508 posts

149 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies.
Like you say it's crazy to to put down somethng that isn't a fault.
Just had me a bit worried because I'd never seen anything like that before,worth looking at the car now.
Thanks again.

mcford

819 posts

175 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
If no smoke was detected the machine will keep prompting for more engine accelerations until it detects some, there's no point in doing this, but without a smoke reading the machine won't generate a report. To get over this lack of a smoke report the procedure is to fill out a manual declaration, file it with the emissions reports and advise it on the MOT paperwork.

When the testing station gets a visit, these will be looked at along with the MOT paperwork and any shortcomings will be noted, which could affect the testing stations ranking score.

Denis O

2,141 posts

244 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
It just shows what total cobblers the advisory system is.

The problem is that prospective purchasers, get so hung up on advisories, that it can put them off looking at a car. How many for sale ads do you see, "just passed MOT, no advisories". Pretty much every ad.

It's only the opinion of 1 man, the tester, and that's all. Time it was stopped in my opinion.

55palfers

5,911 posts

165 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
Any ideas on how the concept of "Advisories" came into being?

Was it on the back of any EU initiatives or a completely home grown thing?

Trabi601

4,865 posts

96 months

Wednesday 13th July 2016
quotequote all
Pass and advise has been part of MOT testing for as long as I can remember... Why does everything you don't agree with have to be linked back to the EU? Who gets the blame after we leave?

jambo103

84 posts

140 months

Tuesday 27th June 2017
quotequote all


Sounds legit!

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Tuesday 27th June 2017
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
This advisory nonsense is a load of bcensoreds IMHO!

If the test result is very good then why the fcensoredk is it an advisory? banghead

It's a bit like the "couldn't see behind the undertrays" garbage - the undertrays were a standard fitment - if there is nothing wrong why is having an OEM undertray an advisory FFS?

I had an old Mazda a couple of years ago and every year it got 2 advisories for delaminating number plates that were said to be clearly legible - so if you can read them why are they advisories?

Looking for work soon maybe?................
Your opinion is far from humble. Nor is it informed. Better to keep quiet.

Rich_W

12,548 posts

213 months

Tuesday 27th June 2017
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Your opinion is far from humble. Nor is it informed. Better to keep quiet.
There's another thread where he starts on like a ranting ninny about advisories, as if they are a personal affront to his dignity laugh

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Tuesday 27th June 2017
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
It's a bit like the "couldn't see behind the undertrays" garbage - the undertrays were a standard fitment - if there is nothing wrong why is having an OEM undertray an advisory FFS?
This is why, you fking cretin.
https://mattersoftesting.blog.gov.uk/horror-story-...

Mr Tidy

22,382 posts

128 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Many thanks for your invaluable input and exceptional social skills!

Thankfully I have no need of an angry dad car - I just try to avoid them at all costs.

But a reasonable, measured reply might be helpful - so hopefully someone with half a brain may help out.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
TooMany2cvs said:
Many thanks for your invaluable input and exceptional social skills!

Thankfully I have no need of an angry dad car - I just try to avoid them at all costs.

But a reasonable, measured reply might be helpful - so hopefully someone with half a brain may help out.
Here's a clue: The detail that it was a Zafira in that article is not the point.

Flyingowl

6 posts

71 months

Friday 8th June 2018
quotequote all
Hi am also looking at a potential car which has came up with the following advisory .
"Unable to detect emissions at time of test "

Can anyone shed any light on this please .