Revo's Mustang 'Ecobeast': PH Videoblog
The acceptable face of the four-cylinder Ford Mustang? With a little help from Revo Technik Dan makes the case
Truth is though Mustangs have always been sold with smaller engines, and in huge numbers back in their Stateside home market. And with a version of the 2.3-litre Ecoboost engine shared with the Focus RS the 'base' four-cylinder Mustang you can now buy here certainly does the numbers. Whether you're looking at performance or running costs it possibly makes a Mustang a car you can buy with your heart AND your head.
To help make that case stronger still British-based tuner Revo Technik has been branching out from its core business of upgrade packages for VW group cars with a new range of products for both the Focus RS and the Mustang. Here we have the latter with Revo's Stage 1 tuning package that, as you'll see, puts an interesting twist on the comparison between four-cylinder Mustang and its V8 big brother. Enough to make you want one? Full review to follow; for now here's Dan's videoblog with his first impressions...
Watch the video here.
I'd be more interested to know the numbers behind the stage 2 revo package. It might be closer price-wise to the v8, but I'm guessing it would be quite a bit better in terms of performance. The stage 1 4 cylinder revo package already beats the v8 in torque, so I'm really curious about it.
Downside for me is the size of it. It wont fit a standard UK garage (not much will), and even if you could squeeze it in, those doors may mean escaping through either the sunroof (do they come with them?), or Dukes-of-Hazzard style.
I'd rather the Focus RS with a tweak or two, but then they're different cars aren't they.
On a serious note, I get what you say about wanting the V8 over the ecoboost, but is that because we are brainwashed into it.
The reality is that, other than noise, and perhaps a little bit of immediate throttle response, the Revo car does the job admirably, and it will be interesting when Dan tries a RHD version with a Stage 2 kit, exhaust etc on; I predict that it will be a different kettle of fish and will alter our perceptions of the 'poverty spec' engine....
On a serious note, I get what you say about wanting the V8 over the ecoboost, but is that because we are brainwashed into it.
The reality is that, other than noise, and perhaps a little bit of immediate throttle response, the Revo car does the job admirably, and it will be interesting when Dan tries a RHD version with a Stage 2 kit, exhaust etc on; I predict that it will be a different kettle of fish and will alter our perceptions of the 'poverty spec' engine....
Otherwise arguably without its V8, its USP, its just a wide body, possibly ungainly, not so well built facsimile, with a 4cyl engine like everything else on the road. All the minuses with non of the pluses...
Mustang V8 = Well executed BBQ with a fine selection of meat
Mustang Turbo 4 = 2.3 litres of fresh steaming cat excrement
Mustang V8 = Well executed BBQ with a fine selection of meat
Mustang Turbo 4 = 2.3 litres of fresh steaming cat excrement
Thankfully the V8 GT comes with the options to turn off both TC & ASC.
On a serious note, I get what you say about wanting the V8 over the ecoboost, but is that because we are brainwashed into it.
The reality is that, other than noise, and perhaps a little bit of immediate throttle response, the Revo car does the job admirably, and it will be interesting when Dan tries a RHD version with a Stage 2 kit, exhaust etc on; I predict that it will be a different kettle of fish and will alter our perceptions of the 'poverty spec' engine....
Mustang V8 = Well executed BBQ with a fine selection of meat
Mustang Turbo 4 = 2.3 litres of fresh steaming cat excrement
The reality is that, other than noise, and perhaps a little bit of immediate throttle response, the Revo car does the job admirably, and it will be interesting when Dan tries a RHD version with a Stage 2 kit, exhaust etc on; I predict that it will be a different kettle of fish and will alter our perceptions of the 'poverty spec' engine....
- Sound / 'feel'
- Throttle response
- "Jerk" (the instantaneous kick-in-the-back you get from a high rate-of-change of torque) and sustained physical shove
- Economy
- Purchase cost
Typically smaller, boosted engines major on the last two, and more recently have been closing ground on the middle one. But they still cannot touch big-capacity nat-asp engines on the first two. So it's a score-draw, and depends whether your priorities are a car that ignites the nerve-endings in your soul** or one you can brag about in the pub and crow over the "scalps" you've taken...
* This isn't a track car, let's be very honest here.
** Says the man about to sacrifice one of the finest recent I-4 VTEC engines for a turbo-4 replacement, on the basis of #4 and #5!
I would buy the V8 for the difference in price but I bet this is still alright, I suspect Stage two will be nearer 400 bhp, Icurrently drive a V8 but I do like boosty 4 pots.
Moaning about a 360 bhp car, have we ever had it so good if this represents cat excrement ?
Mustang V8 = Well executed BBQ with a fine selection of meat
Mustang Turbo 4 = 2.3 litres of fresh steaming cat excrement
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff