RE: Visibility matters more than horsepower: TMIMW

RE: Visibility matters more than horsepower: TMIMW

Author
Discussion

jhonn

1,567 posts

150 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Yup - all-round visibility is a boon - hence the popularity of SUV's/4x4's with elevated driving positions. On the country roads round these parts these vehicles tend to carry more speed than low-slung cars, no matter how much power they have.

mac96

3,791 posts

144 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
To take the Saab example a few years further back.
The Saab 96 (1960s- to 70s) had unobstructive A pillars, but all the other pillars (behind driver's line of sight) were really strong- and it could do this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=810Fm2YZ-8I

I remember seeing them roll 360 degrees in rallies and just drive on.

Although the view out of a 900 was even better.

C124

456 posts

198 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
My W124 coupe has the best all round visibility of any car I've driven.

gooner1

10,223 posts

180 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
Good article.

New car designs mean drivers need to learn and adopt new driving techniques. A thick pillar, wide mirror and big hood mean you gotta bob, lean and weave about in your seat much more than, say, 10 to 30 years ago.
I'd sooner walk than look like a James Corden advert.

Speedgirl

291 posts

168 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Fear not those who cannot rotate their necks or remember where the corners of their cars are. Soon cars will a. have little cameras all over them to help you see and then b. use these to drive you itself. smile

Technomad

753 posts

164 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Yep: Toyota Aygo vs Peugeot 205: http://ducati.info/2006/12/08/safety-last/

It's also why my X5 isn't as far behind my 911 as you might think along a country road: its forward visibility is worth 100bhp at least…

Onehp

1,617 posts

284 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Yes, but as for enjoying the drive and having a sense of speed, good forward visibility and a low seating position is better imo.
More impresions and sensations within a given actual speed...

driftingphil

138 posts

148 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Didn't Subaru make it one of there key design features on the latest WRX STI.

To the point they move the mirror out the way.


andyalan10

404 posts

138 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
The thing I notice increasingly often as I drive a variety of modern cars is that at a complicated traffic light controlled junction I find I make a conscious effort to check out the layout of curbs before setting off, because as you get closer you just have to rely on memory of how far they protrude from the railings and keep left islands that are the only things that are visible.

I actually went through a 6ft 6 inch width restriction in an Evoque last week which I normally go through in a BMW X5, surely the Evoque is narrower, but the low slung seating position and high scuttle line made it seem much more challenging.

Andy

405dogvan

5,328 posts

266 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I have the pleasure of driving a huge range of cars - usually in and out of the workshop/around a carpark/into sometimes hard-to-fit spaces

Whilst that's no 'driving experience' I can tell you that some cars are FIENDISHLY hard to see out of and whilst almost everything has beepers, they're often quite st (see also many reversing cams).

Our parking spaces are surrounded with kerbs - this tends to trigger reversing sensors - as do nearby cars and the garage shutter doors and most everything else!

Add our rule that you don't move the seat/mirrors/wheel unless you cannot fit inside otherwise (at 6'5" I have to move SOMETHING) and you'll see me driving cars hanging out of the doors/windows and I'm not completely immune to some 'boom is ho' (ask any Netherlander!!)

SUVs are obviously worst - Audi TTs seem to assume their owners will never go backwards too - hell, I'll take vans out before those things tho.

"Security Glass" is another issue - indoors or in poor light it renders your interior mirror as total darkness and it's ever-more-popular for reasons I'll never understand!?

It is weird how some cars simply 'fit around you' more than others tho - it's not just size or wheel/seat position either, there's just a "perfect medium" for some people and some cars I think. Oddly I find it in things like A6s but then I did say I'm quite tall ;0

Edited by 405dogvan on Wednesday 14th December 01:33

Evilex

512 posts

105 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Last car was a Puma. The A pillars were dreadfully obstructive. More so because you sit quite close to them. Ruined an otherwise fun car.

Current car is a mk1 Multipla.
It's like driving a greenhouse (But not as much fun as the Puma)
Added benefit? No one's been car sick in it, because you're not being shaken about in the dark with no visual cues to your motion.

Randy Winkman

16,169 posts

190 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I used to pride myself in how easily I could reverse park my car into a road-side space. Now I shuffle back and forwards for 5 minutes like a dumbo. Sometimes even opening the door or getting out to see how I'm getting on.

alolympic

700 posts

198 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Agree 100%. Owning and driving this has been a breath of fresh air in more ways than one.


Ratten

215 posts

224 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Rangie Classic - lots of visibility, but as for carrying speed you need an exceptional set of plums for that and at least a Day Skipper ticket. Possibly Ocean.

Fun though!

coldel

7,899 posts

147 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Got me thinking this, have to say going outside and sitting in our two cars which are 15 years apart didn't notice much difference. I imagine some modern cars lack visibility, but pretty sure some old ones did too. My take on it, big A pillars block visibility, yep no brainer. Although tyres trump visibility in my view (scuse the pun!)

FocusRS3

3,411 posts

92 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Anyone comment of the visibility with a 1 series BMW ?

BrassMan

1,484 posts

190 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
FocusRS3 said:
Anyone comment of the visibility with a 1 series BMW ?
From the number I see using hard braking in L3? Terrible. Even worse than a Golf.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

219 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I think the issue here is a little confused, visibility does matter, but it is a function of styling (Glass area), regulation etc, BUT I think the main issue is car size, the bigger the car and they have all grown hugely over the last 20 years, the bigger the A pillar, the blind spot, the mirror, etc etc.

The part you notice when you get into an older car is the door is very close the windscreen is nearer and at a less raked angle, the mirror is small and nearer, the glass area is lower (or you are sat higher), and most of this is a direct result of the car being smaller in the first instance.

moanthebairns

17,946 posts

199 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I've been saying this since I started biking years ago. Actually before then when I rode a seat Leon with the ridiculous wipers that sat vertical reducing visibility even more. You can just disappear whilst on a motorbike due to a modern A pillar.



What a stupid design.

Dr Interceptor

7,800 posts

197 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Don't the pillars on most cars on sale now have airbags tucked inside them? I'd guess that's the reason most are so big now.