The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread Vol 3
Discussion
fausTVR said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
Or maybe not.Links to a blue light ambulance run.
Terzo123 said:
fausTVR said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
Or maybe not.Links to a blue light ambulance run.
Six Fiend said:
Terzo123 said:
fausTVR said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
Or maybe not.Links to a blue light ambulance run.
It's poor form, half of those cars he passed had no idea he was there.
Scobblelotcher said:
parabolica said:
Quite a few in this comp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO25tEIAiYM - some of them have been on here before but there is one in particular - 7.08 - in which a shorter version was shown here and it caused quite some debate*; this version has a lot of build up which may help explain things the earlier-posted clip doesn't.
*Guy in a Megane has an argy-bargy with a moped (DC'er) which results in the moped speeding off; guy gives chase and collides with an innocent party at some traffic lights.
Where was the accident?*Guy in a Megane has an argy-bargy with a moped (DC'er) which results in the moped speeding off; guy gives chase and collides with an innocent party at some traffic lights.
Can you link to the longer clip?
breadvan said:
Cliftonite said:
Wow, No debating who’s at fault there. Glad no serious injuries.If I had been the silver car would I have been hit, oh yes, can we learn from this, yep don't drive in Wales.
parabolica said:
Scobblelotcher said:
parabolica said:
Quite a few in this comp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO25tEIAiYM - some of them have been on here before but there is one in particular - 7.08 - in which a shorter version was shown here and it caused quite some debate*; this version has a lot of build up which may help explain things the earlier-posted clip doesn't.
*Guy in a Megane has an argy-bargy with a moped (DC'er) which results in the moped speeding off; guy gives chase and collides with an innocent party at some traffic lights.
Where was the accident?*Guy in a Megane has an argy-bargy with a moped (DC'er) which results in the moped speeding off; guy gives chase and collides with an innocent party at some traffic lights.
Can you link to the longer clip?
Greendubber said:
And the driver going far too quickly through small gaps in moving traffic, drive like that here and you won't pass the driving course.
It's poor form, half of those cars he passed had no idea he was there.
I'm pretty sure they knew he was there, it's not hard to miss a flipping ambulance sirens blazing and all that.It's poor form, half of those cars he passed had no idea he was there.
His driving seemed fine, they are trained to drive evasively through traffic and this shows in the video. Everybody caried on with business and the ambulance got to its destination on time without any issues. Probably even saved a life by getting there so fast.
4x4Tyke said:
1 looks like the usual "when two idiots meet"2 one of those suspicious ones that makes you wonder what led up to the video
The Dangerous Elk said:
1. What a TOTAL dick not letting him out....I do not like the brake check however
Eh? He hardly blocked him in. Are you supposed to slam the anchors on every time someone puts on a signal to move in front of you? The Jeep could easily have just accelerated a bit to move cleanly in front.quinny100 said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
1. What a TOTAL dick not letting him out....I do not like the brake check however
Eh? He hardly blocked him in. Are you supposed to slam the anchors on every time someone puts on a signal to move in front of you? The Jeep could easily have just accelerated a bit to move cleanly in front.Come across that all the time, providing L3 is clear I'd move over and let them out. However I also wouldn't personally just have sat on someones offside like that as it's easy for someone to either miss you or just pull into your path.
So no, I suppose technically the camera car didn't have to do anything but there's just being "right" and being considerate.
Like I say, 6 of one etc. etc.
quinny100 said:
Eh? He hardly blocked him in. Are you supposed to slam the anchors on every time someone puts on a signal to move in front of you? The Jeep could easily have just accelerated a bit to move cleanly in front.
Disagree, rude t
t whose sole intention was to get a DCW shot and be a pain in the arse. Slam on the anchors ?, you're having a larrf mateThe standards of drivers these days is truly dreadful, whatever happened to manners ?
If someone is indicating to merge in, just lift off the throttle for a few seconds to create a couple of car lengths gap and let them in, simples!
It makes absolutely no difference to your journey time, and mentally promotes a feeling of well being for all parties involved.
Just because you don't legally have to let someone in doesn't mean you shouldn't.
It makes absolutely no difference to your journey time, and mentally promotes a feeling of well being for all parties involved.
Just because you don't legally have to let someone in doesn't mean you shouldn't.
robbiekhan said:
If someone is indicating to merge in, just lift off the throttle for a few seconds to create a couple of car lengths gap and let them in, simples!
It makes absolutely no difference to your journey time, and mentally promotes a feeling of well being for all parties involved.
Just because you don't legally have to let someone in doesn't mean you shouldn't.
Exactly except the me me me factor, don't you dare get in front of me brigade.It makes absolutely no difference to your journey time, and mentally promotes a feeling of well being for all parties involved.
Just because you don't legally have to let someone in doesn't mean you shouldn't.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff