RE: Shed Of The Week: Mercedes-Benz SLK

RE: Shed Of The Week: Mercedes-Benz SLK

Author
Discussion

MajorMantra

1,309 posts

113 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
moustachebandit said:
bad things
laugh

paulwirral

3,154 posts

136 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
A thousand quid for a supercharged 2 seat hardtop convertible that doesn't rust like a mx5 , don't judge by the bodywork boys , ive paid more for a cam belt service on a nice car !
And with the upgrades I mentioned before they are faster than anyone believes , and the remap and pulley cost 300 quid , I kept a v8 m3 honest until Adenauer , he only got past me by crashing over the grass as all the newcomers do , but still , a thousand quid , I bought a coat the other week that cost more than that !

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
moustachebandit said:
The R170 SLK is an utter turd of a car.

Its also the reason why I would rather eat handfuls of my own st then own another Mercedes.

Quite literally the sttest car I have ever had the misfortune to own or drive. 8 years ago the OH was set on owning one and I couldn't convince her otherwise. Cant even give it away now.

Stupidly rusty.
Unreliable.
Poorly built.
Expensive to repair (even when buying parts from a scrap yard because mercedes either dont stock it or what your soul in exchange)
Literally no aftermarket support.
Non existent knowledge base within the owners clubs.
Self destructing interior.
Cheap plastics ... everywhere.
Substandard fixings used everywhere (almost every job that requires removing bolts is touch and go as to whether they snap off or round with the lightest of force).
Mind bendingly moronic design of drain channels means means they block and then redirect rain into the cabin or boot
Leaks petrol
Dash is design for LHD cars but adapted for RHD - so the central console is facing away from you.
Creaks and rattles over anything other than polished glass. Huge amount of road noise too.
Terrible ride quality - rock hard suspension that crashes over everything, yet wallows and falls over as soon as you get to a corner.
The steering feedback is comparable to a xbox controller.
It has the most useless 4 speed auto, which cant ever seem to work out what gear you need so just gives you all of them, interspersed with neck snapping gear changes.
The exhaust note is terrible - it sounds like someone trying to play the didgeridoo.
Interior seats are as comfortable as a park bench.
Super sensitive traction control that is so savage in how it cuts power its actually dangerous. Cant be turned off.
Its also crap on fuel.

I dont think I can convey exactly how much I hate this car. Avoid at all costs!
Sounds grim! But I bet you paid loads for it. I don't like them much either, but for a grand you become far more forgiving.


Early 2.8 Z3's are down to this now as well I hear.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
imy85 said:
subevo said:
Wife's ran one for 11years. Rust is now evident around the front arches.car cost £24000 when we bought it. It has never broken down.replaced about 3 batteries.broken suspension spring.abs sensor twice.ive never changed spark plugs air filter and only done 2 oil changes and still going strong.wife loves it to bits.i keep saying to get rid as it's £300 road tax and low 20's to the gallon in the town.plus side it's quite quick 0-60 supposed to be 7.2 secs.mercedes tested roof 10 thousand times approx to 10 years frequent use.so roofs are rarely a problem .id say to get one for a grand is a bargain.

You have owned a car for 11yrs and only ever changed the oil twice??? thats nothing to boast about.
That's what I thought when I read that too!

spreadsheet monkey

4,545 posts

228 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
iSore said:
for a grand you become far more forgiving.

Early 2.8 Z3's are down to this now as well I hear.
Interesting you mention the Z3. I think the Z3 is better loved than the SLK and will gain classic status more quickly. It has a simple canvas roof and retro styling, and well proven mechanicals.

I helped my dad look for a used Z3 last spring. He ended up buying a nice low mileage car with the 2.0 straight six.

The Z3M cars have fetched big money for a while now, but even a half decent 2.8 or 3.0 Z3 sells for a good few grand.

I just looked on eBay and Autotrader and only found one Z3 on there, and that was a Cat C with the 1.9 engine.

pSyCoSiS

3,601 posts

206 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
That is cheap for a facelift SLK.

I prefer the look of the earlier (1996 - 1998) model, which seem to have a better build quality about them.

Silver with red leather will do nicely.

230 Kompressor is a good enough engine, and will pull it along nicely.

paulwirral

3,154 posts

136 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Quentin Wilson was tipping decent examples as a better alternative to a mgb last year in a magazine I read . Amg 32 , I didn't buy one a couple of years ago for 5k , 40 thousand miles one owner fsh , I also sold a z3m coupe just before for 7.5k , it was cat d though !
I personally don't think a normal z3 drives any better or worse than a slk in the real world , I've owned a couple of examples of each , they are both pretty bad to be honest .

pSyCoSiS

3,601 posts

206 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Leins said:
CaptainRAVE said:
Leins said:
Another point to mention is that for those of us slightly on the lanky side, the SLK affords much more room in the driving position than most of its rivals. Z3/4, Boxster, MX5, early TT, etc are all a bit of a no-no for me, but I can quite comfortably fit in the Merc

Actually, is an SLK32 now the cheapest way into an AMG? Must go and check the classifieds
A 'cheap' AMG probably isn't the best way to go tbh.
I take your point, but it's not exactly what I meant. My question is more about whether the SLK32 has now taken over from the C36 as the entry point for purchasing proper AMGs, but it seems no, that is now possibly the W208 CLK55

FWIW I don't really hanker after convertibles myself, but do fancy a C32 Sport Coupe despite being LHD only and a bit on the rare side
SLK32 are increasing in value and rarity. Cheapest entry into AMG ownership would be the W210 E55 AMG, or more recently the C32 AMG. You can get one for around £3.5k. They aren't too complicated or expensive to run.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
I like them. My dad has one and it has been perfectly reliable.

I think they look good and are a decent cruiser. Not a sports car but preferable to the st Z3 and TT.

McFarnsworth

284 posts

150 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Always wanted a cheap one of these to do a silly road trip in to either the sahara or the north cape, or both.

Mostly because it's the only cheap, small-ish, rwd roadster I can cram my 6ft5 tall self into. It can even be a basic slow slk200, but it would need to be a manual though.

DickyC

49,810 posts

199 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
Mrs C has had hers for fourteen years and loves it. I get to clean it, put petrol in it and take it for the occasional Italian tune up. I've always thought it an underrated car.

It's a late '98 SLK230 we bought from a main dealer early in 2003 for £23,000 with FMBSH. It is now on 80,000 miles and is worth about 16p.

There is no rust to speak of.
It's perfectly reliable.
It's well built.
We've spent a bit on it but then we've had it for years. A cracked manifold was replaced under the warranty. I complained about the wheels blistering, MB supplied four new ones, we kept the old ones and now have a winter and summer set which are refurbished periodically. We had trouble with the gearbox which MB couldn't cure effectively - but charged a fortune for - so we took it to the tin sheds that are the local auto transmission specialists who, after a bit of head scratching, cured it with a new switch for £80 (MB answered my letter of complaint with 'glad the problem is resolved' - yeah, thanks). A minor fault with the roof that would have been a major problem if I hadn't stopped lowering the roof when I did. All the major components are original; all body panels, the engine, supercharger, gearbox and diff, even the exhaust(!) are original.
MB are okay but have become less interested as the car gets older.
Usually able to find pointers on the internet for problems.
Apart from the seats the interior is not good. It is painted plastic. Underneath the paint the plastic is black but even the black interiors are painted and show wear. There are numerous articles on the internet about how to restore the interior and there's a company on the Isle of Wight who estimate £600 to refurbish the whole interior.
Everything is pretty durable. The switchgear and whatnot are still all original.
Drain channels need clearing every so often. As do the voids behind the wings and the bits of sill you can get at.
It has never leaked - no drips anywhere. It doesn't use any oil; the service interval is 2 years or 10,000
miles and although I check it regularly I've never had to top it up between services.
There's no getting round it, the car is stiffly sprung. Road noise depends a lot on tyre choice.
The ride is okay though. Even though it isn't really, just tell folk it's a sports car. They'll understand.
The steering is okay. The car has phenomenal dry road grip but the worst slippery road behaviour of any car I've ever driven. I managed a full 180 degree spin at walking pace on black ice as the car and I disagreed about how to tackle the loss of grip and traction. As mentioned, we now have winter and summer tyres. The winter tyres improved things.
The 5-speed automatic was very smooth but now is just smooth. You can now feel the changes. It's fine.
The exhaust note isn't my favourite.
The seats are comfortable; we've taken it on two holidays in Europe, one to the South of France and one to northern Italy. You couldn't do that in a car with uncomfortable seats.
The traction control is fine other than the woeful slippery road behaviour mentioned above.
On the long fast runs in Europe the car returned 34mpg. On a relaxed 400 mile round trip recently to Manchester and back it returned 37mpg.

We love it; it's a keeper. As I clean it by hand fairly frequently I can see rust spots as they appear and dab paint on it to keep the tin worm at bay.

I have always liked the shape. To my eye the proportions are good and, compared to the later SLKs, the lines are fairly simple. Because of this I think it will age well.

Having said all this, the cars which haven't been cared for will suffer. I was surprised to read the list of maladies afflicting the shed most of which ours hasn't had. My guess is the early SLK is at the bottom of its value curve right now. Consequently a lot will be scrapped but in ten or fifteen years the few that remain will be sought after. It's the way the world turns.




Edited by DickyC on Friday 20th January 23:00

Steve Morse

22 posts

126 months

Friday 20th January 2017
quotequote all
I drove an SLK for 13 years and it gave me almost no problems as you would expect from a MB, and certainly none of the ones that you mention, aside from the electric roof packing up towards the very end.

It was always completely reliable across the 110k miles that I had it for so your article comes across as just sniffy.






iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
The SLK was based on W202 C Class running gear, and thgewy're as tough as old boots. The M111 4 cyl engine is almost indestructible.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,407 posts

151 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
moustachebandit said:
The R170 SLK is an utter turd of a car.

Its also the reason why I would rather eat handfuls of my own st then own another Mercedes.

Quite literally the sttest car I have ever had the misfortune to own or drive. 8 years ago the OH was set on owning one and I couldn't convince her otherwise. Cant even give it away now.

Stupidly rusty.
Unreliable.
Poorly built.
Expensive to repair (even when buying parts from a scrap yard because mercedes either dont stock it or what your soul in exchange)
Literally no aftermarket support.
Non existent knowledge base within the owners clubs.
Self destructing interior.
Cheap plastics ... everywhere.
Substandard fixings used everywhere (almost every job that requires removing bolts is touch and go as to whether they snap off or round with the lightest of force).
Mind bendingly moronic design of drain channels means means they block and then redirect rain into the cabin or boot
Leaks petrol
Dash is design for LHD cars but adapted for RHD - so the central console is facing away from you.
Creaks and rattles over anything other than polished glass. Huge amount of road noise too.
Terrible ride quality - rock hard suspension that crashes over everything, yet wallows and falls over as soon as you get to a corner.
The steering feedback is comparable to a xbox controller.
It has the most useless 4 speed auto, which cant ever seem to work out what gear you need so just gives you all of them, interspersed with neck snapping gear changes.
The exhaust note is terrible - it sounds like someone trying to play the didgeridoo.
Interior seats are as comfortable as a park bench.
Super sensitive traction control that is so savage in how it cuts power its actually dangerous. Cant be turned off.
Its also crap on fuel.

I dont think I can convey exactly how much I hate this car. Avoid at all costs!
So overall, what's your verdict?

Twoshoe

856 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
moustachebandit said:
The R170 SLK is an utter turd of a car.

Its also the reason why I would rather eat handfuls of my own st then own another Mercedes.

Quite literally the sttest car I have ever had the misfortune to own or drive. 8 years ago the OH was set on owning one and I couldn't convince her otherwise. Cant even give it away now.

Stupidly rusty.
Unreliable.
Poorly built.
Expensive to repair (even when buying parts from a scrap yard because mercedes either dont stock it or what your soul in exchange)
Literally no aftermarket support.
Non existent knowledge base within the owners clubs.
Self destructing interior.
Cheap plastics ... everywhere.
Substandard fixings used everywhere (almost every job that requires removing bolts is touch and go as to whether they snap off or round with the lightest of force).
Mind bendingly moronic design of drain channels means means they block and then redirect rain into the cabin or boot
Leaks petrol
Dash is design for LHD cars but adapted for RHD - so the central console is facing away from you.
Creaks and rattles over anything other than polished glass. Huge amount of road noise too.
Terrible ride quality - rock hard suspension that crashes over everything, yet wallows and falls over as soon as you get to a corner.
The steering feedback is comparable to a xbox controller.
It has the most useless 4 speed auto, which cant ever seem to work out what gear you need so just gives you all of them, interspersed with neck snapping gear changes.
The exhaust note is terrible - it sounds like someone trying to play the didgeridoo.
Interior seats are as comfortable as a park bench.
Super sensitive traction control that is so savage in how it cuts power its actually dangerous. Cant be turned off.
Its also crap on fuel.

I dont think I can convey exactly how much I hate this car. Avoid at all costs!
So overall, what's your verdict?
I'm going to make a wild stab at this - 'not keen'?

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
Steve Morse said:
it gave me almost no problems as you would expect from a MB
I can't believe people still say and believe this, it has been quite literally 20 years since Mercedes started producing crap with no end it sight. What I expect from an MB is endless niggles, creaky poor quality trim, and apparently now crabbing and creaking when you go round corners!! I also thought they'd stopped them rusting now, but not judging from the 4 year old people carrier van thing I saw the other day.


Edited by dme123 on Saturday 21st January 10:34

W124

1,545 posts

139 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
The thing with Mercs of this era is that they are a total lottery. You could buy two of these made on the same day, in the same factory, and one might be utterly reliable and not rust, the other might fall apart in front of your eyes. You just can't tell.

MarJay

2,173 posts

176 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
Spannerski said:
Always found these cars are for people who cut hair.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rolleyes
Indeed. This is disrespectful to both SLK owners, Hair styling professionals and PH at large to be honest.

swisstoni

17,040 posts

280 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
MarJay said:
Spannerski said:
Always found these cars are for people who cut hair.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rolleyes
Indeed. This is disrespectful to both SLK owners, Hair styling professionals and PH at large to be honest.
There may even be a human rights angle hehe

Jimmy Recard

17,540 posts

180 months

Saturday 21st January 2017
quotequote all
I've just done a bit of reading about the problems with it and none of them sound that bad, though I'm sure there's a reason the car is so cheap.

Tempting to get it and spend a few weekends over the next few months making it nice for summer