RE: Shed Of The Week: Renaultsport Clio 172

RE: Shed Of The Week: Renaultsport Clio 172

Author
Discussion

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
egor110 said:
The cam belt i already mentioned , the rest you'd pick up on a test drive ie does it change gear smoothly.

Re the exhausts nobody replaces them with oem there's a wide range of aftermarket replacements.

Some people seem to want a car for under a grand and it all to be 100% perfect , you can't have your cake and eat it.
Yes, but has it been done by a specialist? If not, it ideally needs doing again for around £600.

Yes, i know, i did actually say that specifically if you read my reply.

FYI, the 172/182 is my next car which is the reason why i said i'd personally get a slightly better example for a bit more cash. That's just my opinion though and i can understand that SOTW doesn't really work like that and not everyone's in it for the same reason that i am in regards to this car.

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
egor110 said:
Perhaps sub £1000 sheds are not going to be for you then.

You need to go in with your eyes open and treat it as a gamble some you win and some you loose, if you never want to loose stick with a full lease where all the maintenance, tyres etc is done for you.
As i've said, i'd spend a bit more on one. Tbh, it's my fault, i'm commenting on this as my next car as apposed to a shed point of view.

My apologies for any confusion.

Edited by culpz on Friday 27th January 12:35

daemon

35,841 posts

198 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Too expensive.

Needs £400-£600 for a timing belt / dephaser pulley & water pump. Probably another £100 on MOT bits and pieces.

It will be the wrong side of £1500 by the time its on the road and legal - probably more when you sort out other bits that will inevitably need doing.


LordHaveMurci

12,045 posts

170 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Gearboxes are NOT robust!

Great little cars though.

Richard-390a0

2,257 posts

92 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Gribs said:
Richard-390a0 said:
Shame the tax is so high other than that looks like it could be worth a punt.
£300 a year on tax is expensive? It's an insignificant cost overall in running a performance car, pay it monthly at £25 and it's not noticeable. If it is then you really shouldn't be looking at anything other than something very basic.
It's expensive when you consider it's just under a third of the cost to buy the car. For the average punter running a shed if you looked at that & thought 'oh a clio that will be buttons to run' you would be in for a surprise when you come to tax it is my point.
P.S I can comfortably afford to tax & run this car as a weekend plaything but I'd rather put £270 towards the cost of a cambelt / MOT repairs than spunk it on VED & hence I would probably look at other options.

GM182

1,271 posts

226 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Had a 182 from new (hence the username). Cup chassis, black with grey wheels. It was a great little car but when I started doing significant motorway miles it made way for a Golf MkV GTi.

More recently on a tighter budget I ran a 172 for a year. That one had 130,000 miles but crucially backed up with a full service history including two cambelt changes. It was also a great fun car. Acquitted itself well around Brands Indy circuit and reminded me about lairy lift-off oversteer biggrin . Clutch was on the way out when I sold it for £800 about two years ago but otherwise it had a pretty robust feel about it.

8potdave

2,310 posts

214 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Me thinks they aren't very computer literate! I had one of these a few years ago just to take me to work and back and unfortunately I bought a lemon. I spent a small fortune sorting the knackered brakes and then it decided to have an intermittent starting fault which no one could diagnose. When it worked though I loved it, an absolute hooligans car that begged to be thrashed within an inch of its life. It was certainly the wrong car for me as I couldn't resist being a dick in it!

Gribs

469 posts

137 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Richard-390a0 said:
It's expensive when you consider it's just under a third of the cost to buy the car. For the average punter running a shed if you looked at that & thought 'oh a clio that will be buttons to run' you would be in for a surprise when you come to tax it is my point.
P.S I can comfortably afford to tax & run this car as a weekend plaything but I'd rather put £270 towards the cost of a cambelt / MOT repairs than spunk it on VED & hence I would probably look at other options.
If you're spending shed money what can you get that offers similar performance and isn't at least £235 a year to tax? The only cars I think VED really effects are post 2006 boring stuff in the nearly £500 band

LordHaveMurci

12,045 posts

170 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
8potdave said:
an absolute hooligans car that begged to be thrashed within an inch of its life. It was certainly the wrong car for me as I couldn't resist being a dick in it!
I thought that getting into mine this morning, wondered if I'd slow down a bit in a more sensible, boring commuter?!

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
Gearboxes are NOT robust!

Great little cars though.
Word!

Jay Kay 225

19 posts

173 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
They had it up for sale at £1,800 previously. For £990 it looks decent enough and I would assume they would stick a ticket on it for the buyer. Nice shed

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
I thought that getting into mine this morning, wondered if I'd slow down a bit in a more sensible, boring commuter?!
Come on now LHM. that's crazy talk. Why would anyone want such a thing? biggrin

SDavyy

56 posts

103 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Jesus christ, you lot want a mint car for under £1k..

The gearboxes are fine? It's the later 197/200 which are a bit crunchy.

Cambelt, waterpump, dephaser, oil change is £500 at a specialist so not too bad, every 70k/5yrs.

I've had mine for 4 years now, absolutely great car, quick for what it is and great fun. £20 per month tax is hardly back breaking either. 35-40mpg too.

PoopahScoopah

249 posts

126 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Gribs said:
Richard-390a0 said:
It's expensive when you consider it's just under a third of the cost to buy the car. For the average punter running a shed if you looked at that & thought 'oh a clio that will be buttons to run' you would be in for a surprise when you come to tax it is my point.
P.S I can comfortably afford to tax & run this car as a weekend plaything but I'd rather put £270 towards the cost of a cambelt / MOT repairs than spunk it on VED & hence I would probably look at other options.
If you're spending shed money what7 can you get that offers similar performance and isn't at least £235 a year to tax? The only cars I think VED really effects are post 2006 boring stuff in the nearly £500 band
Exactly. Hit the nail on the head.

What's the actual cost of parts for a proper belt and bits change? And does it really need to be done by a "specialist"? £600 is what i paid for the full job on my Alfa V6 and that WAS done hy a specialist. Same price for Clio?! Appreciate you probably wouldn't want to trust a greasy back street place to do the job, but the Alfa specialist I mentioned looks exactly like that sort of place and they did the belt tensioners and pullets etc on my V70 T5 last year for a couple hundred quid, which again is supposed to be a "specialist" job because of the variable timing, yet they aren't a Volvo specialist and managed fine. Surely all you need is a trusted competent garage rather than a marque specific specialist.

commievid

9 posts

273 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
We have one, 2002.

The belts in parts alone are probably £450 at a squeeze. The "dephaser pulley" is always bandied with it. Not doing that is ~£90 less? The aux belt and tensioners are ~£70, quite dear to be honest.

The entire value of these cars is predicated on whether the belt is done.

I did it myself, and cost me more because I decided to also renew the air con and radiator and mounts, and even with those not there, it was an unbelievably annoying job, there's really little space. It's keyless, so there's lots of importance placed on getting it timed right and torqued up correctly.

Even now, it's leaking oil, so I've probably cocked up the cam seals, or the crank seal is leaking, won't know unless I literally take it all off again.

It hasn't died on us however, and other than the rattles, it is quite a cracking motor, with climate control and cruise control (if you take the bits from a 182).

I used to pay £400 VED when I first got my S2000. By the time I sold it, they wanted £475 or something like that. My Elise is £180, same as our 1.6 Mk1 Focus!

£270 is fine in comparison.


egor110

16,877 posts

204 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
culpz said:
egor110 said:
Perhaps sub £1000 sheds are not going to be for you then.

You need to go in with your eyes open and treat it as a gamble some you win and some you loose, if you never want to loose stick with a full lease where all the maintenance, tyres etc is done for you.
As i've said, i'd spend a bit more on one. Tbh, it's my fault, i'm commenting on this as my next car as apposed to a shed point of view.

My apologies for any confusion.

Edited by culpz on Friday 27th January 12:35
Do drive a proper 172 cup as well the normal 182 with cup pack if you get the chance , there very different cars.

LordHaveMurci

12,045 posts

170 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
SDavyy said:
The gearboxes are fine? It's the later 197/200 which are a bit crunchy.
Wrong, ask me how I know...

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

161 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Loved my 172! Fantastic hot hatch. A mature, refined 106 GTI!


SDavyy

56 posts

103 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
Wrong, ask me how I know...
I assume yours went bang. Mine is on 110k, (i've done 40k of those, and changed gearbox oil 3 times in that time), and perfect.

Clearly, they do go bang sometimes, but they aren't a huge issue.

shaun442k

262 posts

197 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
SDavyy said:
LordHaveMurci said:
Wrong, ask me how I know...
I assume yours went bang. Mine is on 110k, (i've done 40k of those, and changed gearbox oil 3 times in that time), and perfect.

Clearly, they do go bang sometimes, but they aren't a huge issue.
They're not great boxes. Mine is on it's third(at least). It crunches into 3rd if you rush it and my previous 182 crunched into 3rd and 4th if you didn't pause before selecting the gear.