RE: Lamborghini Huracan Performante - Geneva 2017

RE: Lamborghini Huracan Performante - Geneva 2017

Author
Discussion

PurpleAki

1,601 posts

88 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
no drag optimisation on straights etc.
Incorrect. Read the article again.

Also what do you think the Attiva in Aerodinamica Lamborghini Attiva, stands for?

Krikkit

26,536 posts

182 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
bolted on to an existing body, not designed around it hence no active wing, no air brake, no drag optimisation on straights etc.
I'd say it has an active rear wing, as well as an active front end, so pretty reasonable. As you say, not specifically done for it, so maybe not as effective, but writing it off is foolish.

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

226 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Christ! This is top of my 'aspiration' list. :drool:

Talksteer

4,884 posts

234 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Yipper said:
The "controversy" over the record laptime is just amateur YouTubers desperate for attention with tinfoil conspiracy theories and p*ssed-off Porsche, Ferrari and McLaren fanatics who have yet to come to terms with Lambo as the new king of the Ring.

Lambo, Pirelli, Racelogic (VBOX) have all said the Huracan lap is genuine. Racelogic has even shared professional data publicly to independently support the lap. The article really needs to mention those elements.

Lambo now has the best-handling and fastest supercar on the planet. Lambo's engineering team, five-plus years in the making, is now in a whole different league to the rest of the entire industry.

The game has changed.
As much as I hate the Alt Right "there is no truth" everybody is untrustworthy rhetoric Lamborghini have some bullst form more so than most manufacturers.

This is my estimate of probability of truth.

The lap was accurately timed, no trick editting stitching best segments together. (V-Box) 90%

The tyres are road legal (Pirelli) 95%

The tyres are the same as I will get on the road car and not having a stickier and shorter lived compound on the same carcass 50%

The car has a regular production engine and has not been blue printed/selected as a good one. It hasn't been chipped and run on higher quality/octane fuel. (Lamborghini) 25%

So about 11% chance even if you are Stefan Bellof you will be able to match that lap time with a randomly chosen production car.

I doubt it has been lightened or that it's running different suspension. Given it is a track special why not just use that suspension component on the production vehicle.

Still a very impressive achievement it's only 10 seconds slower than a GT3 car.



ZX10R NIN

27,635 posts

126 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
I look forward to Evo testing this.

isaldiri

18,604 posts

169 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
a6khu said:
750% ?! That's witchcraft.
not if the stock car generate sod all
SportAuto had the huracan producing 10kg of downforce (5 front and rear) at 200km/h in their wind tunnel test as part of the supertest.

MDL111

6,962 posts

178 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
IMI A said:
Nice car. Not the wildest styling for a Lambo. Funny how they now glide over acceleration times and focus on the track time. Those pesky blown Maccas and Fezzas. Feel they've missed a trick not offering RWD and a manual box for this car but nice car nonetheless.
Agreed - That would be a proper differentiator

Juno

4,481 posts

250 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Good news about the price which is much better than the estimated price when I ordered thumbup

gigglebug

2,611 posts

123 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
ZX10R NIN said:
I look forward to Evo testing this.
Your not looking forward to Pistonheads testing it then?

It's a good looking thing apart from maybe the wheels. Lots of overly fussy wheels nowadays.

gigglebug

2,611 posts

123 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Juno said:
Good news about the price which is much better than the estimated price when I ordered thumbup
Was there any indication of there being a choice of tyres being available when you ordered Juno or have you yet to finalise and specs?

Mike1990

964 posts

132 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
So much want!

Juno

4,481 posts

250 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
gigglebug said:
Juno said:
Good news about the price which is much better than the estimated price when I ordered thumbup
Was there any indication of there being a choice of tyres being available when you ordered Juno or have you yet to finalise and specs?
I will finalise specification at Geneva,they weren't aware of any specific options when I ordered last year!!!

However there is a much nicer center lock wheel option in a better style thumbup

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Why's there so many haters? If it was a maclaren or similar they'd be wetting their pants. Are these just maclaren owners?

gigglebug

2,611 posts

123 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Juno said:
I will finalise specification at Geneva,they weren't aware of any specific options when I ordered last year!!!

However there is a much nicer center lock wheel option in a better style thumbup
That's cool. It's not a completely rubbish wheel but the rest of the design is quite solid and clean in comparison to the wiryness of the wheels if that makes sense.

I would guess you'll have the choice of the Corsa or Trofeo tyres as well?

mwstewart

7,617 posts

189 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Incredible thing.

RamboLambo

4,843 posts

171 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
The flock carbon looks dreadful. Was it to save the weight of the lacquer or just cost ?

Juno

4,481 posts

250 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
My Spec

Interior

Juno

4,481 posts

250 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Side View

Juno

4,481 posts

250 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
3/4 Front

JiggyJaggy

1,451 posts

141 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Is there a configurator available to play around with?