RE: Ferrari planning Formula E entry

RE: Ferrari planning Formula E entry

Author
Discussion

Bahnstormer

934 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
With the Roborace series coming, we will be spoiled for choice ...........NOT !

NickGibbs

1,260 posts

232 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Anyone see the Mexico race on the weekend? It was a cracker. Hadn't see one for a while, but if that's a indicator of the level of drama you can expect then I can see more folk gravitating over from F1.
The fact they don't have all the fiddly aero I guess accounted for the close running of the cars, and the battery life issue is similar to tyre wear in F1 in that it adds an additional level of drama. (Tyres don't seem to be an issue in Formula E - they're grooved and maybe a harder compound, so lower grip and less wear?)

boxedin

1,354 posts

127 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Bahnstormer said:
With the Roborace series coming, we will be spoiled for choice ...........NOT !
Now you know why Bosch, Honda and Husqvarna ( BMW ) invest in Robot Lawnmowers... actually watching the lawnmowers is probably better, at least they're doing something useful.

Q Car

138 posts

191 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
I also watched the Mexico race last weekend and thought it was surprisingly good compared to the 60 or so parade laps that make up an F1 race these days. Now, if only they could make them sound like Tie Fighters....

smilo996

2,795 posts

171 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
It is the future whether the V10 scream mechanical baby F1 brigade like it or not.
So it makes sense for Ferrari ro be there then they can test cutting edge electric tech in isolation and feed it into F1 and their future cars. Good on Ferrari.

There is a heritage series for those who dont like the future.

hoegaardenruls

1,219 posts

133 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
The Mexico race was a good one, and plenty to maintain interest - a proper circuit played a part, but it always seems to be good, close racing.

I had been at the last London race, as the venue was pretty much on my doorstep, and it was a good day out, and not without the drama of a championship effectively being a race within a race with Buemi and di Grassi pushing for fastest lap after an early smash. Sadly the local nimbies got hold of the event, or I would have happily gone back this year.

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
the only decent electric race series on earth belongs to radio controlled cars.

It makes me sad that we're going this way.


Jex

840 posts

129 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Should this have been posted on Saturday?

Yipper

5,964 posts

91 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Formula E is absolutely rubbish. Like watching mobility scooters go round in circles. Not even Ferrari can make it interesting.

Bad news for Formula 1. Their flagship team is semi-threatening to jump ship.

AnotherClarkey

3,602 posts

190 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Yipper said:
Bad news for Formula 1. Their flagship team is semi-threatening to jump ship.
Not really, the people who own Formula 1 have the largest stakeholding in Formula E. I expect they are quite pleased with the way that Formula E is attracting manufacturers in a way the Formula 1 has failed to do.

Yipper

5,964 posts

91 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
Yipper said:
Bad news for Formula 1. Their flagship team is semi-threatening to jump ship.
Not really, the people who own Formula 1 have the largest stakeholding in Formula E. I expect they are quite pleased with the way that Formula E is attracting manufacturers in a way the Formula 1 has failed to do.
It is terrible news for F1. Formula E generates -98% less revenue and attracts nowhere near the crowds or viewers of Formula 1. Ferrari is simultaneously diminishing F1 and merely polishing the Formula E turd. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
279 said:
Is this not just Ferrari trying to strengthen its position (and protect its bonus payments) before the F1 concorde negotiations in 2020?

Short of the highly unlikely event of a number of teams forming an entirely new series, Formula E looks like the only likely alternative to F1, and seems to be attracting Manufacturers at a rate that Liberty can only dream of.
I thought I heard recently that Ferrari have bartered their bonus payment in favour of shares in the new organisation and cash?


KarlMac said:
If battery/electric tech hasn't advanced from where it is now then the formula will be dead on its feet. I disagree that purely electric racing is the future as I see electric vehicles as the future of commuting, not sports/super cars.

It's going to be interesting to watch either way smile
Elon Musk has stated that battery tech is advancing at a rate of around 30% per annum. I don't know if he means the pure theory side, or if he means what is offered commercially, but it would seem in a competitive environment, a team like Ferrari would make those two goalposts as close as they could.

AnotherClarkey

3,602 posts

190 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Yipper said:
It is terrible news for F1. Formula E generates -98% less revenue and attracts nowhere near the crowds or viewers of Formula 1. Ferrari is simultaneously diminishing F1 and merely polishing the Formula E turd. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.
I don't really give a monkey's chuff if it is terrible news for F1 or not. The Formula E 'turd' seems to be polishing up quite nicely and Liberty Media are hedging their bets by having a substantial stake in it.

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Elon Musk has stated that battery tech is advancing at a rate of around 30% per annum. I don't know if he means the pure theory side, or if he means what is offered commercially, but it would seem in a competitive environment, a team like Ferrari would make those two goalposts as close as they could.
does not matter if it moves on 3000% per day. Its still just an electric car. dull, lacking noise/drama/connection.

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
jason61c said:
big_rob_sydney said:
Elon Musk has stated that battery tech is advancing at a rate of around 30% per annum. I don't know if he means the pure theory side, or if he means what is offered commercially, but it would seem in a competitive environment, a team like Ferrari would make those two goalposts as close as they could.
does not matter if it moves on 3000% per day. Its still just an electric car. dull, lacking noise/drama/connection.
3000% per day, eh? Good thing you're not prone to making OTT statements. People might not take you seriously...

But here's the real "pearler". The ICE cartel have had around a hundred years of concentrated development. Along comes Tesla, and they commercialise a car that can cut 10 second quarter miles off the showroom floor, for about £100k.

Now, you say EV's are dull, lacking noise / drama / connection? Hmm, that's a charge you could level at a lot of Audi's these days, isn't it? Not to mention many other brands.

I'm not so interested to examine your own car history, but I venture that you must have a daily driver with a warranty that can exceed a 10 second quarter mile then? Please, do tell.

Quickmoose

4,495 posts

124 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
What cars we drive has naff all to do with having an opinion on something. I wish that kind of posturing would end.

The point that ICE has been under development for over a century, and as a result of it, we have THIS kind of F1 'racing' as the pinnacle? is a good one though
And its another good point that 99% (guess) of motoring is done with characterless, drama-less, passion-less boxes.

EVs have been developed for far less time, with far FAR less investment and already they have the economy, the comfort and to a large degree the performance (if not the range)...says a lot I think....easily enough to do the white-goods work.
The drama/noise is an issue, but only for a generation that'll be dead soon... and even then the torque/acceleration will provide some, and the noise I'm sure will develop....I hope so anyway.

It does make you wonder what could be achieved for EVs if they have 100 years of massive international funding/development...

hairyben

8,516 posts

184 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
What cars we drive has naff all to do with having an opinion on something. I wish that kind of posturing would end.

The point that ICE has been under development for over a century, and as a result of it, we have THIS kind of F1 'racing' as the pinnacle? is a good one though
And its another good point that 99% (guess) of motoring is done with characterless, drama-less, passion-less boxes.

EVs have been developed for far less time, with far FAR less investment and already they have the economy, the comfort and to a large degree the performance (if not the range)...says a lot I think....easily enough to do the white-goods work.
The drama/noise is an issue, but only for a generation that'll be dead soon... and even then the torque/acceleration will provide some, and the noise I'm sure will develop....I hope so anyway.

It does make you wonder what could be achieved for EVs if they have 100 years of massive international funding/development...
eek You know something the rest of us don't?

Electric wirry things will not replace engines solely "because technical advancement", in the same way sportspeople are still paid to run, kick, chuck and hit things even though technology has found more efficient ways of replicating all of those acts as individual tasks.

F1 survives as it's somewhat unique insofar as the drama, politics and soap operaness of it all has become a part of the occasion but outside of that most people want something mostly red blooded, and the noise is a big chunk of the fun.

AnotherClarkey

3,602 posts

190 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
I wonder if much of the attraction of engine noise is because it is associated with high performance? Once electric cars significantly out-perform IC (which we are seeing the first signs of now) engine noise will just be the 'sound of slow' and may become an embarrassment.

Plug Life

978 posts

92 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
engine noise will just be the 'sound of slow' and may become an embarrassment.
It has already become among non-Neanderthals.

Edited by Plug Life on Tuesday 4th April 11:34

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
engine noise will just be the 'sound of slow' and may become an embarrassment.
Wot, like Harley Davidsons?