RE: Shed Of The Week: Volvo S80

RE: Shed Of The Week: Volvo S80

Author
Discussion

shost

825 posts

144 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
My dad's has one. Bought ex demo in 2003. It's covered just under 200,000 miles.

170bhp petrol 5 cyl auto sounds lovely. Steering and suspension are well past it. I remember it being quite sporting when new.

It's now in a race to see who'll out last who as the old boy is 82..

MDMA .

8,901 posts

102 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
grumpy52 said:
One of the cars that if you stick a cheapo non ageing plate on, especially if it's dark colour car ,nobody would know it's not a recent model .
Mayor of Wigan still has the 2004 Volvo S80 D5 ( AEK 1 ).

vixen1700

22,981 posts

271 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
nct001 said:
vixen1700 said:
Bought a £1k S40 in October that's done 14000 faultless comfortable miles since with a healthy 51.4 diesel mpg average.

Think I'll always have a reliable old Volvo of some description. smile
A reliable old Volvo!

You do realise it has a Renault dci 1.9 engine - open the bonnet French stuff everywhere - this model is not really a Volvo.

And the s40 was a Jv with Mitsubishi so I suppose the seats are Swedish.
Had no idea. hehe

Still with 126k on the clock and without a single rattle or squeak, it feels like a Volvo to me.

MadmanO/T People

899 posts

206 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
CliveM said:
£850
For something that comfortable and capable on long journeys - bloody great at what it's there to do.
Yes it's not a sports car but it's a SHED, that's not always the point.
Can you imagine how depressing it must be to be reading PH from another country where this cornucopia of shedness is three or four times the cost to buy/run?
Hello, PH's token Yank, here. Yes, it is depressing.

Just to show you exactly how depressing, I decided to search for a 2002-03 Volvo S80 and here's what I found.


http://listingallcars.com/details/2002-Volvo-S80-U...


This is the nearest one to me here at the beautiful and palatial Casa del Madman. It's a 2002 S80 2.9 automatic, white with cream leather, sunroof, and the highly desireable 17 inch Arrakis wheels. 161,000 miles on the clock and it appears to be in very good condition. How much, you ask? That'll be $4,499 or, at current exchange rates, about £3,484. That's roughly FOUR TIMES the asking price of the SOTW Volvo S80.

I can only dream of living on an island where nearly new Audis and the like all go for a fiver each! Anyone want to sponsor me through the immigration process?

PomBstard

6,783 posts

243 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Never understand the love for big old Volvos on PH. They're reasonably comfortable in a straight line and that's about it, and so many other cars can do that too. Even the seats aren't that good. Many other cars more capable and interesting, IME.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
PomBstard said:
Never understand the love for big old Volvos on PH. They're reasonably comfortable in a straight line and that's about it, and so many other cars can do that too. Even the seats aren't that good. Many other cars more capable and interesting, IME.
I have to disagree with this - the seats in our 06 S60 are superb , like big leather armchairs with heaters in, they are stupidly comfy.

As for the car....engine exploded last year , last week the ABS lights all came on and the huge list of fault codes say that almost every electrical item relating to the ABS is now broken (codes cleared and its happy again at the moment, phew) , electric windows have freak-outs sometimes and won't close , had to replace a headlight bulb which felt like it required removal of the entire bodyshell , and somehow I managed to break the headlight squirters so now the car wets itself every time the washers are used.... not sold on Swedish cars (and working on them) or their reliability so far.

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 1st May 10:11

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
JimSuperSix said:
I have to disagree with this - the seats in our 06 S60 are superb , like big leather armchairs with heaters in, they are stupidly comfy.

As for the car....engine exploded last year , last week the ABS lights all came on and the huge list of fault codes say that almost every electrical item relating to the ABS is now broken (codes cleared and its happy again at the moment, phew) , electric windows have freak-outs sometimes and won't close , had to replace a headlight bulb which felt like it required removal of the entire bodyshell , and somehow I managed to break the headlight squirters so now the car wets itself every time the washers are used.... not sold on Swedish cars (and working on them) or their reliability so far.

Edited by JimSuperSix on Monday 1st May 10:11
Funnily enough the middle aged P2 platform cars are the best ones to have. After the early issues were sorted but before the big facelift where I personally think a lot of cost was taken out of them and Fords "who gives a st about long term ownership" engineering influence began to creep in. The headlamp bulbs was an easy job on the early cars, for example. Basically the further into the Ford era your car was made the more likely it is to have small irritating problems. They never really gave the S80 a big update so they might not suffer from this.

My '08 C70 is a good example, with a Volvo engine and gearbox but plenty of Ford bits in it's Ford Focus platform. Every single time a component fails or wears out a bit sooner than I'd expect, and I do mean every single time, I take it out and it has the FoMoCo stamp on it. It's certainly needed more work to get to 120k than my 2004 V70 needed to get to 150k, and has been treated much more kindly too. The 2004 car was a pleasure to work on, logically assembled using very high quality fixings that all came apart and went back together again smoothly. After years of Jaguar tat it was a revelation.

I am hoping that the new post Ford designed cars will show a return to form in terms of robustness and quality of engineering.

ExPat2B

2,157 posts

201 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
PomBstard said:
Never understand the love for big old Volvos on PH. They're reasonably comfortable in a straight line and that's about it, and so many other cars can do that too. Even the seats aren't that good. Many other cars more capable and interesting, IME.
Honestly, you have to drive a few cars in their class in order to understand the Volvo.

They just feel "right" to drive.

The design team clearly decided, that this is not going to be a car that is driven at the limits of traction and grip, let us instead concentrate on making it feel good at 7/10s and less.

The steering has just the right amount of feedback and weight, its a very easy car to drive smoothly and quickly.

The suspension is properly compliant without lots of body roll.

The driving position, seats, controls and ergonomics are near perfect.

Its got a great stereo .

The d5 engine is torquey, smooth, and is geared so you are in your powerband at UK motorway speeds. Its economical, and unlike many other "economical" engines, it remains economical even when driven at fast UK motorway speeds, which means 85mph dropping down to 65mph and back up again frequently. It is not perfectly reliable, but the common problems are well known and usually under £ 500 to fix at a specialist, and it will do big mileages with ease.

For covering lots of miles of UK motorways and DC's its just perfect, and encourages a relaxed, smooth driving style that is perfectly suited for the realities of daily progress.

You really need to try driving a few other cars in its class and then get back into the Volvo and you will be pleasantly suprised every time at just how good it is at the fundamental basics of driving.

JamesRR

279 posts

86 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
ExPat2B said:
Honestly, you have to drive a few cars in their class in order to understand the Volvo.

They just feel "right" to drive.

The design team clearly decided, that this is not going to be a car that is driven at the limits of traction and grip, let us instead concentrate on making it feel good at 7/10s and less.

The steering has just the right amount of feedback and weight, its a very easy car to drive smoothly and quickly.

The suspension is properly compliant without lots of body roll.

The driving position, seats, controls and ergonomics are near perfect.

Its got a great stereo .

The d5 engine is torquey, smooth, and is geared so you are in your powerband at UK motorway speeds. Its economical, and unlike many other "economical" engines, it remains economical even when driven at fast UK motorway speeds, which means 85mph dropping down to 65mph and back up again frequently. It is not perfectly reliable, but the common problems are well known and usually under £ 500 to fix at a specialist, and it will do big mileages with ease.

For covering lots of miles of UK motorways and DC's its just perfect, and encourages a relaxed, smooth driving style that is perfectly suited for the realities of daily progress.

You really need to try driving a few other cars in its class and then get back into the Volvo and you will be pleasantly suprised every time at just how good it is at the fundamental basics of driving.
This sums the whole 'Volvo thing' up perfectly. I think it applies to them all as well, not just the S80. Maybe I'm biased because it's my own car, but I drive a C30 every day and I don't actually think I would get a more 'nice place to be' car without going into the barge category.

DippedHeadlights

419 posts

205 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Yes 2004-2005 was the sweet spot. Quality went down significantly later. The petrol 2.5T is lovely but rare because of the all the politically inspired "diesel love" that happened 10 years ago and although the petrol was listed up to the end of 2007 they just crept in to the £500 tax bracket post March 2006 so (apart from Motability!) there were just about none sold.

Geartronic is great when working but post 100K miles a punt - and the problems can be hidden for 20 miles from cold so you wont see on a test drive - changing the "sealed for life" fluid at around 80K miles is straightforward and helps.

Not as good a family car as family grows. Great at child seat age but rear legroom less than you'd think and much moaning when they get to teenage years.

njw1

2,072 posts

112 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Can only agree with the above comments, you either get Volvos or you don't.

PomBstard

6,783 posts

243 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
I tried to like a big Volvo, I really did...

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

But ended up completely bored.

chammyman

123 posts

113 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Funny how many claim the 04 or 05 are the 'sweet' spot. I have a few of these and work on and MOT a lot of others and the early ones are the ones to go for if you don't want it welding every mot.

The early 2001's or so have the best bodies the later ones have failing strut tops etc.

My current volvo bangers are, s60 2.0t, s60 d5 2004 (worst of the lot) and a 2001 s80 t6

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
chammyman said:
My current volvo bangers are, s60 2.0t, s60 d5 2004 (worst of the lot) and a 2001 s80 t6
I'd like a T6, but have heard the gearbox is awful and only a 4 speed?

MadmanO/T People

899 posts

206 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
chammyman said:
My current volvo bangers are, s60 2.0t, s60 d5 2004 (worst of the lot) and a 2001 s80 t6
I'd like a T6, but have heard the gearbox is awful and only a 4 speed?
Yep, early six cylinder cars had a GM-sourced four speed auto, a veritable chocolate teapot in terms of durability. Milk has a longer shelf life!

MorganP104

2,605 posts

131 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
2001-2004 V70s/S80s with the 2.4 5-pot are the cars to go for.

Straying too far from this well-trodden path, specification-wise, will invariably lead to heartache and pain.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
MadmanO/T People said:
TheAngryDog said:
chammyman said:
My current volvo bangers are, s60 2.0t, s60 d5 2004 (worst of the lot) and a 2001 s80 t6
I'd like a T6, but have heard the gearbox is awful and only a 4 speed?
Yep, early six cylinder cars had a GM-sourced four speed auto, a veritable chocolate teapot in terms of durability. Milk has a longer shelf life!
Did they ever use a different box towards the end of the Mk1's life?

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
Smashing, yes

davidson476

2 posts

149 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
I have a s60d5 poverty spec but the engine is a peach ,mine has 175,000 miles and can still crack on,motorways are where its happiest,seems to get 44mpg however I drive it,i recently did a ten hour drive with the only stop being for fuel ,Essex to wales, wales to Lincolnshire,lincolnshire to Essex,the pick up when you press your foot down is good if you need to overtake at motorway speeds,just be wary if your looking at one with a slight oil leak that cant be traced as it can be very expensive,if I had the spare money I would love to see what chipping it would do but my head says other things need sorting first lol

Stedman

7,225 posts

193 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
Bloody comfortable seats