Police/Car Insurance Certificate

Police/Car Insurance Certificate

Author
Discussion

entropy

Original Poster:

5,450 posts

204 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
Do police still check these things these days?

Would a pdf on a smartphone suffice?

KungFuPanda

4,334 posts

171 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
Why don't you print off a copy of the PDF and keep it in your glovebox to be sure?

captainaverage

596 posts

88 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
entropy said:
Do police still check these things these days?

Would a pdf on a smartphone suffice?
Usually insurance status is on MID so that's how the police can check if a car is insured to drive however if your insurance started at a time out of work hours i.e. 00:00 on Sunday night then the car might not appear as insured on the MID in which case having a certificate to show will help if stopped by police.

KungFuPanda said:
Why don't you print off a copy of the PDF and keep it in your glovebox to be sure?
Treehuggers will argue it saves trees.

catso

14,793 posts

268 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
KungFuPanda said:
Why don't you print off a copy of the PDF and keep it in your glovebox to be sure?
Surely the best way.

O/T but similarly with any phone based important document such as boarding cards, what if your phone breaks/battery runs out just at the crucial time. For the sake of printing a sheet of paper, I would always do so (if possible) as a tech-failure backup.

entropy

Original Poster:

5,450 posts

204 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
catso said:
KungFuPanda said:
Why don't you print off a copy of the PDF and keep it in your glovebox to be sure?
Surely the best way.

O/T but similarly with any phone based important document such as boarding cards, what if your phone breaks/battery runs out just at the crucial time. For the sake of printing a sheet of paper, I would always do so (if possible) as a tech-failure backup.
What if your don't have printer or it breaks down at the wrong moment?

I carry two smartphones on me - the old one is used as back up/don't mind losing for boarding passes, e-tickets, etc.

Cat

3,023 posts

270 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
Producing an electronic version of a certificate is sufficient to comply with the relevant law.

Cat

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
entropy said:
What if your don't have printer or it breaks down at the wrong moment?
...and you don't have any friends with a printer, or who work somewhere with a printer, or a public library near you, or...

Gavia

7,627 posts

92 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
...and you don't have any friends with a printer, or who work somewhere with a printer, or a public library near you, or...
I don't have any friends, let alone ones with a printer, I'm retired and the council shut the local library wink

catso

14,793 posts

268 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
Gavia said:
I don't have any friends, let alone ones with a printer, I'm retired and the council shut the local library wink
Billy no-mates, you'll have us all in tears. weeping

idea PM me the certificate, I'll print a copy, scan it and email it back to you... laugh

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Sunday 30th April 2017
quotequote all
Don't you have 7 days to produce these documents or have the rules changed? I don't carry anything with me and I'm not panicking.

carreauchompeur

17,852 posts

205 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
Don't you have 7 days to produce these documents or have the rules changed? I don't carry anything with me and I'm not panicking.
Technically you do, however if there's a database feckup then you stand the risk of the car being seized if there's sufficient grounds to believe it's uninsured.

KungFuPanda

4,334 posts

171 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Following on from the above point, what if you had just insured your car on Monday, got a tug from the Police on Wednesday. The MID database hadn't been updated but you could show them your pdf certificate or a print off. The police still say you're uninsured as you could have cancelled said policy and kept the certificate / pdf. They then tow your car away and you have to subsequently have to pay say £450 for towing and release fees.

Once it was proved that you were insured, could you claim those fees back from the Police for wrongly taking your vehicle away? Or could the insurers be to blame for not updating the MID database quickly enough? Surely they would be allowed a reasonable period of time to update?

Kyodo

730 posts

125 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
I must admit, I keep a PDF copy on my phone as the police know everything they need from their databases. The copy I keep is more for the important telephone numbers it contains than anything else. If travelling abroad, then paper documents come with me.

dacouch

1,172 posts

130 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
KungFuPanda said:
Following on from the above point, what if you had just insured your car on Monday, got a tug from the Police on Wednesday. The MID database hadn't been updated but you could show them your pdf certificate or a print off. The police still say you're uninsured as you could have cancelled said policy and kept the certificate / pdf. They then tow your car away and you have to subsequently have to pay say £450 for towing and release fees.

Once it was proved that you were insured, could you claim those fees back from the Police for wrongly taking your vehicle away? Or could the insurers be to blame for not updating the MID database quickly enough? Surely they would be allowed a reasonable period of time to update?
If you had produced to the police officer at the scene a paper copy or a downloaded version of your "relevant" Certificate of Insurance then the seizure of the vehicle would not have been lawful and you would be entitled to a refund of the charges.

This is why it is very important to carry either your Certificate in a physical form or a digital copy

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Boosted LS1 said:
Don't you have 7 days to produce these documents or have the rules changed? I don't carry anything with me and I'm not panicking.
Technically you do, however if there's a database feckup then you stand the risk of the car being seized if there's sufficient grounds to believe it's uninsured.
What grounds would there be to believe it's uninsured though? I don't like the way we seem to be being led into a society where 'we' have to carry documents on us and i/d when there's no legal requirement. It's stealth by the back door imo.

carreauchompeur

17,852 posts

205 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
Not being on MID is a good start for reasonable suspicion, inability to answer questions about insurance/ownership of car another starter point...

TwigtheWonderkid

43,421 posts

151 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
KungFuPanda said:
Following on from the above point, what if you had just insured your car on Monday, got a tug from the Police on Wednesday. The MID database hadn't been updated but you could show them your pdf certificate or a print off. The police still say you're uninsured as you could have cancelled said policy and kept the certificate / pdf. They then tow your car away and you have to subsequently have to pay say £450 for towing and release fees.
The police should not be impounding your car based solely on its absence from the MID if you can produce a certificate. The MID is a database, a guide if you like, and not the be all and end all. Producing a valid certificate trumps the vehicle not being on the MID. If the police are suspicious that the certificate produced isn't valid, they have to carry out further enquiries by contacting the insurer concerned.

dacouch

1,172 posts

130 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
The police should not be impounding your car based solely on its absence from the MID if you can produce a certificate. The MID is a database, a guide if you like, and not the be all and end all. Producing a valid certificate trumps the vehicle not being on the MID. If the police are suspicious that the certificate produced isn't valid, they have to carry out further enquiries by contacting the insurer concerned.
and it is worth adding to this that if the Insurers incorrectly advise the Police that the vehicle is not insured after you have produced a valid (Relevent) Certificate, that if they subsequently impound the vehicle that the seizure is unlawful and the police would be liable to refund any costs in releasing the vehicle and any consequential losses

Boosted LS1

21,188 posts

261 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Not being on MID is a good start for reasonable suspicion, inability to answer questions about insurance/ownership of car another starter point...
I think if you can answer questions about the car then the MID aspect should be irrelevant. A reasonable copper should give you a producer. If under those circumstances they seized my car I'd be livid as the onus isn't on me to carry documentation. It's on them to conduct proper enquiries. I can see your point though.

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 1st May 2017
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
The police should not be impounding your car based solely on its absence from the MID if you can produce a certificate. The MID is a database, a guide if you like, and not the be all and end all. Producing a valid certificate trumps the vehicle not being on the MID. If the police are suspicious that the certificate produced isn't valid, they have to carry out further enquiries by contacting the insurer concerned.
.... and if the insurer isn't contactable at half-past midnight - then what?