Police pull over 'two abrest' cyclists - argument ensues
Discussion
mygoldfishbowl said:
Mave on the other hand doesn't have to obey the law and is quite within his rights to cycle on the path so not to increase his journey time by a few minutes..
If you weren't a vandal and hadn't smashed that wing mirror off you could have used it to see who the real hypocrites are.
In my example I break the law specifically to improve safety for me and convenience for motorists (Whereas I suspect that when most motorists break the law it is primarily for selfish reasons rather than safety or other road user's convenience).If you weren't a vandal and hadn't smashed that wing mirror off you could have used it to see who the real hypocrites are.
And unlike the examples of people parking on the pavement, on the rare occasions I encounter a pedestrian I just stop and move my bike to one side so the pedestrian isn't inconvenienced.
So what's the problem?
yellowjack said:
WinstonWolf said:
Mr2Mike said:
johnwilliams77 said:
Why so angry?
It's a cyclist thing....ironically that's a driver kicking off. Or is it "just an angry person who happens to be driving a car at the time" kicking off? Hmmmmm?
yellowjack said:
mygoldfishbowl said:
So those motorists should have parked further away in a legal car park to avoid breaking the law and walked back increasing their journey times buy a few minutes. Mave on the other hand doesn't have to obey the law and is quite within his rights to cycle on the path so not to increase his journey time by a few minutes..
If you weren't a vandal and hadn't smashed that wing mirror off you could have used it to see who the real hypocrites are.
Again. No vandalism took place. I made up a silly rhyme. No fktards had their cars damaged. Leastways not by me, anyway.If you weren't a vandal and hadn't smashed that wing mirror off you could have used it to see who the real hypocrites are.
And I STRONGLY disagree with you on who the REAL hypocrites are.
That honour goes to drivers who foam and froth about cyclists, telling said cyclists to "get off the roads - you don't even pay for them" then telling those cyclists that riding on "shared use paths" is "dangerous". That's true hypocrisy right there. Wanting it to work in your favour both ways.
Now run along and let us all know if it's possible to eat your cake but then still have it...
Truly couldn't make this bks up...
Stickyfinger said:
nickfrog said:
Mr2Mike said:
johnwilliams77 said:
Why so angry?
It's a cyclist thing.FK OFF...I AM HUMAN AND I AM NEVER FKING ANGRY !
FTFY; HTH...
yellowjack said:
If'n you're gonna try to swear in capital letters, you've gotta get it right...
FTFY; HTH...
STOP fkING EDITING MY POSTS please SirFTFY; HTH...
yellowjack said:
Clam UP...
...or...
...CALM down, dude.
u iz mixin ur metaphors or sumfink, innit Bruv!
The top part of a clam shell comes down to shut.....what with the "up" ?....it is wrong, never did get that ...or...
...CALM down, dude.
u iz mixin ur metaphors or sumfink, innit Bruv!
Edited by Stickyfinger on Tuesday 29th August 21:58
Stickyfinger said:
The top part of a clam shell comes down to shut.....what with the "up" ?....it is wrong, never did get that
I fully accept your entirely logical stance on the issue, but I'm afraid I'm not responsible for the common usage of "Clam up".Edited by Stickyfinger on Tuesday 29th August 21:58
Google search said:
Showing results for calm down meaning
Search instead for clam down meaning?
This thread may help... https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...Search instead for clam down meaning?
Doh this turned up while following a link from another thread
Surrey police asking for info on law when cyclists cant go 2 or more abreast
http://road.cc/content/news/231462-surrey-police-s...
Should we put them in contact with Essex?
Surrey police asking for info on law when cyclists cant go 2 or more abreast
http://road.cc/content/news/231462-surrey-police-s...
Should we put them in contact with Essex?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff