Van driver narrowly avoids cyclist
Discussion
saaby93 said:
frisbee said:
cb1965 said:
Oh here's another t
t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
Did your parents make you ride your sister's hand me down bike when you were growing up or something?t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
can you two try keep to the topic rather than taking pop at other posters
Integroo said:
Is this still going?
yes Ares kicked off this latest spat with a questionable second sentence ( at least) 
Integroo said:
Think both sides of this argument might just need to accept that the other isn't going to change their mind.
Lucky there's a middle ground between the two sides 
cb1965 said:
Ares said:
I'll invite you to read what I wrote again and highlight where I said someone did try to kill anyone.
Er....Ares said:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Ares said:
Intelligence is a powerful tool.
The irony!Where does that say someone in the video tried to kill anyone??
If you need help, just ask. Or ask a year 3 primary school teacher.
saaby93 said:
Integroo said:
Is this still going?
yes Ares kicked off this latest spat with a questionable second sentence ( at least) Integroo said:
Think both sides of this argument might just need to accept that the other isn't going to change their mind.
Lucky there's a middle ground between the two sides You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
Ares said:
Second sentence?
You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
No theyre two angles from the same side You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
Try again with the second of those two and you might manage it
Ares said:
cb1965 said:
Ares said:
I'll invite you to read what I wrote again and highlight where I said someone did try to kill anyone.
Er....Ares said:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Ares said:
Intelligence is a powerful tool.
The irony!Where does that say someone in the video tried to kill anyone??
If you need help, just ask. Or ask a year 3 primary school teacher.
cb1965 said:
In your opinion that's bizarre, back on the surface of the planet it's not!
Assuming that 1965 is your date of birth not your brain cell count i guess we can just put your bizarre claims that cyclists look at other vehicles wishing that the drivers paid their wages down to the early onset of senility.....Back on planet earth.....
OpulentBob said:
Pedantic, and disingenuous. You know what you were implying.
I wasn't implying anything. I stated it.When I cycle, I take issue that some drivers actions put my life in danger.
I'm also perfectly aware that some non-riders (i.e., non cycling drivers) just see cyclists as the scourge of the roads.
saaby93 said:
Ares said:
Second sentence?
You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
No theyre two angles from the same side You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
Try again with the second of those two and you might manage it
One is cyclist perceptions of drivers.
The other non-cycling drivers perceptions of cyclists.
Second sentence.... Non-riding drivers think those riders are the scourge of the roads...etc.
I then followed it with those who are neither don't give a s
t.Ares said:
I wasn't implying anything. I stated it.
When I cycle, I take issue that some drivers actions put my life in danger.
I'm also perfectly aware that some non-riders (i.e., non cycling drivers) just see cyclists as the scourge of the roads.
Better When I cycle, I take issue that some drivers actions put my life in danger.
I'm also perfectly aware that some non-riders (i.e., non cycling drivers) just see cyclists as the scourge of the roads.
add another some and youre there
frisbee said:
cb1965 said:
Oh here's another tt turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
Did your parents make you ride your sister's hand me down bike when you were growing up or something?t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
I think you've nailed it!
Some
tried to run me off the road the other day, he then went on to do it to everyone else in their cars.It's not the mode of transport, it's the t
t using it.WinstonWolf said:
frisbee said:
cb1965 said:
Oh here's another tt turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
Did your parents make you ride your sister's hand me down bike when you were growing up or something?t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!I think you've nailed it!
Some
tried to run me off the road the other day, he then went on to do it to everyone else in their cars.It's not the mode of transport, it's the t
t using it.t element within the bike population is a higher proportion than that in the motorised population in my neck of the woods.mybrainhurts said:
WinstonWolf said:
frisbee said:
cb1965 said:
Oh here's another tt turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
Did your parents make you ride your sister's hand me down bike when you were growing up or something?t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!I think you've nailed it!
Some
tried to run me off the road the other day, he then went on to do it to everyone else in their cars.It's not the mode of transport, it's the t
t using it.t element within the bike population is a higher proportion than that in the motorised population in my neck of the woods.
WinstonWolf said:
mybrainhurts said:
WinstonWolf said:
frisbee said:
cb1965 said:
Oh here's another tt turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!
Did your parents make you ride your sister's hand me down bike when you were growing up or something?t turning up the melodrama. No one tried to kill anyone you cretin!I think you've nailed it!
Some
tried to run me off the road the other day, he then went on to do it to everyone else in their cars.It's not the mode of transport, it's the t
t using it.t element within the bike population is a higher proportion than that in the motorised population in my neck of the woods.They do seem to fall off their bikes a bit, though....
Ares said:
Second sentence?
You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
You really are a thicko! FFS, how can you actually think that is two sides of the argument! You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
cb1965 said:
Ares said:
Second sentence?
You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
You really are a thicko! FFS, how can you actually think that is two sides of the argument! You don't think this is a the root cause:
Those who ride take issue with some drivers seemingly trying to kill them.
Those who don't ride think those that do are a scourge of the roads and are always in the wrong/should be banned.
Thats summarises the two sides of the argument.
One is cyclists perceptions of drivers.
The other is drivers perceptions of cyclist.
2 sides.
Got it yet?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff