RE: Range Rover Velar: Review
Discussion
Cold said:
PunterCam said:
I don't get this thing. I assumed they were going to make a Discovery Sport sized car - 4.6m in length for those who find the Evoque a bit small, but instead they've made a facelifted Range Rover Sport.
They already sell a Discovery Sport sized car.PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!Granfondo said:
PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!Granfondo said:
RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!Ken Figenus said:
OMG is that a 4 pot? If so on yer bikes! Especially compared to Macan residuals...
Range Rover Sport and Evoque both have better residuals than a Macan.https://www.whatcar.com/news/slowest-depreciating-...
RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!Granfondo said:
RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
RammyMP said:
Granfondo said:
PunterCam said:
If you've been in a Discovery Sport you'd know it doesn't isolate you from the road half as well as an Evoque or any "range rover". The Discovery Sport rides poorly, is noisy and doesn't have any of the luxury feel of the Evoque. I think most assumed a 4.3m long Evoque, a 4.6m long Velar and a 4.8m long Sport would make sense, but apparently not.
The DS does not ride "poorly" and is not "noisy" but obviously the air suspension cars are going to ride better than steel sprung ones!Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
Greg_D said:
what are you roffling at? I own a ffrr and have driven a disco sport. It's like a minicab in comparison. Proper low rent and 'ordinary'
Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
Couldn't agree more, especially as the Freelander is conspicuous by its absence in the current line up...........Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
No wait it's new name is Discovery 'Sport'
Pintofbest said:
Range Rover Sport and Evoque both have better residuals than a Macan.
https://www.whatcar.com/news/slowest-depreciating-...
OMG a Dacia Duster 1.6 SCe Ambiance beats all SUV's! Thanks for linking to that - eye opening!https://www.whatcar.com/news/slowest-depreciating-...
Greg_D said:
what are you roffling at? I own a ffrr and have driven a disco sport. It's like a minicab in comparison. Proper low rent and 'ordinary'
Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
It's you that's comparing them!Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
I was correcting the opinion that the DS is noisy and rides poorly which is just wrong!
Granfondo said:
Greg_D said:
what are you roffling at? I own a ffrr and have driven a disco sport. It's like a minicab in comparison. Proper low rent and 'ordinary'
Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
It's you that's comparing them!Obviously to be expected considering the price differential, but they are not even vaguely comparable...
I was correcting the opinion that the DS is noisy and rides poorly which is just wrong!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff