RE: New TVR - the update

RE: New TVR - the update

Author
Discussion

TA14

12,722 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
blade7 said:
He could just as easily have put the name on a vacuum cleaner...
or a boat:
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
or a wind turbine:
https://www.carkeys.co.uk/news/the-turbulent-histo...

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
Or set up a completely new car company without spending the money on the 'TVR' brand name, and without buying the negative 'unreliability' perception that goes with the marque!

As TA14 says, for better or worse this isn't the old TVR, it's a new TVR.
Will they be built in India or China....

DonkeyApple

55,419 posts

170 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
blade7 said:
Will they be built in India or China....
Maybe in time but they are building the first ones in a less developed country. wink

LordGrover

33,549 posts

213 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
Not Wales again?

mikebrownhill

122 posts

199 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
mikebrownhill said:
DonkeyApple said:
True but hopefully you don't have to be over 75 to own one or be married to a lady that resembles a deflated party balloon? biggrin
Ah, yes that old stereotype; personally I have always found the pulling power of a Morgan to be pretty good and all the other owners that I know are younger than me (and I'm not 75, yet, either) but that one can go on the list as well thank you - Fanny Magnet - keeping this on topic I'm sure the new TVR will excel in this area too.
But, despite your protestations, even you know only full well that you are the anomaly and not the norm. smile
Well, if your point is that older male drivers tend to drive Morgans, then of course I would agree, however, your assertion that they are all over 75 is not defensible as well you know and was, I suspect, made in the best interests of humour - which I do appreciate. I will make no further comment about the physical attractiveness of any potential female passengers for fear of retaliation.

After Googling such things to check out the facts however, it seems that the majority of all new car buyers in the UK (as opposed to leasers) are in fact the Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) by a quite significant margin it seems, and as I understand that most Morgans are purchased new outright, it could be logical to assume that the main age demographic for new Morgan ownership is somewhere between 53 and 71, which is actually where I fit; thus more likely making myself the norm and not an anomaly. Not exact science I admit but with some substance at least.

Interestingly though and getting back on topic, this new TVR is exactly that, only available new, and we could maybe therefore assume that the majority of buyers for a few years will also be Baby Boomers, thus adding another comparative indicator to the list - age demographic - in the interests of a bit of accuracy, maybe some readers who are potential new TVR owners might indicate if they are Baby Boomers or not to validate this.



BJWoods

5,015 posts

285 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Pricing seems about what it was. My 1992 Griffith was c. £28,000 new.
If I compare my salary then and use the same multiplier today it works out pretty close.
+1


my 1998 Griff 500 was £38000 and that was without, full leather, hydratrak and aircon, which would pushed the price over £40k

BJWoods

5,015 posts

285 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
TA14 said:
Good point. Many on here say a TVR is a front engine crate V8 with a seventy year history but in reality the V8 cars were introduced by PRW (ignoring the handful of sixties cars) barely twenty years time span with V6 cars over a longer time and Trevor was amazed and disappointed that they never produced a mid-engine car.
ahem.. how can you "ignore" V8 Griffith 200/400 and V8 Tuscan (in 60s and 70s) not least because of the names being reused for the 90s Griffith..



Edited by BJWoods on Tuesday 29th August 15:10

suffolk009

5,436 posts

166 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Go and tell it to Rolls Royce, Bentley, Bugatti, etc.
What have these current entities got in common with Mr Rolls and Mr Royce and the other people who started those companies? Nothing except an ethos about how cars should be.

Given staff turn over in companies it's unlikely there's anyone left at Lotus who had anything to do with even the original Elise let alone anything before that. Colin Chapman is just a bloke in photos on the wall who's thoughts about how a car should be still inform their designs.

While Morgan, Ferrari and Porsche still have the real DNA in the boardroom (I think), once everyone around the table gets the idea, the bloodline is just nice to have.
Indeed. And I'm not sure how many people at the Woking based and largely Bahranian financed company McLaren Automotive ever worked with Bruce.


Edited by suffolk009 on Tuesday 29th August 16:36

Plug Life

978 posts

92 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
True but hopefully you don't have to be over 75 to own one or be married to a lady that resembles a deflated party balloon? biggrin
You don't if you are The Hamster!

PAUL500

2,635 posts

247 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
The big difference is that all the above have a direct lineage to the originator.

The new TVR is the same as the new Triumph, bought as a name only but with the same ethos as the original company.

All the smoke and mirrors stops soon anyway, lets see what appears.

If it takes this long to produce one show car then I think the depositors will be waiting some time yet before they have a car to use.

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

254 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
PAUL500 said:
If it takes this long to produce one show car then I think the depositors will be waiting some time yet before they have a car to use.
In fairness, I think they started teasing the car very early in the process. It takes 3-5 years to get a concept to fruition. Maybe building that early deposit book was important for reassuring investors that there would be a market for the car?

The downside being that by the time the actual car is ready, we might feel a bit jaded or over-familiar with the idea of it. Impatience becomes resignation.

Timing the unveiling of the show-car is also a balance. You could be too early or too late.

I'm not jaded or resigned - I'm excited. And I'm not having one. Just excited.

Funk

26,300 posts

210 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all

Gio G

2,946 posts

210 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
Funk said:
Really looking forward to seeing this being revealed... If the proportions are correct in this image - 400 bhp per tonne, it is going to be wild!

Good luck to the TVR crew in making this a success..

G

DonkeyApple

55,419 posts

170 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
I really like it and we haven't seen the back end which is supposed to be very striking.

It's a good shape, not too lairy so as to attract the most number of consumers. I'm sure lairier ones will follow and of course, the convention with TVRs is to add lairy via the spray gun.

Those expecting the theatre of an equivalent to how a Sag compared to the market when it first appeared were always going to be disappointed. Given how many mass produced cars are so heavily styled these days you'd have to ram something through every corner of Halfords and then stick a pair of enormous rubber tits on the front to achieve a similar impact these days.

I still think that £100k for a GM designed car with a Cossie engine is ridiculously cheap in today's crazy world.

stuckmojo

2,983 posts

189 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
I love the look of it.

daveco

4,130 posts

208 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
stuckmojo said:
I love the look of it.
+1 has a hint of Merc SLS about it, but sleeker imo.

Love TVR, ever since that Jeremy Clarkson special where the Cerbera obliterated an entire field of contemporary supercars I've wanted one.

Vocht

1,631 posts

165 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
A small, 400hp per tonne, 5.0 Cosworth engined, manual british sports car that's "very, very loud". What's there not to love?

Yes £90k is a lot of money, and TVR should be the "everyman superman" but who cares, lets hope they make a success of the relaunch and can create lower cost models in the future!

swisstoni

17,042 posts

280 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
The one big issue for me?
Will the wheels fit my Tuscan? hehe

blade7

11,311 posts

217 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
Funk said:
How long have new TVR been in existence...

Robmarriott

2,641 posts

159 months

Wednesday 6th September 2017
quotequote all
Can anyone moaning about it not being connected to the original TVR company actually afford one?