RE: More Honda NSXs coming to the UK!

RE: More Honda NSXs coming to the UK!

Author
Discussion

Bladedancer

1,279 posts

197 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
borat52 said:
You would be mad to choose one of these ahead of a mclaren/turbo S imho.
There's as someone mentioned the exclusivity and exotic nature of the car.
I personally wouldn't go for Porsche cause they just sound wrong to me.
McLaren - that's more like it.
But I'd probably still end up with a tuned GTR...

Loyly

18,002 posts

160 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I absolutely love these. Owning one would be a petrolhead dream for me. I'd walk straight past the ubiquitous 911 and McLaren options to get to the NSX. It's something different and quite exotic in it's class. The pleasure of owning such a well respected badge contrary to the opinion of the feckless journos who deride it for being Japanese would be delightful.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
WCZ said:
borat52 said:
You would be mad to choose one of these ahead of a mclaren/turbo S imho.
this, other than for the exclusivity of one
I'm a huge fan of the original NSX, Honda in general and badge means nothing to me. However, from all the reviews I've read the baby McLaren does seem like the better car for the money in most respects, and probably the 911 Turbo as well. Shame, as it's nice to have variety in any sector.

MonkeyBusiness

3,937 posts

188 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I was lucky enough to see an NSX whilst out in the dales.

Its been a while since I've seen a 'wow' car. Didn't know it was a Honda until I had a nosey.

Beautiful car.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

238 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Bladedancer said:
borat52 said:
You would be mad to choose one of these ahead of a mclaren/turbo S imho.
There's as someone mentioned the exclusivity and exotic nature of the car.
I personally wouldn't go for Porsche cause they just sound wrong to me.
McLaren - that's more like it.
But I'd probably still end up with a tuned GTR...
Ultimately, it's good to have the choice. I don't prefer the Honda, but I'm pleased it exists.

WJNB

2,637 posts

162 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
...............I'm pleased it exists.
I concur with that refreshing broadminded view.
Variety is fun, maybe not for Honda but that's not my problem.


unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all

In our ever-smaller and more cross-cultural world, it can be a challenge to classify some vehicles. PH and PH commenters say the NSX is Japanese. The brand name, Honda, certainly is.

But there's also this...

"Unlike the first generation NSX which was manufactured in Japan, the new NSX was designed and engineered in Marysville, Ohio, at Honda's plant, by designer Michelle Christensen and chief engineer Ted Klaus."

And this...

"Honda's $70 million NSX factory also serves as a laboratory"



hondansx

4,570 posts

226 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
WCZ said:
borat52 said:
You would be mad to choose one of these ahead of a mclaren/turbo S imho.
this, other than for the exclusivity of one
Mad, why? The Porsche is dull and common. And I'm saying it as a Porsche owner and fan!

The McLaren, perhaps fair enough. Although various reports seem to match the two cars very closely.

Despite being a big original NSX fan, I agree I wouldn't pay the money for exclusivity. It should have been cheaper than the 911 Turbo.

HokumPokum

2,051 posts

206 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
should depreciate accordingly in my view. i like one just not at 150k basic.

borat52

564 posts

209 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
hondansx said:
Mad, why? The Porsche is dull and common. And I'm saying it as a Porsche owner and fan!

The McLaren, perhaps fair enough. Although various reports seem to match the two cars very closely.

Despite being a big original NSX fan, I agree I wouldn't pay the money for exclusivity. It should have been cheaper than the 911 Turbo.
Just my opinion from a test drive.
The car doesn't seem to have benefitted from the hybrid drive. It's as though they did it just to be high tech without regard to the goal.
Lighter and RWD would be interesting.

At £100k this car would make more sense but I was blown away with how a supposedly cutting edge jap car was so technologically outdated in the cabin.

It's also very fat. As a current R35 GTR owner it was a less exciting prospect than the GTR which launched in 2007!

Throw some tuning at a GTR and you've got something quicker than the NSX on the track and in a straight line.

Also the options list was a real gem. A rebadged ctek charger was £300 from memory.

You can easily price these up to £180k with ceramics and carbon bits.

It just didn't seem the right car for that price market.
I heard the order book went very soft, many people I know cancelled deposits and the dealer was able to fill orders to new customers within 3 months despite telling the press they were sold out.

mholt1995

567 posts

82 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Someone in my town has one in silver and my god it's absolutely beautiful (and I'm not even a supercar man). Keep meaning to get a picture but it's usually heading in the other direction when I see it, it was a car behind me a few weeks back, would've looked a tit trying to take a picture of it though

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all

Evo magazine gave this car 4.5 of 5.0 stars. Road & Track awarded it 2017 Performance Car of the Year.

I'd choose the NSX for its clever integration of electric motors and ICE. Being a newly-arrived challenger in a segment with familiar choices is a bonus of sorts.


hondansx

4,570 posts

226 months

Wednesday 30th August 2017
quotequote all
borat52 said:
Just my opinion from a test drive.
The car doesn't seem to have benefitted from the hybrid drive. It's as though they did it just to be high tech without regard to the goal.
Lighter and RWD would be interesting.

At £100k this car would make more sense but I was blown away with how a supposedly cutting edge jap car was so technologically outdated in the cabin.

It's also very fat. As a current R35 GTR owner it was a less exciting prospect than the GTR which launched in 2007!

Throw some tuning at a GTR and you've got something quicker than the NSX on the track and in a straight line.

Also the options list was a real gem. A rebadged ctek charger was £300 from memory.

You can easily price these up to £180k with ceramics and carbon bits.

It just didn't seem the right car for that price market.
I heard the order book went very soft, many people I know cancelled deposits and the dealer was able to fill orders to new customers within 3 months despite telling the press they were sold out.
Interesting to hear. But perhaps as the last poster has alluded to, a test drive is not enough to really assess the car.

I appreciate though, for the money we're talking here, no-one should feel like they are taking a chance with the car.

HPGeezer

1 posts

101 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
Having waited over 5 years and never driven an NSX before i was amazed by the car.
Build quality was average, paint was stunning, kerb appeal mega.
The best bit though was selling on for a great premium.
Not many cars allow that nowadays.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 11th October 2017
quotequote all
Well, that's just lovely. Very lovely.