RE: Bugatti Chiron sets 0-400kph-0 world record

RE: Bugatti Chiron sets 0-400kph-0 world record

Author
Discussion

J4CKO

41,623 posts

201 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Dynamic Space Wizard said:
J4CKO said:
i get what the name represents, Italian, well made, special, fast, beautiful
French
Ettore Bugatti was born in Italy, I always think of them as Italian but yes the cars were mainly built in France.

WCZ

10,537 posts

195 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Zombie said:
Really does nothing for me. Big numbers (and little ones) but that's it, there doesn't appear to be any emotion. And the door handles ruin the lines, not that it is much of a looker.

I'd take a Ferrari any day of the week over it. A 599 GTO would do...
ferrari don't make any car anywhere near the level of the veyron/chiron in terms of build quality, power delivery, etc
this is a GT car and the 599 gto is absolutely not a gt car

always the same stupid comments about veyrons/chirons on here

re: the price
most owners own yachts that cost millions just in annual maintence yachts etc, this isn't a big deal

WCZ

10,537 posts

195 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
frankenstein12 said:
Well this is the video of the old Bug against the Agera R. Bear in mind this is the R not the more powerful 1 to One.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DH5j4PYp-o

Also worth bearing in mind that technically the Regera is the new Chirons more direct competitor and from the sounds of it the Regera would destroy the Chiron in a drag race.

The Regera stats are pretty crazy. Rough estimates put it at 0-249mph in 20 seconds. Given the Agera 1 to One record was 17 seconds 0-200-0 broken down as 6.5 seconds braking from 200-0 at a guess the Regera will do 0-249-0 in about 30-35 seconds if we allow 10-15 seconds for braking.

That would make it around 7-12 seconds faster than the Chiron 0-249-0.

According to CVK the Regera will spin its wheels at 180mph.

Edited by frankenstein12 on Monday 11th September 23:25
it's a shame the reliability is awful on the them
the bug has traction which might help it vs the Reg

EmilA

1,527 posts

158 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
I still want to know what they were using to record the car!

ZxrL

2 posts

80 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Keonigsegg One:1 or Regera?

One:1 did 0-186-0 in 17.95 seconds

Regera is 0-250mph in around 20 seconds (I read somewhere in the internet)

Or following suit of others, M140i JB4 & Decat

E65Ross

35,100 posts

213 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
EmilA said:
I still want to know what they were using to record the car!
Almost certainly another Chiron, no?

TIGA84

5,210 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
So much hatred for something that might not be the most beautiful thing ever on 4 wheels, but for the fact that you can go from 0-250mph and back again in under a minute, then pop down to the kebab shop without a team of engineers, changing the bodywork, changing the gearing and then doing the same thing, day in, day out and only having to have it serviced every few thousand miles like every other normal car is nothing short of incredible.

The engineering on it must be just mindblowing.

People saying "I'd take a Ferrari over it any day" are missing the point entirely. Anyone that is lucky enough to have one and it be their only "special" car, or something that they bought themselves as a 40/50/60th present for doing well are going to be in a very very small minority, if at all.

Monkeylegend

26,444 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
So much hatred for something that might not be the most beautiful thing ever on 4 wheels, but for the fact that you can go from 0-250mph and back again in under a minute, then pop down to the kebab shop without a team of engineers, changing the bodywork, changing the gearing and then doing the same thing, day in, day out and only having to have it serviced every few thousand miles like every other normal car is nothing short of incredible.

The engineering on it must be just mindblowing.

People saying "I'd take a Ferrari over it any day" are missing the point entirely. Anyone that is lucky enough to have one and it be their only "special" car, or something that they bought themselves as a 40/50/60th present for doing well are going to be in a very very small minority, if at all.
If the Chiron is the same as the Veyron I don't know of any other ordinary car that needs a new set of tyres every 2.5k miles and a new set of alloy wheels at 7.5k miles plus tyres, or costs £13k or so for it's first service. Normal it is definitely not.

At those prices you would expect it to be mindblowing wink

stooch

4 posts

139 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
my mates silver Astravan 1.3 is quicker.


..... someone had to post that...

TIGA84

5,210 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
If the Chiron is the same as the Veyron I don't know of any other ordinary car that needs a new set of tyres every 2.5k miles and a new set of alloy wheels at 7.5k miles plus tyres, or costs £13k or so for it's first service. Normal it is definitely not.

At those prices you would expect it to be mindblowing wink
This is true, but comparatively speaking, a £13000 odd service on a £1.8m car is the same % value as your £1500 service on a £200k Ferrari, give or take. Its just scale, which is even more impressive, I'd have though it to be much more.

Wheels and tyres aside of course but lets not worry about consumables....... wink

Monkeylegend

26,444 posts

232 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
Monkeylegend said:
If the Chiron is the same as the Veyron I don't know of any other ordinary car that needs a new set of tyres every 2.5k miles and a new set of alloy wheels at 7.5k miles plus tyres, or costs £13k or so for it's first service. Normal it is definitely not.

At those prices you would expect it to be mindblowing wink
This is true, but comparatively speaking, a £13000 odd service on a £1.8m car is the same % value as your £1500 service on a £200k Ferrari, give or take. Its just scale, which is even more impressive, I'd have though it to be much more.

Wheels and tyres aside of course but lets not worry about consumables....... wink
Not knocking the Chiron/Veyron, it is an amazing car and an amazing piece of automotive engineering to be able to everything it does.

I followed a Veyron through London a few years ago in stop start traffic and it seemed like every other normal car in terms of its ability to just poodle around. I even managed to keep up with it in my diesel steed.

Fetchez la vache

5,574 posts

215 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
461098 said:
Can't believe the attitude of some people on here....
You get used to it...

KTF

9,809 posts

151 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
EmilA said:
I still want to know what they were using to record the car!
Record the car?

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
Yipper said:
E65Ross said:
Yipper said:
Roughly 10% faster than an F1 car, for -65% less money...
10% faster at what? Certainly not at going round a race track! Bit of a pointless comparison really....
Top speed.

F1 = 232mph
Chiron = 261mph.
I suppose if F1 cars were built to maximise top speed instead of speed round a race track your point would have some relevance, but as they are not your point doesn't.
yes An F1 car has a terrible drag coefficient; so much so that it's often said that backing off in an F1 car generates the same deceleration as braking in a normal road car (~1.0g). In terms of the compromise between cornering and straight line performance, they're way way over towards cornering, which is the case for all single seaters on that ladder (so I'm talking GP2, GP3, FR etc and ruling out Indycar).

What's remarkable about the Chiron is the ease of use, refinement and fit and finish. I'm sure that Ultima could equal the performance stats, but where Bugatti score is in making it as driveable and usable (money aside!) as a Golf.

monty158

47 posts

173 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
TheBigUnit said:
phil121081 said:
Any other suggestions are more than welcome...

Golf R?
Chipped 535D.
Remapped Skoda Fabia VRS

Focus ST (in Orange)

frankenstein12

1,915 posts

97 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
EmilA said:
I still want to know what they were using to record the car!
Usain Bolt?

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
So much hatred for something that might not be the most beautiful thing ever on 4 wheels, but for the fact that you can go from 0-250mph and back again in under a minute, then pop down to the kebab shop without a team of engineers, changing the bodywork, changing the gearing and then doing the same thing, day in, day out and only having to have it serviced every few thousand miles like every other normal car is nothing short of incredible.

The engineering on it must be just mindblowing.

People saying "I'd take a Ferrari over it any day" are missing the point entirely. Anyone that is lucky enough to have one and it be their only "special" car, or something that they bought themselves as a 40/50/60th present for doing well are going to be in a very very small minority, if at all.
Not sure its hatred, but maybe its a question of relevance. I don't know of anywhere here in the UK or London where I could do 250 mph and then pop down to a kebab shop, without being killed by traffic.

If you do, then more power to you, and feel free to buy this and post up the video of your achievement.

frankenstein12

1,915 posts

97 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
WCZ said:
frankenstein12 said:
Well this is the video of the old Bug against the Agera R. Bear in mind this is the R not the more powerful 1 to One.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DH5j4PYp-o

Also worth bearing in mind that technically the Regera is the new Chirons more direct competitor and from the sounds of it the Regera would destroy the Chiron in a drag race.

The Regera stats are pretty crazy. Rough estimates put it at 0-249mph in 20 seconds. Given the Agera 1 to One record was 17 seconds 0-200-0 broken down as 6.5 seconds braking from 200-0 at a guess the Regera will do 0-249-0 in about 30-35 seconds if we allow 10-15 seconds for braking.

That would make it around 7-12 seconds faster than the Chiron 0-249-0.

According to CVK the Regera will spin its wheels at 180mph.

Edited by frankenstein12 on Monday 11th September 23:25
it's a shame the reliability is awful on the them
the bug has traction which might help it vs the Reg
My understanding is the earlier ccx etc had some reliability issues however the Agera models were much more reliable.

Unfortunately their reliability reputation was tarnished again by a petulant and disgruntled US owner who decided to launch a big rant online and anywhere else he could over an Agera he had ordered which had some issues which were related to the car being rush finished to get it to the states.

coppice

8,623 posts

145 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
I think we need to differentiate between indifference and 'hatred' . All most of us are doing most of the time is exchanging opinions . I may think the Chiron , like the Veyron is an absurd folly - and thus not something to covet- but the fact that such daftness exists at all is worthy of celebration.

Somebody asked what a modern Type 35 would look like and that is a bloody good question. It wouldn't be an elephantine Chiron , that is clear , but what the hell would it be and what would it have ? Lightness , compact dimensions , exquisite looks and a lot of speed - round corners and down the straights. Still struggling - closest I can come to is the 40 year old Stratos or the quickest of the Elise/ Exige clan . But neither's quite there - struggling !

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
coppice said:
I think we need to differentiate between indifference and 'hatred' . All most of us are doing most of the time is exchanging opinions . I may think the Chiron , like the Veyron is an absurd folly - and thus not something to covet- but the fact that such daftness exists at all is worthy of celebration.

Somebody asked what a modern Type 35 would look like and that is a bloody good question. It wouldn't be an elephantine Chiron , that is clear , but what the hell would it be and what would it have ? Lightness , compact dimensions , exquisite looks and a lot of speed - round corners and down the straights. Still struggling - closest I can come to is the 40 year old Stratos or the quickest of the Elise/ Exige clan . But neither's quite there - struggling !
yes I think I speak for a lot of people in that I have a lot of respect and interest in Bugatti's Veyron and Chiron, but no real lust for them. I wouldn't go out of my way to drive one for example, whereas I would cross the country to drive a new Lotus and cross the world to drive a McLaren F1 or Pagani Zonda. For me, the Chiron is like the latest robot or TV - I have a keen engineering interest, but not a driving/automotive interest in one. Out of interest, that's how I feel about most VAG cars, so Bugatti fits the family well in that respect.

I too don't think there's any modern equivalent of Bugatti's original creations like the Type 35. If Pagani built an Elise it might get close I suppose?

Edited by RobM77 on Tuesday 12th September 15:59