RE: Megane Renault Sport IV - Frankfurt 2017

RE: Megane Renault Sport IV - Frankfurt 2017

Author
Discussion

roadie

645 posts

263 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
I think the headlights and especially the foglights look a bit fussy and are certainly a matter of form over function, but the rest of the car looks good.

Vocht

1,631 posts

165 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
KPB1973 said:
Thank you, much appreciated. The videos floating around (i.e. Evo's) show them pretty clearly too. Sutcliffe says they're the same as the GT's. They look more attractive than the MK3's boggo ones.
I'm not sure if they're standard or optional tbh. Nice either way. They remind me of the seats from an old 205 Gti.


nickfrog

21,192 posts

218 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Vocht said:
Thx for the pic.

The seat base bolsters look very high - that's great but I would be surprised if they fit those seats to the non-Cup car. Good news if they do though !

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

152 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
framerateuk said:
The same type they've been fitting to the Clio 200/220 since launch.

Comparing the ride of the 220 Trophy to my old Megane 250, it's much firmer (expected for anything with Trophy in the title), but when you're really going on a rough road, the ride does feel smoother and less crashy than the Megane did. (not that there was anything wrong with the Megane, but the Clio does feel like a bit of a step up).
Very interesting comparison, thanks! Good to hear that it doesn't fall apart when pushing on over a bad road. Bit the same dilemma with the Clio for me -- would definitely get a Trophy but would prefer the standard suspension and smaller rims. Defo a 1st world problem though.

Quickmoose

4,495 posts

124 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
could easily be mistaken for a 308..it looks like a big clio, which I suppose is what it is.
rofl

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. That is one of the most deluded post i've ever read on here. You don't seriously believe that do you?

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Double D re-addressed it and corrected you perfectly, so i really don't need to. You had me that lost for words.

I don't think you've replied to him yet, have you?

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
His first word was "No", which means a disagreement. I'm finding it extremely ironic that you are questioning my intellectual prowess when you can't understand something as simple as that wink

The "punters" don't make the cars, the manufacturers do. Those manufacturers have to be making cars that are more efficient and comply with the ever-stricter emission laws each time. All we're hearing at current is the death of the ICE. It's all about emissions right now. You'd have to be fairly deluded to see otherwise, which i have already stated. That's the main focus of car "progress" right now.

"Nasp" engines are a dying breed. All white-goods vehicles are going turbo and performance cars are going the same way. Supercars are not sold in the volumes that everyday cars are, so they really don't matter. Also, it's rare that they are used alot anyway, so again, not a big deal. Many Ferrari's and other exotics are going turbo too and hyper cars are even being aided by electric power.

Forced induction does come with some advantages and us car people are the minority, meaning that most other people who drive probably couldn't care less. But yes, there certainly are laws that are dictating it because, if you believe that the Government are striving for at current, we won't be in ICE's for much longer our vehicles will be dominated by emissions and efficiency. The "punters" have no say in the matter!

Anyway, you're getting upset at the wrong person. I'll await your response to Double D, which you are yet to do.

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Oh the hypocrisy. To quote yourself...

anonymous said:
[redacted]
You must be severely irony-impaired wink

nickfrog

21,192 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
Yes another cmoosed thread.

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
Yes another cmoosed thread.
If you listen carefully, you can still hear that distinctive noise in the background that is the echoes of severe back-peddling.

Quickmoose

4,495 posts

124 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
I know having he last word is like a flame to a moth....but any chances of discussing the Megane?
or even with a little bit of scope creep where the impetus for FI over NA came from... rather than...this?

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
Quickmoose said:
or even with a little bit of scope creep where the impetus for FI over NA came from... rather than...this?

Renault has quite a history of FI hatches/cars, several of which were top of their respective class or thereabouts. More emissions driven than solely performance like back in the 80s/90s though

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
One potential issue i've got is if this new 1.8 might be a bit laggy? Saying that, the Peugeot 308 GTI and RCZ R have similar performance levels but from only 1.6 litres and i don't believe they were criticised for being specifically as such. No more so than any other turbo, anyway.

Also, peak torque from 2400 RPM onwards. Is that a bit high? I'm nit-picking here obviously but those are the only real things that could be a bit of a hindrance that i can think of. The EDC may actually help the Megane here more so than the Clio. I think it's set to be another great Renaultsport product.

Edited by culpz on Wednesday 13th September 13:37

ZX10R NIN

27,640 posts

126 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
A bit of lag would imply it'll have a strong top end, the thing with Golf R's etc is that they seem to run out of puff at the top end of the rev range (which for me is the point of a turbo car, I understand I'm probably in the minority) the only one I've driven recently that didn't do this was an A45 AMG & the turbo is bigger on that so it does have a bit of lag.

I don't see it as a bad thing I don't want a turbo that's pretending to be a N/A.

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
The MK3 Renaultsport Megane had a fairly linear power band, as far as i'm aware, so you got power throughout the whole rev range, pretty much. You still get that turbo shove at the lower end but you don't appear to lose out up top. Maybe they're going for something similar again with this one?

Robmarriott

2,641 posts

159 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
roystinho said:
hondansx said:
I can beat LY; i saw a 182 the other day it was I believe was called 'Petrol Blue'. Oh so subtle, but incredible depth.

Was that available again for any other Renault Sport model?
It was available on the Clio V6, but not 1 was sold in the UK. I'm not sure for abroad, I have a feeling there may be 1 out there.

As for the Megane, like it as an all rounder. I'll wait for the Trophy version to see if I go for one. Almost seems perfect for the family that can double up as a B road/track weapon. Ideally it would allow me to get another Clio V6 for sunny days and no kids too...
Petrol blue was on 1 Clio V6 and a handful of 182s, lucky to see one at all!

It's a lovely colour.

nickfrog

21,192 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Judging me by your own standards. Unsurprisingly.

nickfrog

21,192 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
culpz said:
The MK3 Renaultsport Megane had a fairly linear power band, as far as i'm aware, so you got power throughout the whole rev range, pretty much. You still get that turbo shove at the lower end but you don't appear to lose out up top. Maybe they're going for something similar again with this one?
I hope they can emulate the kind of un-turbo like delivery of the MK3 indeed - it's so well mapped, it being a turbo becomes an idiosyncrasy rather than an hindrance.

M1C

1,834 posts

112 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
This thead is about the new Megane RS, please can people stop spoiling it with the stupid squabbling.