Manchester Airport

Author
Discussion

kitz

Original Poster:

328 posts

177 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Why is Manchester Airport a horrible unmitigated dump ?

Kawasicki

13,083 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
kitz said:
Why is Manchester Airport a horrible unmitigated dump ?
I travel a bit. I agree with you, it gives a really bad first impression of the whole area. It looks like it got a bit of an update in the mid 90's and not one penny has been spent on anything since.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Not been to Manchester Airport for years but it was never a particularly nice place to be.

Part of me thinks that it's because the majority of its "customers" have no choice but to use it and/or don't really care - as long as the bar is serving beer at 7am, the duty free shop is selling cheap fags and the plane to Magaluf sets off on time then who cares?

Shopping centres have plenty of competition so have to work hard to keep the customers coming to their shopping centre - airports don't.

The Big G

990 posts

168 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
I guess you've never travelled though Luton airport before then!

On a more serious note. The airport is at the beginning of a £1bn redevelopment of terminal 2 and possibly terminal 1. The roadways are also being updated and changed to work "better" with estimated traffic flow. This is along with the new dual carriage way from the east (Manchester Airport Relief Road). Come back in a few years and I'm sure it'll feel a lot different. If in the interim, it'll feel like a building site!

NerveAgent

3,314 posts

220 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Because it hasn't had much money thrown at it over the years.

It is set for a £1bn overhaul though. We will see!

MDMA .

8,895 posts

101 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Because : not London.

NickCQ

5,392 posts

96 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
Because : not London.
snore. Have you been to Luton or Stansted recently?
It's also a private company so not sure how it fits into the North/South fiscal divide agenda.

swamp

994 posts

189 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Budget airlines pressure airports to keep landing fees as low as possible.

J4CKO

41,558 posts

200 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
NickCQ said:
MDMA . said:
Because : not London.
snore. Have you been to Luton or Stansted recently?
It's also a private company so not sure how it fits into the North/South fiscal divide agenda.
It makes a lot of money, the OP is talking about the finish of the older terminals which is a bit 90s, however there are massive developments going on.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/bu...

http://mantp.co.uk/

Loads of info out there, masses going on around the airport as well, loads of new industrial space, new link road from the east

http://www.semmms.info/

The airport is owned by MAG (Manchester Airport Group), a holding company which is in turn owned by the Manchester councils and some private investors, it also owns Bournemouth, East Midlands and Stansted, they did try to buy Gatwick but couldn't agree on a price.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Can't say I've seen an airport in the UK that's noteworthy over Manchester yet... They're all just generic buildings that stink of Jet A1.

Chucklehead

2,733 posts

208 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
NickCQ said:
MDMA . said:
Because : not London.
snore. Have you been to Luton or Stansted recently?
It's also a private company so not sure how it fits into the North/South fiscal divide agenda.
Stansted has improved a lot in the last couple years - way better than it was. Besides, isn't Stansted owned by Manchester Airport Group??

Luton Airport is a fking hole though.

Shay HTFC

3,588 posts

189 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Every British airport I've been in seems like a complete dump.

I'm always surprised at some of the walkways back from the plane to passport control. Mr. fancy pants from Munich steps off the plane and his first experience of the UK is a sort of shabby behind-the-scenes corridor straight out of a Tesco stockroom, barely wide enough for three people, and winding around until it everything reaches passport control. It's weird! (I think that was at Manchester, but not sure)

Cneci

79 posts

111 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Shay HTFC said:
Every British airport I've been in seems like a complete dump.
If you've travelled to/from LHR (in particular T2 + T5) and still think the same then your standards must be very, very high.

J4CKO

41,558 posts

200 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Not sure what you are all expecting, runway, air bridge, passport control, baggage reclaim, transport and get the fk out asap, applies to any airport. On the way out Manchester is fine, the departures areas are the same as anywhere else, shops and overpriced restaurants, people forcing booze down at stupid o clock.


Colonial

13,553 posts

205 months

Saturday 23rd September 2017
quotequote all
I prefer flying into Manchester to London. Means I am further away from London for a start.

I can get flights from Sydney to Manchester with Etihad, Singapore or Cathay with only one stop so serves my purposes well.

Airports are just boring places that you have to be in. I'm more concerned about quickly moving through customs and getting out than the quality of the carpet.

Crumpet

3,894 posts

180 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
There's one terminal (3?) where there's a gate between security and the departure lounge. If there's a flight disembarking you have to stand and wait for ten minutes while everyone gets off. Awful design and I've never seen it anywhere else!

As for the terminal buildings themselves I don't really know what they can do. They're old buildings with low ceilings and little space which is at odds with the modern airports with high ceilings and seemingly acres of open space.

On the other hand I think it functions well enough compared to anywhere else; everything is acceptably efficient it just looks a bit st and tatty in the process. Food is cheap if you take the Boots / Smiths meal deals as well!

I'd take Manchester over Charles de Gaulle and Amsterdam any day!

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
They should give it a new name

Bland Airport

popeyewhite

19,871 posts

120 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
Another vote for Manchester. In my view certainly better than than Gatwick , Heathrow or Liverpool. It has it's faults. The only airport in my experience that's a pleasant experience is Zurich.

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Sunday 24th September 2017
quotequote all
Aldergrove these days is much better