RE: Porsche rolls out 680hp wagon

RE: Porsche rolls out 680hp wagon

Author
Discussion

Charlie Michael

2,750 posts

184 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
rob.e said:
So how big is the boot then?

They should come up with some sort of "boot to torque" ratio.. see if they can get one up on audi with that one too.
It's amazing isn't it that an article about an estate car doesn't actually feature a single photo of the boot.

here you (and everyone) go:




Please show us all the relevant photos when writing an article PH.

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Torque is a force, and force applied to a mass makes acceleration, F=MA

Power is work done in a given time.

The gearing affects the torque at the wheels, so yes engine torque, gearing and mass determine acceleration.

Toltec

7,159 posts

223 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Nice hot hatch, will they be doing a diesel version?

Ares

11,000 posts

120 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
hi court said:
Are jaguar doing xfr wagon yet?

Really can't see why you would buy one if you need an estate, and if you don't need an estate why not just buy the normal panamara?

Rs6 gets my vote. Or this, if only it was a foot longer.
Jag don't even do an XFR! Big gap. Hottest XF is the 380ps 'S'.

Ares

11,000 posts

120 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Toltec said:
Nice hot hatch, will they be doing a diesel version?
rolleyes

TSCfree

1,681 posts

231 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Toltec said:
Nice hot hatch, will they be doing a diesel version?
hehe

Oooh a sports tourismo or sports tourer in other words. Not an estate or wagon at all then!


E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
bertie said:
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Torque is a force, and force applied to a mass makes acceleration, F=MA

Power is work done in a given time.

The gearing affects the torque at the wheels, so yes engine torque, gearing and mass determine acceleration.
100% agree. Although torque/weight is an utterly meaningless ratio, but power to weight isn't, because it takes into account torque, mass and gearing.....

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
bertie said:
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Torque is a force, and force applied to a mass makes acceleration, F=MA

Power is work done in a given time.

The gearing affects the torque at the wheels, so yes engine torque, gearing and mass determine acceleration.
100% agree. Although torque/weight is an utterly meaningless ratio, but power to weight isn't, because it takes into account torque, mass and gearing.....
It's about torque and not power as you can do more work (ie higher power) simply by having the same torque at a higher speed (rpm)

Anyway...stepping away from the GCSE physics...nice estate car.

E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
bertie said:
E65Ross said:
bertie said:
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Torque is a force, and force applied to a mass makes acceleration, F=MA

Power is work done in a given time.

The gearing affects the torque at the wheels, so yes engine torque, gearing and mass determine acceleration.
100% agree. Although torque/weight is an utterly meaningless ratio, but power to weight isn't, because it takes into account torque, mass and gearing.....
It's about torque and not power as you can do more work (ie higher power)......
Does anyone else spot the flaw in that sentence? You've actually said it's NOT about power, and then you have put in brackets that effectively it IS about power.

I'm not saying torque isn't important, far from it. I've just been saying that torque/weight is utterly meaningly, which it is, because it doesn't take gearing into account; whereas power to weight does....

underphil

1,246 posts

210 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
This car is an auto with many gears, so peak torque becomes a meaningless concept - when you put your foot to the floor the gearbox will put you to near enough peak power...

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Nanook said:
.....

bertie said:
Torque is a force
No it's not, so the rest of your post is wrong.
Yes it is.

"Torque is defined as a twisting force that tends to cause rotation."

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/engli...

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
Does anyone else spot the flaw in that sentence? You've actually said it's NOT about power, and then you have put in brackets that effectively it IS about power.

I'm not saying torque isn't important, far from it. I've just been saying that torque/weight is utterly meaningly, which it is, because it doesn't take gearing into account; whereas power to weight does....
Torque is the force applied and that is what accelerates a mass.

Power is the rate of work done and the result of the force applied.

Both torque and power figures quoted by manufacturers are flywheel so don't take account of gearing.

E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
bertie said:
E65Ross said:
Does anyone else spot the flaw in that sentence? You've actually said it's NOT about power, and then you have put in brackets that effectively it IS about power.

I'm not saying torque isn't important, far from it. I've just been saying that torque/weight is utterly meaningly, which it is, because it doesn't take gearing into account; whereas power to weight does....
Torque is the force applied and that is what accelerates a mass.

Power is the rate of work done and the result of the force applied.

Both torque and power figures quoted by manufacturers are flywheel so don't take account of gearing.
Yes, I agree. But back to my original point....are you saying that what I'm saying is incorrect? And that is "torque to weight is meaningless, whereas power to weight has more relevance to performance".

You'll generally find that cars with a higher power to weight will be faster accelerating than those with a lower power to weight. That same correlation cannot be said of torque to weight at all. If it was, every diesel would be faster than anything with a high revving, zingy petrol engine. Torque, in the latter instance, is definitely relevant, because as you say, POWER is related to torque and rpm (it revs higher....produces more work with less torque and is thus quicker), but torque to weight as a standalone ratio is meaningless.

alock

4,227 posts

211 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
bertie said:
Torque is a force, and force applied to a mass makes acceleration, F=MA

Power is work done in a given time.

The gearing affects the torque at the wheels, so yes engine torque, gearing and mass determine acceleration.
Example time using your requirements to calculate acceleration.

I have a 1:1 ratio gear.
My car weighs 1 tonne.
My engine produces 200 lb ft of torque at an unknown rpm

How fast does it accelerate?

Can you not see the rpm the torque is created is important? What you want is a number that combines the rpm and the torque.

stuartrav

49 posts

212 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Does anyone know the co2 emissions figure? If under 50 it will make for a very attractive company car just like my Volvo XC90 T8 Hybrid. Under 50 is the holy grail and will make the car a bargain and will probably mean 99% will be sold as company cars.

stuartrav

49 posts

212 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Does anyone know the co2 emissions figure? If under 50 it will make for a very attractive company car just like my Volvo XC90 T8 Hybrid. Under 50 is the holy grail and will make the car a bargain and will probably mean 99% will be sold as company cars.

Anglade

239 posts

120 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
stuartrav said:
Does anyone know the co2 emissions figure? If under 50 it will make for a very attractive company car just like my Volvo XC90 T8 Hybrid. Under 50 is the holy grail and will make the car a bargain and will probably mean 99% will be sold as company cars.
59

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
stuartrav said:
Does anyone know the co2 emissions figure? If under 50 it will make for a very attractive company car just like my Volvo XC90 T8 Hybrid. Under 50 is the holy grail and will make the car a bargain and will probably mean 99% will be sold as company cars.
The normal Panamera 4 hybrid is 59g, the Panamera Turbo S Hybrid (this one) is 69g on the Porsche website.

Would be a great company car option but £140k basic....

Edited by bertie on Wednesday 27th September 15:18

hughclinton

4 posts

142 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Because ......
The engine produces the same torque, but the torque at the wheels is reduced when you choose a higher gear. So you accelerate more slowly in a higher gear, but you travel faster (as you accelerate) and as you do so the power increases with (speed / rpm)

I'm afraid that most of the others contributors are correct. Torque gives you the acceleration, and the power produces goes up with the speed or RPM. which is why you see on a graph of them against RPM, that power as an upward slope and torque tends to be flat as revs increase. The engine twist remains fairly constant (if you measure it with a machine) but the power produced ( by the speed) increases the faster you go. It can be hard to fully appreciate and is more complicated when gearboxes are included. but torque to weight is really the important figure you need to know.

E65Ross

35,081 posts

212 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
hughclinton said:
E65Ross said:
If it's all about torque and nothing to do with power, how come a car with a dead flat torque curve from 1500rpm-6000rpm accelerates up a steep hill faster in 2nd gear from 5000rpm at 30mph than it does from 4th gear at 2000rpm? It'd producing the same torque, so why would one accelerate quicker in a lower gear if it's all about torque and not power? The gearing has no effect on the peak torque the engine is producing, but it does effect the power output to the wheels.
Because ......
The engine produces the same torque, but the torque at the wheels is reduced when you choose a higher gear. So you accelerate more slowly in a higher gear, but you travel faster (as you accelerate) and as you do so the power increases with (speed / rpm)

I'm afraid that most of the others contributors are correct. Torque gives you the acceleration, and the power produces goes up with the speed or RPM. which is why you see on a graph of them against RPM, that power as an upward slope and torque tends to be flat as revs increase. The engine twist remains fairly constant (if you measure it with a machine) but the power produced ( by the speed) increases the faster you go. It can be hard to fully appreciate and is more complicated when gearboxes are included. but torque to weight is really the important figure you need to know.
My "question" was largely tongue in cheek. Torque at the wheels to weight is important, yes....but just peak engine torque to car/vehicle weight isn't simply because it doesn't take the gearbox or the engines rev range into the equation....hence why a low-revving diesel which maxes at 4500rpm may produce more torque to weight yet be slower than a high revving car with lower torque to weight (which has more power to weight)