RE: BMW M550i: Driven

Author
Discussion

Kawasicki

13,096 posts

236 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
hondansx said:
Ares said:
hondansx said:
BMW have lost it as far as i'm concerned. The new M5 already looks dull as ditchwater. Now they're releasing an even more dull verson? No thanks.
Anyone that thinks an M5 will be dull, and an M550i will be 'even duller' is either not an enthusiastic driver, foolish, or a mere troll.

PH* whinges about the downsizing of engines, then BMW launch a 450bhp V8 and PH whinges that it isn't M5 enough.


(*and mostly the PHers that could never be in a position to buy a £90k M5, just critiquing it from their £2,500 stboxes.)
I got a private viewing of the new M5 at Zolder a month or so ago; had to hand in my phone in everything due it being so secretive. And for what? It looked like a 520d. I thought the previous gen M5 was muted, but this one is just as bad, if not worse. And it's not like I like wild cars (the GTS, for example, is atrocious), but any enthusiast wants to look back at their car and think "Phwoar."

In the last decade the 3 Series has taken over from the Mondeo and Vectra, whilst the fugly 1 Series competes with lowly hatchbacks. It just makes me wonder how much longer BMW can lean on their reputation of building driver's cars.

I would argue PH whinges more about the fact that manufacturers are ignoring the fact that we want driver's cars, not just 0-60 times. The 550i is a perfect illustration of this; a great car on paper ideal for pub chat, but not a driver's car. Given that is meant to be BMW's USP, that has to be a disappointing.
Phwoar



Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
hondansx said:
Ares said:
hondansx said:
BMW have lost it as far as i'm concerned. The new M5 already looks dull as ditchwater. Now they're releasing an even more dull verson? No thanks.
Anyone that thinks an M5 will be dull, and an M550i will be 'even duller' is either not an enthusiastic driver, foolish, or a mere troll.

PH* whinges about the downsizing of engines, then BMW launch a 450bhp V8 and PH whinges that it isn't M5 enough.


(*and mostly the PHers that could never be in a position to buy a £90k M5, just critiquing it from their £2,500 stboxes.)
I got a private viewing of the new M5 at Zolder a month or so ago; had to hand in my phone in everything due it being so secretive. And for what? It looked like a 520d. I thought the previous gen M5 was muted, but this one is just as bad, if not worse. And it's not like I like wild cars (the GTS, for example, is atrocious), but any enthusiast wants to look back at their car and think "Phwoar."

In the last decade the 3 Series has taken over from the Mondeo and Vectra, whilst the fugly 1 Series competes with lowly hatchbacks. It just makes me wonder how much longer BMW can lean on their reputation of building driver's cars.

I would argue PH whinges more about the fact that manufacturers are ignoring the fact that we want driver's cars, not just 0-60 times. The 550i is a perfect illustration of this; a great car on paper ideal for pub chat, but not a driver's car. Given that is meant to be BMW's USP, that has to be a disappointing.
How did the M5 drive? Or have you dismissed it purely on looks?
And how did you find the 550i to drive to decide it isn't a drivers car and be therefore disappointed?


If you think the 1-series genuinely competes with lowly hatchbacks, and the 3-series is no better than a Mondeo or Vector (which hasn't existed for years), then there is not wonder you find BMWs (and all cars) dull. Driverless cars would, it seems, be made for you. rolleyes

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
hondansx said:
Ares said:
hondansx said:
BMW have lost it as far as i'm concerned. The new M5 already looks dull as ditchwater. Now they're releasing an even more dull verson? No thanks.
Anyone that thinks an M5 will be dull, and an M550i will be 'even duller' is either not an enthusiastic driver, foolish, or a mere troll.

PH* whinges about the downsizing of engines, then BMW launch a 450bhp V8 and PH whinges that it isn't M5 enough.


(*and mostly the PHers that could never be in a position to buy a £90k M5, just critiquing it from their £2,500 stboxes.)
I got a private viewing of the new M5 at Zolder a month or so ago; had to hand in my phone in everything due it being so secretive. And for what? It looked like a 520d. I thought the previous gen M5 was muted, but this one is just as bad, if not worse. And it's not like I like wild cars (the GTS, for example, is atrocious), but any enthusiast wants to look back at their car and think "Phwoar."

In the last decade the 3 Series has taken over from the Mondeo and Vectra, whilst the fugly 1 Series competes with lowly hatchbacks. It just makes me wonder how much longer BMW can lean on their reputation of building driver's cars.

I would argue PH whinges more about the fact that manufacturers are ignoring the fact that we want driver's cars, not just 0-60 times. The 550i is a perfect illustration of this; a great car on paper ideal for pub chat, but not a driver's car. Given that is meant to be BMW's USP, that has to be a disappointing.
Phwoar


Yes...that looks so much different from the 520 of its era:


gofasterrosssco

1,238 posts

237 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
E28
520i Slow, Gigantic roll
535i Moderately fast, Gigantic roll
M535i Moderately fast, very high roll, sports interior
M5 fast, moderate roll, sports luxury interior

What has changed with the latest 5 series range? Not much that I can see.
People have donned their rose-tints and have some kind of Mandela-effect moments where they recall cars which were effectively warmed-over standard cars with some add on bits and spec as some form of motorsport-tweaked specials.. Its a 5-Series..

A manufacturers approach to offering progressively warmer models is absolutely not a new thing, so I'm not sure how people think its weird that BMW would stick some branded badges on a 550i..

People sometimes seem to have a 'top down' review where they assess (the M550i in this case) a new model as what it doesn't have in comparison to the top spec model. And maybe some people want an executive estate car that is easy to drive, but has a big engine.

Kawasicki

13,096 posts

236 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
gofasterrosssco said:
People have donned their rose-tints and have some kind of Mandela-effect moments where they recall cars which were effectively warmed-over standard cars with some add on bits and spec as some form of motorsport-tweaked specials.. Its a 5-Series..

A manufacturers approach to offering progressively warmer models is absolutely not a new thing, so I'm not sure how people think its weird that BMW would stick some branded badges on a 550i..

People sometimes seem to have a 'top down' review where they assess (the M550i in this case) a new model as what it doesn't have in comparison to the top spec model. And maybe some people want an executive estate car that is easy to drive, but has a big engine.
Yup...and don't forget the people that criticise the base model, whilst not having the will/opportunity/skill to even scratch the skin of what it is capable of.

mainaman

414 posts

186 months

Friday 29th September 2017
quotequote all
Ares said:
Thats my post, and it isn't apparent. It is closer to a 530d M-Sport that an M5, IMO, having driven both. But it isn't closer to a 520i.

And the M550i isn't targeting the same market as an Alfa QV or M3?
So the 530d M Sport has better driving dynamics than the 520i M Sport(with less weight in the nose)?

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Saturday 30th September 2017
quotequote all
mainaman said:
Ares said:
Thats my post, and it isn't apparent. It is closer to a 530d M-Sport that an M5, IMO, having driven both. But it isn't closer to a 520i.

And the M550i isn't targeting the same market as an Alfa QV or M3?
So the 530d M Sport has better driving dynamics than the 520i M Sport(with less weight in the nose)?
Depends what you mean by dynamics, but yes, the 530d is a far better drive than a 520i. The gearbox operation transforms the car for a start off.

Kawasicki

13,096 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th September 2017
quotequote all
Ares said:
mainaman said:
Ares said:
Thats my post, and it isn't apparent. It is closer to a 530d M-Sport that an M5, IMO, having driven both. But it isn't closer to a 520i.

And the M550i isn't targeting the same market as an Alfa QV or M3?
So the 530d M Sport has better driving dynamics than the 520i M Sport(with less weight in the nose)?
Depends what you mean by dynamics, but yes, the 530d is a far better drive than a 520i. The gearbox operation transforms the car for a start off.
I think he probably means agility, balance, crispness of response. A 520i is probably better than a 530d in those areas.

nickfrog

21,214 posts

218 months

Saturday 30th September 2017
quotequote all
Sten. said:
Agent XXX on holiday? Disappointed. Without his unbiased and beautifully written review I find it difficult to form an opinion on BMWs.
laugh

I am massively disappointed too.

rotate

aaron_2000

5,407 posts

84 months

Saturday 30th September 2017
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
laugh

I am massively disappointed too.

rotate
I wondered why I didn't know what I thought of the M550i xD

matthias73

2,883 posts

151 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
fred bloggs said:
Theyll slap an M badge on anything if it gets a couple more sales. I wouldnt mind betting the dealers have a stash of eBay badges under the counter to stick on when a customer speccs the Msport valve caps.
BMW lost its 'premiumness' after around 2002 and just churn out rubbish that the masses buy because it wears a BMW badge.
I suppose if your a bottom rung rep,an Mbadge on your 320d makes you feel a little bit better about your life.
A new 320d is an incredible car though.

I've had cars from their "premium years" and my pride and joy is an e46 330i vert. It's possibly the highest specced e46 other than an m3 I've seen.

But a new 320d will accelerate almost as quick and achieve 70mpg. Whilst not as involving as my e46 they are pleasant enough to drive, grip very well and are absolutely a premium product, especially on the inside. You compare an e46 or e36 to a brand new 3er and you're looking at phenomenal improvement over twenty years. Just lose the rose glasses and go on auto trader to look at an e36 316ti SE to remember how bad their base models use to be.

Also can confirm that when I was 18 and on minimum wage, buying a 8 year old e46 318 for shed money because it was the sport trim made me feel excellent on the drive home despite how bad my day may have been!


r129sl

9,518 posts

204 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
Message to BMW and Mercedes: please can we have cars with big petrol engines WITHOUT the 'M' and 'AMG' addenda. Surely I am not the only person in the universe who cringes at the mere thought of these "brands". M-Performance and AMG have become like a steroidal Burberry, the very definition of today's Chav.

ZX10R NIN

27,648 posts

126 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
I partially agree with you but for different reasons I don't care who drives what & I'm not calling people whatever name it is this week, for me if you can afford to buy/run it more power to you, but for me AMG/M are supposed to be top of the tree in terms of models but diluting the name so that even the diesels are AMG is pointless & just takes the specialness away from the badge.

For me it's simple they need to make a sub badge in Mercedes case go back to the Sport Line name & BMW could go back to the Sport the trim level & make the M Sport the sub model across the range.

Audi have it right for me with their S/RS models also if AMG want to put their name to a diesel model I'd like them to do it properly. smile

matthias73

2,883 posts

151 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
The msport thing makes sense though.

You buy a 325i which is nice. You then spec it as msport, thus giving it harder suspension, bigger alloys and in some cases brakes, bolstered seats and some badges to show your mates you like going fast around corners.

Or, you don't want the msport but you quite like the seats so you spec them independently.

Or you you're actually a doctor by day but a lunatic by night so you buy the m3 and you don't need m badges because you've got massive vents instead.

It makes the second hand market so easy as well.

theboss

6,924 posts

220 months

Sunday 1st October 2017
quotequote all
Badges don't bother me in the slightest and if I were buying a non-M BMW I'd more than likely buy M Sport trim just because I prefer the styling and suspension setup (as nice as a 550i SE would be!).

As for dilution, the harder it is to distinguish between my M5 and every 520d M Sport out there on the roads, the better as far as I'm concerned. The relative anonymity is half the reason I wanted one.

I know its contradictory to the above, but I do think MB have gone a little too far in plastering AMG on everything they sell, but again that wouldn't bother me in the slightest if I were buying an E63S.

Leins

9,480 posts

149 months

Monday 2nd October 2017
quotequote all
matthias73 said:
But a new 320d will accelerate almost as quick and achieve 70mpg. Whilst not as involving as my e46 they are pleasant enough to drive, grip very well and are absolutely a premium product, especially on the inside. You compare an e46 or e36 to a brand new 3er and you're looking at phenomenal improvement over twenty years. Just lose the rose glasses and go on auto trader to look at an e36 316ti SE to remember how bad their base models use to be.
Not sure I agree myself at the improvement - early E36s had a few build issues, but other than that they are still fine cars with a quality interior today

Nothing wrong with an E36 Compact either IME, well built and good enough fun to drive, albeit not all that quick

(As a pedantic aside, there was no such thing as an E36 316ti, they only used the "ti" branding on the 318 & 323 Compacts)

aaron_2000

5,407 posts

84 months

Monday 2nd October 2017
quotequote all
matthias73 said:
You compare an e46 or e36 to a brand new 3er and you're looking at phenomenal improvement over twenty years.
I'd say the E46 has aged better than most cars of the age. Still a nice interior, feels modern enough with nice materials. I was never an E36 guy, but still aged better than the Merc's of the age.

Etypephil

724 posts

79 months

Monday 2nd October 2017
quotequote all
BMW made some great cars during the 80s and 90s; fast, involving and reliable, but seem to have lost their way in the search for increased market share. Sadly, they are far from alone in this.

mylesmcd

2,535 posts

220 months

Monday 2nd October 2017
quotequote all
Etypephil said:
BMW made some great cars during the 80s and 90s; fast, involving and reliable, but seem to have lost their way in the search for increased market share. Sadly, they are far from alone in this.
Congratulations on the first post.

I also challenge you to drive an M240 or similar. They can still make a damm fine car!

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Monday 2nd October 2017
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Ares said:
mainaman said:
Ares said:
Thats my post, and it isn't apparent. It is closer to a 530d M-Sport that an M5, IMO, having driven both. But it isn't closer to a 520i.

And the M550i isn't targeting the same market as an Alfa QV or M3?
So the 530d M Sport has better driving dynamics than the 520i M Sport(with less weight in the nose)?
Depends what you mean by dynamics, but yes, the 530d is a far better drive than a 520i. The gearbox operation transforms the car for a start off.
I think he probably means agility, balance, crispness of response. A 520i is probably better than a 530d in those areas.
He just said the M550i was 'apparently' closer to an 520i than an M5. He also questioned the 530d having better driving dynamics than the 520i. Having driven both I said it had. There was no perceptible difference in balance or agility. Response was probably better in the 530d, and for driving, the 530d was a lot better. No apparently, just personal experience!