Should we be getting behind Brexit by boycotting German cars

Should we be getting behind Brexit by boycotting German cars

Author
Discussion

SWoll

18,494 posts

259 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
jl34 said:
Killboy said:
I think I'm going to buy a German car. Time to trade in the Vauxhall.
A Vauxhall is a German car (opel)
smile

crankedup

25,764 posts

244 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
I’m thinking about trading in our mini cooper for a 135i this Spring. Not new but I suppose it’s will need consumer parts and replacement parts over the course of our ownership. Because we are no longer in the EU makes not a jot of difference to my buying choices. Life’s to short.

Ahonen

5,018 posts

280 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
jl34 said:
Killboy said:
I think I'm going to buy a German car. Time to trade in the Vauxhall.
A Vauxhall is a German car (opel)
French actually. PSA.

Bodo

12,379 posts

267 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
jl34 said:
Killboy said:
I think I'm going to buy a German car. Time to trade in the Vauxhall.
A Vauxhall is a German car (opel)
French actually. PSA.
From January 16, 2021 it will be Stellantis, headquartered in Amsterdam.

To make that short, Killboy's Astra was likely assembled in Ellesmere Port, and the OP's Insignia in Rüsselsheim.

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
In 1975 there was no way the people of the UK were even going to understand what being in an EU would mean, let alone make an informed vote on the matter...
Same as in 2016 then?
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975

Sahjahd

420 posts

46 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975
On both occasions there was a concerted government effort to persuade the people to vote remain. In 1975 people still largely trusted government, by 2016, most were much wiser towards establishment motivations, as well as having the benefit of hindsight.

Killboy

7,422 posts

203 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Bodo said:
Ahonen said:
jl34 said:
Killboy said:
I think I'm going to buy a German car. Time to trade in the Vauxhall.
A Vauxhall is a German car (opel)
French actually. PSA.
From January 16, 2021 it will be Stellantis, headquartered in Amsterdam.

To make that short, Killboy's Astra was likely assembled in Ellesmere Port, and the OP's Insignia in Rüsselsheim.
Yup. Still, can’t really find anything I like that isn’t German.


Prof Prolapse

16,160 posts

191 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Prof Prolapse said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
In 1975 there was no way the people of the UK were even going to understand what being in an EU would mean, let alone make an informed vote on the matter...
Same as in 2016 then?
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975
I'd argue the international relationships in 2016 are vastly more complicated than they were in 1975. I'd also say that, whilst there is a vast amount of information out there, self-directed learning is a skill very few possess, or have time for. It's self-evident most did not take the time to research, and the public were not given a balanced and impartial information to make their decision. Polling has been very clear it was a "decision of the heart", so to speak.

"More informed than in 1975", does not mean, "sufficiently informed".

That having been said, I accept the outcome of the vote, so no need for to endlessly rehash old arguments or fall out over it. So the question goes back to how do benefit from our situation, as I have no doubt there are opportunities out there.

Back on topic, "boycotting" of any product on the described basis, strikes me as the market forces equivalent of a child holding their breath until they turn blue, and I believe will result in the same amount of respect from the international stage.
















Killboy

7,422 posts

203 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975
Yeah, look at how well informed people are about vaccinations.

HM-2

12,467 posts

170 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
"More informed than in 1975", does not mean, "sufficiently informed".
I would also draw a distinction between "more available information" and "more informed."
Just because more information is available doesn't mean that voters are ingesting it. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that, in terms of actually understanding the roles, function and structure of European institutions, the average voter in 1975 knew a great deal more than the average voter in 2016. Some of that is to do with the decades of added complexity within the institution, but wilful ignorance also plays a significant part.

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Killboy said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975
Yeah, look at how well informed people are about vaccinations.
So are you saying that no matter how informed, or under informed the people are, they will always make more or less the same sort of decision, and consequently there is no point in informing them on any matters?

ddom

6,657 posts

49 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
So are you saying that no matter how informed, or under informed the people are, they will always make more or less the same sort of decision, and consequently there is no point in informing them on any matters?
Well when the some, when armed with all this media believes;

1. Boycotting German cars would be a thing
2. We actually really are saving £350M per week

I can't see the point of any more information biggrin

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
HM-2 said:
Prof Prolapse said:
"More informed than in 1975", does not mean, "sufficiently informed".
I would also draw a distinction between "more available information" and "more informed."
Just because more information is available doesn't mean that voters are ingesting it. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that, in terms of actually understanding the roles, function and structure of European institutions, the average voter in 1975 knew a great deal more than the average voter in 2016. Some of that is to do with the decades of added complexity within the institution, but wilful ignorance also plays a significant part.
That would be your opinion, like other`s opinions including mine, it would not necessarily be correct.

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
ddom said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
So are you saying that no matter how informed, or under informed the people are, they will always make more or less the same sort of decision, and consequently there is no point in informing them on any matters?
Well when the some, when armed with all this media believes;

1. Boycotting German cars would be a thing
2. We actually really are saving £350M per week

I can't see the point of any more information biggrin
Especially not now, It will be years before anyone, or any institution, can make an informed, and objective opinion on whether or not leaving the EU was good / bad for the UK / EU.

HM-2

12,467 posts

170 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
That would be your opinion, like other`s opinions including mine, it would not necessarily be correct.
Levels of political engagement across the board in 1975 were far higher than they are in 2016. Sadly there's not a great deal of data around political knowledge specifically, though.

Magnum 475

3,557 posts

133 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Not really, In 2016 the people of the UK had multiple TV news channels, Multiple news papers, the internet, and over 40 years of actual experience of what being in an EU meant for the UK and its people on which to base their vote, In 1975 there were only 4 TV channels, a few tabloid / /broadsheet news papers, and no internet.
It would seem the information available in 2016, on which to base a vote, on either remaining or leaving the EU was vastly greater, than what was available to the public in 1975. making the 2016 vote vastly more informed, accurate and reliable than the one in 1975
Of course, what we actually had in 2016 was multiple routes for certain less scrupulous campaign organizations to spread their lies more easily. This certainly did not equate to a better informed electorate. Need I remind everyone of the roles played by Cambridge Analytica and Aggregate IQ??

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
ddom said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
So are you saying that no matter how informed, or under informed the people are, they will always make more or less the same sort of decision, and consequently there is no point in informing them on any matters?
Well when the some, when armed with all this media believes;

1. Boycotting German cars would be a thing
2. We actually really are saving £350M per week

I can't see the point of any more information biggrin
smile

I was going to buy a Bosch dishwasher but saw this thread and decided I would just get the kids to do it instead. Now who's the winner?!

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
HM-2 said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
That would be your opinion, like other`s opinions including mine, it would not necessarily be correct.
Levels of political engagement across the board in 1975 were far higher than they are in 2016. Sadly there's not a great deal of data around political knowledge specifically, though.
I regret I cannot agree, because to me it seems people are far more engaged with politics now than they ever were in 1975.
As has been pointed out by others, people were far more trusting of governments back then, than the very cynical view that most people take of government actions these days. Not least with watching almost continuous TV screening of business in the HoC, and Ho:L, and not forgetting the various court actions brought by individuals against government policy. Something that would only rarely, if ever have taken place in 1975. But as you pointed out posted before, we have our opinions, with not much if anything, to prove which are the most accurate.

HM-2

12,467 posts

170 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
I regret I cannot agree, because to me it seems people are far more engaged with politics now than they ever were in 1975.
In 1975 most voters knew not only who their local MP was, but their specific views on a variety of subjects. 78% of current voters can't even name their local MP. The same is true of members of the cabinet; we might be bombarded with coverage of parliament on a routine basis but it hasn't resulted in the general public having more understanding of who leads which cabinet department and what their remit is.

Pan Pan Pan

9,956 posts

112 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
HM-2 said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
I regret I cannot agree, because to me it seems people are far more engaged with politics now than they ever were in 1975.
In 1975 most voters knew not only who their local MP was, but their specific views on a variety of subjects. 78% of current voters can't even name their local MP. The same is true of members of the cabinet; we might be bombarded with coverage of parliament on a routine basis but it hasn't resulted in the general public having more understanding of who leads which cabinet department and what their remit is.
We shall just have to agree to disagree.