RE: Aston Martin Vantage: Lift off

RE: Aston Martin Vantage: Lift off

Author
Discussion

spice

632 posts

271 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
DESIGNER SPECIFICATIONS
ENGINE
314mph
Top Speed
3.6s
0-62 mph
503PS
Power
314 MPH

akirk

5,394 posts

115 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
nickwilcock said:
Butt-ugly styling, particularly the nose. Ridiculous blingtastic interior.

It seems that Aston have stopped making cars with discrete elegance and style.

What a great pity.
I don't think that there is money in making cars for the more gentlemanly tastes of subtlety, elegance and style - those who have money and are prepared to spend it on expensive metal from mainstream manufacturers seem to prefer a certain amount of bling... those who are prepared to spend money and want subtlety will go for something a little more bespoke - perhaps the Singers / Eagles of this world...

Car looks okay, but would agree that it is no longer a gentleman's car...

SFO

5,169 posts

184 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
front looks wrong to my eyes .. like a face with huge mouth and no chin

MX5 much better resolved!

kambites

67,586 posts

222 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Hmm, the proportions are lovely and the back end works but the strange creases feeding into the vent on the flanks look messy and the nose is awful.

herebebeasties

671 posts

220 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Actually looks pretty brilliant in studio lighting in red IMO - Carfection vid here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqFb0ssFM1o (also with a suggestion there will be a manual - hurrah!).

swisstoni

17,030 posts

280 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Can quibble over some bits but it's basically fantastic.
Has it's own character and doesn't look like a junior DB11. I'm afraid the previous Vantage suffer a bit from that IMHO.

Al U

2,313 posts

132 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
The center console is like a game of "how many squares can you see in this image" but instead of squares, buttons.

I count 32 not including the touch screen.

Edited by Al U on Tuesday 21st November 13:41

TrickyTrevM5

297 posts

187 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all


Who let the designer of mid-ranking renaults from the noughties design the interior?

Exterior works for me, seats etc can be specced to taste but the dash architecture is a mess - i really hope the air vent surrounds are made of aluminium or stainless steel not the faux-steel from the aformentioned mid-naughties Renault

The issue with the dash is it looks poor today, will look dreadful in 10 -15 years - and what ever you say about the outgoing car, the classic looks and interior have aged gracefully.

RLCCM

18 posts

170 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
My god that front is FUGLY!

Love the back, just wish the front didn't look like Carp. And people said the new TVR looks bad... sorry but the front of this is a shocker!

jwwbowe

577 posts

173 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Wow love that! Think they have nailed the styling, which can't of been a easy task as its predecessor was/is arguably the best looking modern Aston. Not convinced on the centre console but who cares, it'll look much better when they put a manual gearstick in it.

£120k seems a lot to me, but then we live in a world of £35k vw golfs and Porsches with option lists longer than the yellow pages so I guess it is all relevant!

Role on another V12 Vantage. I'll take one in green with a manual gearbox please smile Also need Santa to put winning Lotto numbers in my stocking, but hey we can dream!

Dr Interceptor

7,799 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
My apologies, Ph'ers, you are about to lose all your afternoons productivity.

There is a configurator live.... Https://configurator.astonmartin.com/#/AM600


willisit

2,142 posts

232 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Yes please.

£121k (I guess, plus options) is strong. It's a clear step up (though not a "pretty"), but I'd have thought it'd come in under £100k. Oh well, a 1st world problem I don't have to worry about.

R33FAL

535 posts

169 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
MX-6 Front and Renault Laguna (coupe) back.




Ed Straker

221 posts

144 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Personally, I would have just made the DB10 with a V8 in it - perfection.
But i still think it looks great.
Interior on the green one the way to go.....

E65Ross

35,099 posts

213 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
PHMatt said:
This is not so much a criticism, more an observation.....

I find it very hard to put any generation of Astons into a hierarchical line up.

As it stands, it looks quite clear that this will sit below the DB11 even though they have the same engine.

But what happens when Aston get itchy and stick a V12 in this and it goes faster and costs more than a base level DB11? (IE v12 Vantage and DB9)

I couldn't imagine BMW putting a V12 into an M4 to make it more epic than a V8 M6 for example
Probably no different to when the V12V went quicker than the old DB9, I'd imagine.

Bublik22

3 posts

80 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
Beautiful - but a ZF auto box? frown
Why? 'cos its CHEAP I guess.... but this car is £120k
I wish Aston, Jaguar etc would find a dual clutch 'box from somewhere.....
My wife drives a 7 seater Touran which makes my Jaguar XF with ZF feel 70 years old in comparison...

Dr Interceptor

7,799 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
PHMatt said:
This is not so much a criticism, more an observation.....

I find it very hard to put any generation of Astons into a hierarchical line up.

As it stands, it looks quite clear that this will sit below the DB11 even though they have the same engine.

But what happens when Aston get itchy and stick a V12 in this and it goes faster and costs more than a base level DB11? (IE v12 Vantage and DB9)

I couldn't imagine BMW putting a V12 into an M4 to make it more epic than a V8 M6 for example
Some manufacturers worry about this, Porsche for example by not letting the Cayman get near a 911. But then the Cayman is very close to a 911.

It doesn't seem to bother Aston, and nor should it. If they fit a V12 in the Vantage, and it runs rings round their big GT car, it doesn't matter. They are different cars in different segments

Chris Stott

13,389 posts

198 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
I was someone who didn't 'get' the DB11 until I saw one in the flesh, and in the right colour.

I spent the weekend at my BIL's, and the more I gaze at his DB11, the more beautiful angles and shapes I find. Out of the showroom, and in the right colour, it's a truly fabulous shape. And it's much smaller in the flesh than it looks in pictures.



Now I've had more time to digest, I'm starting to understand the new design language for AM... and I think it modernises the brand in a way sticking spoilers/vents/wings on the classic shape really couldn't. This makes the current V8V look positively ancient.

But again, this is a very colour sensitive shape. I saw the lime green car and immediately disliked it. Then I saw a video on YT of a red car with gloss black trim and it looked fabulous.

The interior looks like it's been lifted from a Merc GTS... which isn't a criticism!

Pekwah1

74 posts

182 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
is it me or does the front look vaguely like the new mx5......

kambites

67,586 posts

222 months

Tuesday 21st November 2017
quotequote all
yes Regardless of engines, they wont really compete with each other. One is a 2+2 GT the other is a two-seater sports/GT hybrid type thing.