RE: New McLaren Senna revealed

RE: New McLaren Senna revealed

Author
Discussion

David87

6,659 posts

213 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Blimey, what a mess. rofl

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
I think people buying £750k cars aren’t sad that often.
This being one of them though.

AlexHat

1,327 posts

120 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Chaps, you have got to think like a billionaire, not a millionaire...you already have all the pretty HyperCars cars, it really doesn't matter what it looks like, this is your track car, for turning up a Spa, with a full support team and racing driver and then being about able to exploit 7/10th of the permanent and wipe the floor with everything else (10/10ths is for the racing driver when you are a passenger)...this is not your only car you trailer to Brans Hatch behind your jeep Cherokee...
If I had multi millions to spend on a track car, this wouldn't be it. To me it looks like a 720s that has been sent to Mansory to make it look 'better', though the rear wing is straight out of a Forza game

patmahe

5,752 posts

205 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
McLaren are not stupid, though Honda deals in F1 and calling this car Senna might lead you to think otherwise.

This car is about one thing, speed. It needs to not only beat, but destroy everything else that is road legal. They have to be confident it can do that. 800 bhp in a car that weighs less than 1200kg and employs every aerodynamic trick McLaren knows is going to be damn quick and when it is it won't matter how it looks.

All that said, I think it was a mistake calling this car Senna.

givablondabone

5,508 posts

156 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Name aside for a moment I like it. It looks like it does for a single minded purpose although I accept others have done similar with better aesthetic results.

What I don't like is this seemingly conveyor belt approach to churning out one ltd edition after the next resulting in, for me at least, blurred lines between each 'new' model.

It's particularly poignant with Mclaren I think because the basic car/tub, all look the same to me and it's only the various addenda that distinguishes one model from another.

I also agree that they really need a new, halo engine (V10/12) in order to step up to the next level. They've really caned that V8 now.

subirg

718 posts

277 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Chaps, you have got to think like a billionaire, not a millionaire...you already have all the pretty HyperCars cars, it really doesn't matter what it looks like, this is your track car, for turning up a Spa, with a full support team and racing driver and then being about able to exploit 7/10th of the permanent and wipe the floor with everything else (10/10ths is for the racing driver when you are a passenger)...this is not your only car you trailer to Brans Hatch behind your jeep Cherokee...
Wrong. A billionaire will take a merc project 1 or Aston Valkyrie or Ferrari fxxk EVO etc before being seen dead in this hound of a thing.

Ninja59

3,691 posts

113 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
How is faster around ‘nearly every’ track than a P1 a step backwards

Pure futuristic tech wise maybe but this is about going fast. I’m guessing it was styled purely by aerodynamics which is why it looks so fking bad laugh
Because technically it is...it is ICE only...

E65Ross

35,092 posts

213 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
subirg said:
Itsallicanafford said:
Chaps, you have got to think like a billionaire, not a millionaire...you already have all the pretty HyperCars cars, it really doesn't matter what it looks like, this is your track car, for turning up a Spa, with a full support team and racing driver and then being about able to exploit 7/10th of the permanent and wipe the floor with everything else (10/10ths is for the racing driver when you are a passenger)...this is not your only car you trailer to Brans Hatch behind your jeep Cherokee...
Wrong. A billionaire will take a merc project 1 or Aston Valkyrie or Ferrari fxxk EVO etc before being seen dead in this hound of a thing.
Whilst I totally agree it's fking ugly....you're comment is saying that it simply won't sell? Pretty sure they'll sell out.

NotNormal

2,359 posts

215 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Bruno must be happy with a car named after him, judging by the looks though I expect they gave him the pencil to design it too hurl

Esceptico

7,503 posts

110 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Um. Interesting styling. Still, if they have sold them all I doubt that McLaren will be too worried about the negative opinion of those that were never going to be able to buy one.

Not sure of the point of such cars. Compromised as a road car yet at the same time, unlikely to be as quick or fun as something built only for track use.

Dan-Gold

5 posts

177 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
The over head start button is straight from the book of boyhood dreams.

98elise

26,643 posts

162 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Chaps, you have got to think like a billionaire, not a millionaire...you already have all the pretty HyperCars cars, it really doesn't matter what it looks like, this is your track car, for turning up a Spa, with a full support team and racing driver and then being about able to exploit 7/10th of the permanent and wipe the floor with everything else (10/10ths is for the racing driver when you are a passenger)...this is not your only car you trailer to Brans Hatch behind your jeep Cherokee...
How many billionaires actually drive on tracks?


CoolHands

18,668 posts

196 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Wow that wing looks silly

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Same old bark about tub/engine. This model's USP is that it was modelled on Steve Buscemi.

Yawn.

The Hypno-Toad

12,284 posts

206 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
Dan-Gold said:
The over head start button is straight from the book of boyhood dreams.
I never know I wanted one of those...

But now I need one so bad...

Murphy16

254 posts

83 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
jcl said:
All the zero taste Arab and Chinese billionaires have a lot to answer for.
+1

SturdyHSV

10,098 posts

168 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
samoht said:
Side profile view from Autocar:

I just don't understand the shape of the car. I mean, the 720S already had a ridiculous beak on it, but this is even more insane. They've taken the cab forward stance of a mid engined car, but then also got the long front end of a front engined car.

It looks like the body has driven ahead of the wheels, it's like when someone cobbles a Ferrari kit on an MX5 or a Cobra kit on a Z3 or something. The wheelbase is just wrong for the body?!

ZX10R NIN

27,628 posts

126 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
This car is form over function it ain't pretty but I bet it'll be bloody effective in that way it's very much like the Gumpert Apollo.

dank

1,154 posts

253 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
What's going on with car design, TVR Griffith and now this from Mclaren.... utter turd

smilo996

2,795 posts

171 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
McLaren's peperami - a bit of an animal. One of those cars you could look at for a very long time. A lot to like.

Still, the pinnacle of McLaren's return will be the BP23.