RE: Ford teases its most powerful road car ever

RE: Ford teases its most powerful road car ever

Author
Discussion

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
With a scamera-enforced 40mph limit? Yeah right!
Never been on that A96 tbh jester

They're currently covering the A90 in average speed cameras though!

catsey

266 posts

78 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
live axle and 550bhp on a 2012 shelby was a handful what you mean by shelby owners . I will state that the mustang 8* i had in that shelby was better than any German V8 that engine was a dream and long may the Septics keep on producing high H.P. end cars

skyrover

12,671 posts

204 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Would make a nice engine in the next ford transit smile

saxy

258 posts

124 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
I do agree with much of the comments up front. Although a muscle car with lots of power had its place in history, it’s pretty much pointless now. People will care it’s a mustang and not much more. And about drag racing, there’s no way in hell this could keep up with a fast Tesla. The argument of a supercar is that not only is it fast, it’s brilliant in the corners, and everything. This, is much more like a one trick pony like the Tesla. The GT350R is a much cooler car

Dr G

15,175 posts

242 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
saxy said:
And about drag racing, there’s no way in hell this could keep up with a fast Tesla.
As a decent comparison:

Charger Hellcat 11.2 @ 125
P100D 10.8 @ 124

Both cars have gone quicker with mild tweaking but that's a different discussion. Given that you could (more or less) by two Hellcats for the price of the Tesla I think I'll allow the ~0.4 to be called 'keeping up'.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
saxy said:
The argument of a supercar is that not only is it fast, it’s brilliant in the corners, and everything.
You're wrong about that - the point of a supercar (or in fact any car designed for fun) is to make the owner (and other car enthusiasts to a certain degree) feel like a little kid on Christmas morning, to make you grin and enjoy the process of driving it, the sounds it makes, how it reacts to you etc...

It's not about absolute numbers, or what is 0.5 seconds faster around a track, or where and when you can deploy 700bhp for more than a few seconds , or any of that stuff.

If you fail to understand that , you'll never see the point in a car like this.

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Dunno what the fuss is. M5's and E63's are similarly fast (or likely faster) but you don't see people crying about them. Some very boring people on here.

lee_erm

1,091 posts

193 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Good morning Mumsnet.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
redroadster said:
Negative comments think some should be on knitting world's forum
Are negative comments sentient?

HappyMidget

6,788 posts

115 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Not personally a fan of the Mustang, but good on Ford for making this. Having a powerful pd supercharged car is great fun and only being able to deploy full power through the gears once a year on a runway is not an issue smile

0-179 in a pointless 838BHP family saloon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i2WAadeoWY

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
The 650hp Camaro ZL1 is already available and lighter and better handling and with a Nurburgring time the Mustang is probably unlikely to challenge.
You should pop that in a letter to Ford to stop them developing it. They'll be relieved at the cost saving.

Or maybe your statements were totally unfounded with no basis for comparison. Who knows.

AppleJuice

2,154 posts

85 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
HedgeyGedgey said:
Is it 700bhp US power which is probably more like 500bhp over here, or is it actualyl 700bhp in the UK?
I'm presuming you mean SAE v DIN?

I'd presume it'd be 700 bhp SAE which roughly equates to 710 PS DIN.

markclow

118 posts

131 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Much rather have the gt350 than this pig.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Love it, could easily make this RHD if you wanted to now that you can get the lesser Mustangs in RHD.

Might P/X my Mustang for one, I wonder how long I'd keep my license?

sumpoil

431 posts

164 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Coin Slot. said:
Love it, could easily make this RHD if you wanted to now that you can get the lesser Mustangs in RHD.

Might P/X my Mustang for one, I wonder how long I'd keep my license?
Sadly, much like the GT350, I don't think it's scheduled for anywhere outside the US. I REALLY REALLY REALLY wanted a GT350R (and would still prefer one to a GT500) but it looks like 2018 will be the final year for the GT350 so my hopes for a RHD version seem to have been dashed. I can only imagine it will be the same for the GT500 - it seems Ford don't want to go to the expense of Euro emissions, crash testing etc for limited run models.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
sumpoil said:
Sadly, much like the GT350, I don't think it's scheduled for anywhere outside the US. I REALLY REALLY REALLY wanted a GT350R (and would still prefer one to a GT500) but it looks like 2018 will be the final year for the GT350 so my hopes for a RHD version seem to have been dashed. I can only imagine it will be the same for the GT500 - it seems Ford don't want to go to the expense of Euro emissions, crash testing etc for limited run models.
Sorry, I meant an independent could easily convert one to RHD.

sumpoil

431 posts

164 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Coin Slot. said:
Sorry, I meant an independent could easily convert one to RHD.
Yep, I guess they could - not sure how the 5.2L S/C installation differs from the regular Coyote but I would imagine that would be the only major issue. Just a shame they don't come in RHD in the first place! .... confused

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Awesome. This is the power it should have to compete with the Dodge etc. Quite the beast but obviously not for the fuddy duddy grandad somewhere above.

I was at the autosport show last week and they had a couole of very nice mustangs, I looked at it and thought "yep, love that, I'd buy one if they made a smaller shrunk down version" it's very nice but just a bit big for my liking.


techguyone

3,137 posts

142 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
HedgeyGedgey said:
Is it 700bhp US power which is probably more like 500bhp over here, or is it actualyl 700bhp in the UK?
I think their power measurements are similar to ours it's their Gallons which are quite a bit less than ours for no other reason I can see except they wanted to be different. And if you're not used to it, you think their mpg is more rubbish than it really is.

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Wednesday 17th January 2018
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
You should pop that in a letter to Ford to stop them developing it. They'll be relieved at the cost saving.

Or maybe your statements were totally unfounded with no basis for comparison. Who knows.
It's all about halo models but GM and Dodge have already been there but only GM seem serious about making a ridiculously fast car.
I am sure Ford will aslo stick a "Shelby" badge on it, despite no actual input.

Or... you could read the glowing road tests, I suppose and look at the 'Ring times, I suppose....
7:13.90 Chevrolet Corvette C7 Z06
7:16.04 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE (2018)
that's 2 seconds faster than the 911 GT2 and GT3.

Seems a fairly founded basis to me. After all, Ford did their best with the over-hyped GT350R so let's see if they can do better this time.