RE: Mazda 6 MPS: Spotted

RE: Mazda 6 MPS: Spotted

Author
Discussion

Fastdruid

8,643 posts

152 months

Wednesday 31st January 2018
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
Fastdruid said:
Struggling to think of anything to replace it with that is as quick but equally decent to drive while also being practical.
Forester STi (or modified XT) or Impreza wagon seem the obvious choices
Forester? It's a compact crossover SUV ffs.

Impreza is off the list due to image problems. Which is somewhat of a shame as on paper it does seem a fairly obvious choice.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 31st January 2018
quotequote all
exgtt said:
dme123 said:
So rust prone, fragile, expensive and frequent servicing, all for BMW 330d performance and a four pot soundtrack.

PH sure does know how to pick a winner.
Could say the same about a standard Sapphire Cosworth....
Yes but to some that car is an icon, and nostalgia is a powerful force. This was always just *shrug*

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,375 posts

98 months

Wednesday 31st January 2018
quotequote all
Tax at over £500 look like a value killer but some examples are so cheap I’d consider having one untaxed and just using it off the public highway, Jap rally car minus the unfortunate image really appeals to me.

Fastdruid

8,643 posts

152 months

Wednesday 31st January 2018
quotequote all
A few are before the 2006 hike. Ours is 2005 registered for example.

GravelBen

15,686 posts

230 months

Wednesday 31st January 2018
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
Struggling to think of anything to replace it with that is as quick but equally decent to drive while also being practical.
Legacy GT is the obvious answer, but I guess would have to be a JDM import for you in the UK. Legacy 3.0R not far off for pace either though.

Fastdruid

8,643 posts

152 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
Fastdruid said:
Struggling to think of anything to replace it with that is as quick but equally decent to drive while also being practical.
Legacy GT is the obvious answer, but I guess would have to be a JDM import for you in the UK. Legacy 3.0R not far off for pace either though.
Isn't that only up to 2009 though and not really significantly newer (as well as less power, slower and worse on tax). I should add that it doesn't have to be *massively* practical as we have a Mondeo Estate for properly practical duties.

Edited by Fastdruid on Thursday 1st February 00:22

IntriguedUser

989 posts

121 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Love the look, however I've heard horror stories regarding these engines being weak, some say not to apply full throttle below 3500 rpm? Not for me.

Also the powerband seems quite weird, diesel like if you will, more so than other petrol turbos.

ericmcn

1,999 posts

97 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
~
GravelBen said:
Legacy GT is the obvious answer, but I guess would have to be a JDM import for you in the UK. Legacy 3.0R not far off for pace either though.
Legacy SpecB even more rare than this model, get a remap on that and you will shock a few motorists, 0-60 on both cars is ~6.4s (without maps obv)

Fastdruid

8,643 posts

152 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
IntriguedUser said:
Love the look, however I've heard horror stories regarding these engines being weak, some say not to apply full throttle below 3500 rpm? Not for me.
Certainly some people say that. I've not restrained myself like that though. Ours is stock however.

IntriguedUser said:
Also the powerband seems quite weird, diesel like if you will, more so than other petrol turbos.
Er, no. Utterly nothing like a diesel.

It's more like an old school turbo though in that there is a bit of lag. Not enough to ever be a problem but enough so you know it's turbo charged.

GravelBen

15,686 posts

230 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
GravelBen said:
Fastdruid said:
Struggling to think of anything to replace it with that is as quick but equally decent to drive while also being practical.
Legacy GT is the obvious answer, but I guess would have to be a JDM import for you in the UK. Legacy 3.0R not far off for pace either though.
Isn't that only up to 2009 though and not really significantly newer (as well as less power, slower and worse on tax). I should add that it doesn't have to be *massively* practical as we have a Mondeo Estate for properly practical duties.
They make a 3.6 NA H6 Legacy now, and maybe a 2.5 turbo for some markets. Up to 2009 they were making Legacies with the 2.0 turbo (twinscroll) as well as the 2.5 turbo depending on markets. 280bhp manual, 260bhp auto.

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

172 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
A friend had one of these, I thought it was quite nice but prefer the Volvo S60R in every way.

rastapasta

1,863 posts

138 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
Fastdruid said:
GravelBen said:
Fastdruid said:
Struggling to think of anything to replace it with that is as quick but equally decent to drive while also being practical.
Legacy GT is the obvious answer, but I guess would have to be a JDM import for you in the UK. Legacy 3.0R not far off for pace either though.
Isn't that only up to 2009 though and not really significantly newer (as well as less power, slower and worse on tax). I should add that it doesn't have to be *massively* practical as we have a Mondeo Estate for properly practical duties.
They make a 3.6 NA H6 Legacy now, and maybe a 2.5 turbo for some markets. Up to 2009 they were making Legacies with the 2.0 turbo (twinscroll) as well as the 2.5 turbo depending on markets. 280bhp manual, 260bhp auto.
Yeah this is correct. I have a 2014 2.5 GT Legacy. Its the nuts. Although (living in Switzerland in a Green canton) Im now being penalized in the roadtax over other cars as mine is a CAT G on their emissions scale.

TheAngryDog

12,406 posts

209 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
dme123 said:
exgtt said:
dme123 said:
So rust prone, fragile, expensive and frequent servicing, all for BMW 330d performance and a four pot soundtrack.

PH sure does know how to pick a winner.
Could say the same about a standard Sapphire Cosworth....
Yes but to some that car is an icon, and nostalgia is a powerful force. This was always just *shrug*
What's a standard Sapphire Cosworth? Do they even exist these days? Totally different era of car, more character and a million times better than the mps. I'd have another Cossie tomorrow, the Mazda I'd really have to think about. I didn't get on with mine and sold it after 3 months.

Fastdruid said:
IntriguedUser said:
Love the look, however I've heard horror stories regarding these engines being weak, some say not to apply full throttle below 3500 rpm? Not for me.
Certainly some people say that. I've not restrained myself like that though. Ours is stock however.

IntriguedUser said:
Also the powerband seems quite weird, diesel like if you will, more so than other petrol turbos.
Er, no. Utterly nothing like a diesel.

It's more like an old school turbo though in that there is a bit of lag. Not enough to ever be a problem but enough so you know it's turbo charged.
I was told not to go full throttle below 3500 by several people, and to build the throttle in when in higher gears at lower rpm. Standard ones seem to be the worse for this and modified ones seem to take it a little better.



Bladedancer

1,269 posts

196 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
Forester STi (or modified XT) or Impreza wagon seem the obvious choices
Legacy Turbo might be a better choice, having EJ20 as opposed to EJ25 in the Forester STI.
Failing that 3.0 Spec B as someone pointed already, just don't buy the auto.

Gotcha2

22 posts

160 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Honestly, I am surprised by some of the responses here. The engine won the wards best engine design for many years, one of if not the first direct injection turbo with variable valve timing and the basis of the current Ecoboost range, they do run out of puff at the top end unless you help them breath but that is pretty standard for most turbo cars.

The chassis is a stiffened and balanced Mazda 6 / Mondeo, so already starting from a high point for a big saloon, but with a trick 4WD system and two mechanical diffs. Its not a caterham but contemporary reviews at the time compared it favorably to the Spec D scoobs and that was with the power deficit - a remap makes it a different animal entirely.

As to reliability and having to drive around things, if tuned badly (some bad maps out there) and you use cheap oil then yes they will go pop but I have run many 5-10yr old performance cars and by comparison my 6yrs with the MPS was easy and cheap. Use 98 RON+, change the oil every year and camchains every 4yrs and it should be reliable. I never worried about using full throttle from any revs or gears and mine got to 135k and 11yrs before it went pop.

I'll get off my soapbox in a moment but one last point, the NVH, material quality and build make it feel much more like an Audi than a jap box, jumping into a scoob really does feel like stepping back in time, horses for courses but its a notable difference.

TheAngryDog

12,406 posts

209 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Gotcha2 said:
Honestly, I am surprised by some of the responses here. The engine won the wards best engine design for many years, one of if not the first direct injection turbo with variable valve timing and the basis of the current Ecoboost range, they do run out of puff at the top end unless you help them breath but that is pretty standard for most turbo cars.

The chassis is a stiffened and balanced Mazda 6 / Mondeo, so already starting from a high point for a big saloon, but with a trick 4WD system and two mechanical diffs. Its not a caterham but contemporary reviews at the time compared it favorably to the Spec D scoobs and that was with the power deficit - a remap makes it a different animal entirely.

As to reliability and having to drive around things, if tuned badly (some bad maps out there) and you use cheap oil then yes they will go pop but I have run many 5-10yr old performance cars and by comparison my 6yrs with the MPS was easy and cheap. Use 98 RON+, change the oil every year and camchains every 4yrs and it should be reliable. I never worried about using full throttle from any revs or gears and mine got to 135k and 11yrs before it went pop.

I'll get off my soapbox in a moment but one last point, the NVH, material quality and build make it feel much more like an Audi than a jap box, jumping into a scoob really does feel like stepping back in time, horses for courses but its a notable difference.
If you're not a member of the Facebook group then you'd see that pretty much 1 goes pop a week just about.

Oh, and 2 seconds to 60mph quicker with a remap? lol. They do the 60 sprint in around 5.5 seconds as it is, so 3.5 seconds to 60? The new junior supercar!

Torcars

8,073 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Is this engine the 2.3 DISI?

If so, its the same motor that's in my CX-7, and am I right in thinking the transmission is similar too?

If not, no need to read on.

If so, all these horror stories are news to me. We've had the car for 11 years from new. It needed a new Turbo after a few months, but since then it has been utterly reliable.

We kept it as our main car much longer than usual because we loved it. Its still in the family and proving to be brisk, reliable transport.

Apart from the turbo, nothing has gone wrong in 11 years. Suspension issues have been down to abuse - a crash.

No rust.

Its not going to be replaced until it dies.

fido

16,797 posts

255 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Torcars said:
If so, its the same motor that's in my CX-7, and am I right in thinking the transmission is similar too?
They are super 4x4s - even if they don't look like one. My uncle has had one for yonks - new Turbo and regular oil changes but otherwise low maintenance. I'm going to take it off him as when he replaces it with a CX-3.

TheAngryDog

12,406 posts

209 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Torcars said:
Is this engine the 2.3 DISI?

If so, its the same motor that's in my CX-7, and am I right in thinking the transmission is similar too?

If not, no need to read on.

If so, all these horror stories are news to me. We've had the car for 11 years from new. It needed a new Turbo after a few months, but since then it has been utterly reliable.

We kept it as our main car much longer than usual because we loved it. Its still in the family and proving to be brisk, reliable transport.

Apart from the turbo, nothing has gone wrong in 11 years. Suspension issues have been down to abuse - a crash.

No rust.

Its not going to be replaced until it dies.
Go on the mps pages on facebook, you will see plenty of them.

A mate of mine has just moved all of another owners engine etc from one MPs (that was rotten, jack went through the body iirc) into a less rusty one. His own car he has had to build two engines for (currently awaiting time to build the second).

I'd only ever have one as a second car now and tbh they aren't special enough to have as a second car.

Fastdruid

8,643 posts

152 months

Thursday 1st February 2018
quotequote all
Torcars said:
Is this engine the 2.3 DISI?

If so, its the same motor that's in my CX-7, and am I right in thinking the transmission is similar too?
Yep. Almost identical. Things like the electronically controlled centre clutch are slightly different for example but I think that's more a case of ongoing updates.