RE: McLaren Senna - full details

RE: McLaren Senna - full details

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Maldini35 said:
... I know a lot of customers who love the look of the car and plenty more who desperately want one...
Do you work for McLaren?

ForZiE23

194 posts

95 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Yet another nice creation from McLaren, love the colour scheme on the photoshoot pictures

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
The Surveyor said:
The key with the Senna will be the driving experience.

Admittedly, most of the people who take delivery will never get anywhere near the performance potential, but that applies to pretty much every performance car sold.

If the feedback from respected journalists and drivers who are allowed to properly wring the neck of the thing is that it's performance positives exceeds its aesthetic negatives it will be a PR success for McLaren. Given the claims with regard to the grip levels being generated, it's all looking very promising.
Yep, so supercars have effectively gone the same way as high end art!

The purchaser gets the majority of satisfaction of ownership from the knowledge that they spent a great deal of money and that critics and other tastemakers agree that the object is worthy of adulation.
The way it's always been. How many times do you think Ralph Lauren has 'v-maxed' his F1 GTR for example and if the answer is 'never' does it make the car any less desirable?

E65Ross

35,079 posts

212 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
What I don't understand is we're getting a range of conflicting comments from those who dislike it....

"too compromised as a track car....people buying this should buy a track car instead"

and then we have

"people buying it can't use the full potential, so it's pointless"

Does that make a track car pointless, too?

HighwayStar

4,257 posts

144 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
What I don't understand is we're getting a range of conflicting comments from those who dislike it....

"too compromised as a track car....people buying this should buy a track car instead"

and then we have

"people buying it can't use the full potential, so it's pointless"

Does that make a track car pointless, too?
Yep, all that plus why have the Senna when they can have the Valkyrie, the Project One or whatever... owners even further away from the full potential and pointless. Contradictions used to justify their own arguments.
Person spends lots of money on a car I don’t like... No problem. So a few people cancel because they don’t like the look. One cancelled because decided it would be too costly to repair for Ring track work, bottoming out etc... just means other people who thought they lost out can now get one.
What people are saying is basically they don’t like the car, the look etc and if they had the money they’d by something else. Well that’s happens everyday. Getting worked up about someone else buying a car they wouldn’t makes no sense to me.

wtdoom

3,742 posts

208 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Moderators may as well close this forum down and just print articles , differing opinions are apparently out of bounds laugh

hurstg01

2,914 posts

243 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
How many times do you think Ralph Lauren has 'v-maxed' his F1 GTR for example and if the answer is 'never' does it make the car any less desirable?
The answer is indeed 'never'.....

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
fblm said:
Maldini35 said:
....don’t presume to know what McLaren or 99% of its customers think.
There you go. When in doubt just make things up. Pathetic.
By customers I mean those who have ordered a Senna and paid a deposit.


E65Ross

35,079 posts

212 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
wtdoom said:
Moderators may as well close this forum down and just print articles , differing opinions are apparently out of bounds laugh
If you're referring to my comment, your reply doesn't stand ground IMO. I'm not saying people can't have an opinion, but when someone says "it's too quick for the buyer, and it's too compromised as a track car to be properly quick and they should buy a track car instead" that is totally contradictory and daft.

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
fblm said:
Do you work for McLaren?
I’m afraid that is none of your business.
But you certainly shouldn’t presume it’s beyond the realms of possibility.
A lot of people in the industry post on here.


wtdoom

3,742 posts

208 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
If you're referring to my comment, your reply doesn't stand ground IMO. I'm not saying people can't have an opinion, but when someone says "it's too quick for the buyer, and it's too compromised as a track car to be properly quick and they should buy a track car instead" that is totally contradictory and daft.
You can speep at night e65ross , I wasn't referring to you at all

wtdoom

3,742 posts

208 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Maldini35 said:
fblm said:
Do you work for McLaren?
I’m afraid that is none of your business.
But you certainly shouldn’t presume it’s beyond the realms of possibility.
A lot of people in the industry post on here.
It's non of his business if you have no agenda , if you are here battling every criticism while being employed by those being criticised Id find it a little awkward personally speaking .

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Maldini35 said:
fblm said:
Maldini35 said:
... I know a lot of customers who love the look of the car and plenty more who desperately want one...
Do you work for McLaren?
I’m afraid that is none of your business.
But you certainly shouldn’t presume it’s beyond the realms of possibility.
A lot of people in the industry post on here.
Indeed it's none of my business so feel free not to answer. Not a no then. hehe

QuartzDad

2,251 posts

122 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
I honestly think it looks really good.

And yes, I am officially [partially] sighted coolsmile

Goldenballs13

96 posts

120 months

Friday 9th February 2018
quotequote all
Having now seen one in person, I must say the proportions are a lot nicer than they look in photos. Far from being drop dead gorgeous, but it really does look awesome in person.

robinessex

11,058 posts

181 months

Sunday 11th February 2018
quotequote all
If you want a track day car, far more exciting, and a lot cheaper !!

https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/motorsport...

Enjoy!!

Plug Life

978 posts

91 months

Sunday 11th February 2018
quotequote all
It's a good example of screwing up a nice car (720S) with overdriven aero stuff resulting "purposely fragmented" design.

E65Ross

35,079 posts

212 months

Sunday 11th February 2018
quotequote all
robinessex said:
If you want a track day car, far more exciting, and a lot cheaper !!

https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/motorsport...

Enjoy!!
And if you want a car that can be used on the road, as Flemke intends to use his?

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Sunday 11th February 2018
quotequote all
Goldenballs13 said:
Having now seen one in person, I must say the proportions are a lot nicer than they look in photos. Far from being drop dead gorgeous, but it really does look awesome in person.
eek Pistonheaders in jumping to angry conclusions before actually seeing a car in the metal shocker.

Once you lived through the knicker wetting tantrums of the E60 5 series, then watched the haters buy them you can predict the same reaction on every new car thread.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 11th February 2018
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
And if you want a car that can be used on the road...
Then why do you care about every last 1/1000 of a second being shaved off its undisclosed lap times at the expense of an 'unfragmented' design?