RE: BMW M4 Convertible '30 Jahre Edition'

RE: BMW M4 Convertible '30 Jahre Edition'

Author
Discussion

AppleJuice

2,154 posts

86 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
unsprung said:
"What's that? A 1000 Jahre Edition, you say?"

rofl

AppleJuice

2,154 posts

86 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
^ You started it, unsprung ^

moffat

1,020 posts

226 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
I'm looking forward to the day when BMW go back to soft tops rather than hard top convertibles. The E46 330Ci was a great car to look at.

An extra 200-300kg for a folding hard top on a 'sports car' is not ideal.

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
moffat said:
I'm looking forward to the day when BMW go back to soft tops rather than hard top convertibles. The E46 330Ci was a great car to look at.

An extra 200-300kg for a folding hard top on a 'sports car' is not ideal.
155kg actually 1595kg Vs 1750kg

For interest, the E46 was 1525kg Vs 1655kg

Ergo, the hard roof has only a 25kg penalty. Or less than half a tank of fuel. Or less than the amount a fat lad weighs more compared to a skinny lad.

julian64

14,317 posts

255 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
PHMatt said:
julian64 said:
Having had a little experience of trying BMW cabs and hard tops I wouldn't say there is a little difference between the two. I would say its like driving a completely different car dynamic wise. I'm afraid I would never pay the premium for a 'sporty' cab, just buy a standard cab because the 'sporty' money is wasted
So you think lopping the roof off an M4 makes it less sporty than a 318 SE hard top?
In a straight line, no.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
I habe to agree with some of the comments from earlier.

Have just sold an M4 Comp Pack convertible which I would say is the least enjoyable performance car I have yet owned.

It was decent convertible but a poor M car. The weight isn't the major issue, it's the steering feel (or lack of it) and suspension settings.

It's handsome beast with the roof down but a 440I would be just as good day to day I suspect. Not something you can say when comparing the tintop equivalents.


va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
Looks amazing, my new semi-realistic dream car cloud9

Philv8s

546 posts

125 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
Remember the old adage. If the the roof goes down the price goes up!
Personally I like the choice and after my first roof down trip of the year on the school run(at my sons request) I can see why.

HardMiles

319 posts

87 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
Jual Mass Flywheel said:
GTEYE said:
M1C said:
Tuvra said:
I'm a fan of the BMW M4, however, the other day I was parked next to a Silverstone II Cab with the roof up and all I could think is "the roof line isn't right", I don't like it. Like the other poster here, I couldn't give a hoot about the loss of rigidity, added weight etc, to my eyes the roof totally spoilt the look so I'd never consider the cab. It's noticeable in photos but in the flesh its more obvious to my eyes:-


I'm sure the roof joints just draw my eyes to the area and spoils the "visual flow" of the car frown
Totally agree. The convertible looks nice enough with roof down and the open to the elements thing + extra sounds etc would be great...but with the roof up it just looks wrong.

The coupe is so much nicer smile
The rear window needs to be less raked or it would never fold up into the boot.

I think they actually did a decent job - and whilst it may not look as rakish as the coupe - it was always going to have to be a bit of a compromise - it still looks better than a big expanse of folded fabric IMHO anyway.

Maybe I'm biased as I have an E93 cabrio - but you do get 2 cars in one - roof up its as refined as the normal coupe - but roof down in summer is quite special.
I think it's the boot on the cab. It seems much flatter and doesn't flow down from the rear screen.
Couldn’t agree more with the original post. I’ve thought this with most modern cars. They just lose the flowing lines and get a fat arse!

Even the 993 looks miles better as a coupe than a cab & that came out a while ago!

WJNB

2,637 posts

162 months

Tuesday 20th February 2018
quotequote all
Over over under steer said:
Personal preference alert...

For road use I'd always go for the convertible version of a sports car. I prefer the heightened exposure to the elements which just makes the drive feel like more of an event. I accept that there might be some compromise to chassis rigidity but for road use I couldn't care less.
Well said. So many have delusions as they prop up the bar pontificating about their ability to perceive the structural & handling differences imagining they are professional testers & drivers.

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
AppleJuice said:
^ You started it, unsprung ^
"We did not start it." laugh

HRCM

70 posts

90 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
30 years of convertibles but still no room for estates in the line up.

Iceicebsby1980

101 posts

99 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
There's a image thing for me associated with convertibles . I remember about 10 years ago every one I saw on the road . Had a middle aged man with a bald head driving one . On hot summers days I used to think hope you've applied your sun cream . Then you'd get the plonker driving one in the middle of winter with the roof down . Also can't understand in this country with our weather . Why would want to take the roof of a performance car and jepordise the handling . Then you've got everyone else who drives a peogeot convertible etc who thinks there cool lol . But a extra 10k for a plaque and a individual coulor bargain .

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
Iceicebsby1980 said:
Then you'd get the plonker driving one in the middle of winter with the roof down
Heaters are fitted, y'know.

A day like some of the recent ones - sunny, but crisp - is perfect roof-off weather.

iceicebsby1980 said:
Also can't understand in this country with our weather
The roof closes when it rains.

iceicebsby1980 said:
Why would want to take the roof of a performance car and jepordise the handling
Not every convertible is a tubby, floppy compromise of a thing. And, even then, you really can't get even remotely close to the edges of the handling in something like an M4 on the road without driving like the most raging of bell-ends.

Mind you, my opinion may not be mainstream, since I'm somebody who commuted in one of these all year round... (except my sidescreens were largely tape, and I never had an upper tailgate)

Iceicebsby1980

101 posts

99 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
If you think you look good driving a m4 with the top down in the middle of winter. Each to there own I suppose . I've owned a m3 in the past as you can probably gues it wasn't a convertible and coment about the roof closes when it rains . I didn't know that I'm of to classifieds now to look at buying one .

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

127 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
Iceicebsby1980 said:
If you think you look good driving a m4 with the top down in the middle of winter.
Why on earth would "what others might think you look like" affect how you choose what car to drive?

Iceicebsby1980

101 posts

99 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
I don't m8 my current car wrx sti . Hardly in fashion are they anymore . People prob think I'm a chav for driving one don't care love the car. Just my problem with convertibles is look at me I can fold the roof down on my car and in most cases fk the handling arnt I good lol

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
HRCM said:
30 years of convertibles but still no room for estates in the line up.
Because they are a dying breed?

Why launch something that is seeing diminishing demand? Like it or not, the world is dumping Estate Cars and going to SUVs.

The dafter move, IMO, is Audi not doing RS Saloons for most of its range.

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
Iceicebsby1980 said:
If you think you look good driving a m4 with the top down in the middle of winter. Each to there own I suppose . I've owned a m3 in the past as you can probably gues it wasn't a convertible and coment about the roof closes when it rains . I didn't know that I'm of to classifieds now to look at buying one .
Actually, driving a convertible on a cold but sunny is fantastic.

culpz

4,884 posts

113 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
I'm a fan of the BMW M4, however, the other day I was parked next to a Silverstone II Cab with the roof up and all I could think is "the roof line isn't right", I don't like it. Like the other poster here, I couldn't give a hoot about the loss of rigidity, added weight etc, to my eyes the roof totally spoilt the look so I'd never consider the cab. It's noticeable in photos but in the flesh its more obvious to my eyes:-


I'm sure the roof joints just draw my eyes to the area and spoils the "visual flow" of the car frown
I'm glad someone else noticed this. I see one near my way that's convertible and it simply doesn't look right to me at all. I know many hard-top cars may suffer the same but it really ruins the look of the M4 for me.