RE: Jaguar's 400hp electric SUV unveiled

RE: Jaguar's 400hp electric SUV unveiled

Author
Discussion

jjwilde

1,904 posts

97 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Apparently the price does not include the ~£5k grant so it's cheaper that it is listed at.

I think it looks superb. They have ticked a lot of boxes here and for a first attempt - hell for any attempt - this is an excellent EV. I wonder how it performs on a track? They've had them at tracks with camo on a few times so obviously it's engineered for it... that is somewhere it could kill the modelX.

kambites

67,642 posts

222 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
How is a car roughly the size of the model-3 going to kill the model-x?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
David87 said:
Makes the Model X look a bit silly.
It has the potential to make the Model X look a bit silly. Who knows?

Plug Life

978 posts

92 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
tankplanker said:
I'd be highly surprised if a car advertised with a 300 mile range could actually achieve 200 miles. It'd either have to be amazingly cold or you'd have to be driving the car like you stole it.
10℉, headwind, snow on the road, heavyweight mother-in-law riding shotgun...

tankplanker

2,479 posts

280 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Plug Life said:
10?, headwind, snow on the road, heavyweight mother-in-law riding shotgun...
So, as I said, amazingly cold.

kambites

67,642 posts

222 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Worth noting that these new cars are being quoted WLTP not NEDC so they shouldn't be as unrealistic in terms of range as older EVs.

DonkeyApple

55,594 posts

170 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Condi said:
The future ideally lies in cars connected to chargers when not in use, as this will allow them to draw from the grid when power is cheap, and discharge back to the grid when power is expensive. If you come back from work at 6pm, with 50% battery left, you can afford to sell 25% of that to the grid when power is expensive, say between 7pm and 9pm, then recharge at 1am when power is cheap, giving you 100% to start the day with.
Absolutely. I think there is an issue with not all properties being able to sell power back. A chap did a television program about trying to do this for his village and he was explaining to me at Christmas that they weren’t able to do so.

But, there is total logic in plugging your car in to the house at the conventional time that most humans get home, powering your house during this peak cost period using your car and then refilling your car at the cheapest time much later on.

Everyone becomes a little Enron, arbitraging domestic electricity costs. biggrin

But it will also give rise to Yorkshireman just popping round for a cup of tea and asking if you mind plugging their EV in for a bit. wink

B17NNS

18,506 posts

248 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
hyphen said:
Are these expected to be bought rather than leased? If not, won't it just be mainly base spec in demand for lowest monthly amount.
Have you seen the wheels (castors) on the base spec. You've got to spend £1600 minimum for it to not look silly. Want the same wheels with a diamond turned finish, that'll be £2400. 22" is a £4k option.

CTE

1,488 posts

241 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
I don`t think anyone has a clue about how much copper cabling will be required to transit the power to a sufficient network of recharging points to make these things anywhere near viable.

At present, when your fuel gauge is low, you pop into a service station and fill up...takes 5 minutes. The current status with EV`s is what 45 mins to 80% charge. Now I accept you can get round this by more careful planning etc, but I do not think this is the future...it is currently a backward step. All this is doing is moving the point of emissions from the vehicle to the power station. Domestic houses could of course have solar cells fitted to make it more viable, but some massive leaps in technology are still required.

Oh yes and no-one wants to talk about the emissions created producing the batteries and shipping the raw materials. All the politicians sprout how wonderful it is because the vehicle is electric and zero emissions...and the uneducated lap it up. Also in the background, the taxation system will change form fuel duty to pay per mile. No problem with creating cleaner vehicles by the way...just this is not the solution.


kambites

67,642 posts

222 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
hyphen said:
Are these expected to be bought rather than leased? If not, won't it just be mainly base spec in demand for lowest monthly amount.
Have you seen the wheels (castors) on the base spec. You've got to spend £1600 minimum for it to not look silly. Want the same wheels with a diamond turned finish, that'll be £2400. 22" is a £4k option.
Hmm, I actually rather like the default 18 inch wheel option. 20 inch works but the designs are all horrible. 22 inch wheels look stupid.

I just specced one up to the sort of level I'd probably want and ended up just under £71k. That's without leather seats, which would add another nearly £5k - nice but not worth that to me.

stuckmojo

2,985 posts

189 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
kambites said:
Hmm, I actually rather like the default 18 inch wheel option. 20 inch works but the designs are all horrible. 22 inch wheels look stupid.

I jsut specced one up to the sort of level I'd probably go for and ended up just under £71k. That's without leather seats, which would add another nearly £5k.
Same here. Had a play with the configurator and it's well over £70k for acceptable spec for a car of this calibre. Very nice it is, though.

swisstoni

17,093 posts

280 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
There’s a certain religiosity about some EV proponents it seems to me.
In the sense that the merest doubts as to it all being great in the short term are treated as some sort of challenge to the whole idea.

I have no doubt it’s the future and I’ll have one when it suits me. (I want to fulfil my childhood fantasy of whiring along like Ed Straker).

But practical issues are there and will be for some time.
So relax - it’s coming. Just don’t expect everyone to clap along just yet.

Evoquative

135 posts

99 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
CTE said:
I don`t think anyone has a clue about how much copper cabling will be required to transit the power to a sufficient network of recharging points to make these things anywhere near viable.

At present, when your fuel gauge is low, you pop into a service station and fill up...takes 5 minutes. The current status with EV`s is what 45 mins to 80% charge. Now I accept you can get round this by more careful planning etc, but I do not think this is the future...it is currently a backward step. All this is doing is moving the point of emissions from the vehicle to the power station. Domestic houses could of course have solar cells fitted to make it more viable, but some massive leaps in technology are still required.

Oh yes and no-one wants to talk about the emissions created producing the batteries and shipping the raw materials. All the politicians sprout how wonderful it is because the vehicle is electric and zero emissions...and the uneducated lap it up. Also in the background, the taxation system will change form fuel duty to pay per mile. No problem with creating cleaner vehicles by the way...just this is not the solution.
At present your house doesn't have a petrol pump, but it does have a plug. You start each journey in your petrol or diesel with the same amount of fuel you had at the end of the last journey in an EV it is always more. You will almost never arrive home empty with 2-300 miles of range and so your car will almost always be fully charged when you leave. Few people do journeys over 200 miles all the time, yes there are exceptions, but those people are the outliers.

I commute 150 miles round trip per day and I will get buying an EV soon as it will save me a fortune in fuel an maintenance while providing a relaxing quiet environment to sit in.

The power station as you put it is getting cleaner, grid emissions in the UK are going down each year and wind, solar etc. are taking increasingly large chunks. Currently we turn wind turbines off at night on a regular basis due to a lack of demand, EVs create that demand and you can time them to take advantage of cheaper rates that will come with smart meters.

Making batteries does use more energy than building a normal car, but zero emissions at point of use and electricity that gets cleaner every year means that is massively outweighed by usage emissions.

hyphen

26,262 posts

91 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
hyphen said:
Are these expected to be bought rather than leased? If not, won't it just be mainly base spec in demand for lowest monthly amount.
Have you seen the wheels (castors) on the base spec. You've got to spend £1600 minimum for it to not look silly. Want the same wheels with a diamond turned finish, that'll be £2400. 22" is a £4k option.
JLR by their own admission said they got the price wrong on the Velar, and so no one wanted one. They then were more flexible and orders came in.

If this doesn't sell, Im sure the price will be adjusted.

rsbmw

3,464 posts

106 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
kambites said:
Hmm, I actually rather like the default 18 inch wheel option. 20 inch works but the designs are all horrible. 22 inch wheels look stupid.

I jsut specced one up to the sort of level I'd probably go for and ended up just under £71k. That's without leather seats, which would add another nearly £5k.
Saw an F-Pace on 22's the other day, they look fking ridiculous.

£71k car with no leather seats is a bit silly.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

248 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
rsbmw said:
Saw an F-Pace on 22's the other day, they look fking ridiculous.

£71k car with no leather seats is a bit silly.
The 20's are the pick of the bunch IMO. Can't see many selling with the 18's. Agree about the leather. A £70k Jag should have leather as standard.

Condi

17,299 posts

172 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Evoquative said:
CTE said:
I don`t think anyone has a clue about how much copper cabling will be required to transit the power to a sufficient network of recharging points to make these things anywhere near viable.

At present, when your fuel gauge is low, you pop into a service station and fill up...takes 5 minutes. The current status with EV`s is what 45 mins to 80% charge. Now I accept you can get round this by more careful planning etc, but I do not think this is the future...it is currently a backward step. All this is doing is moving the point of emissions from the vehicle to the power station. Domestic houses could of course have solar cells fitted to make it more viable, but some massive leaps in technology are still required.

Oh yes and no-one wants to talk about the emissions created producing the batteries and shipping the raw materials. All the politicians sprout how wonderful it is because the vehicle is electric and zero emissions...and the uneducated lap it up. Also in the background, the taxation system will change form fuel duty to pay per mile. No problem with creating cleaner vehicles by the way...just this is not the solution.
At present your house doesn't have a petrol pump, but it does have a plug. You start each journey in your petrol or diesel with the same amount of fuel you had at the end of the last journey in an EV it is always more. You will almost never arrive home empty with 2-300 miles of range and so your car will almost always be fully charged when you leave. Few people do journeys over 200 miles all the time, yes there are exceptions, but those people are the outliers.

I commute 150 miles round trip per day and I will get buying an EV soon as it will save me a fortune in fuel an maintenance while providing a relaxing quiet environment to sit in.

The power station as you put it is getting cleaner, grid emissions in the UK are going down each year and wind, solar etc. are taking increasingly large chunks. Currently we turn wind turbines off at night on a regular basis due to a lack of demand, EVs create that demand and you can time them to take advantage of cheaper rates that will come with smart meters.

Making batteries does use more energy than building a normal car, but zero emissions at point of use and electricity that gets cleaner every year means that is massively outweighed by usage emissions.
Totally, the CO2 emissions per kwh have been coming down for years. At this moment in time about 25% of the power is being made by wind, solar or hydro, with a further 15% from nuclear. So 40% is emission free. Unusually I think that all the coal stations are switched on at the moment, because gas prices are so high, but normally coal only makes a tiny contribution to the grid.

http://gridwatch.co.uk/



hyphen

26,262 posts

91 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
stuckmojo said:
So this will be built by Magna Steyr in Graz, alongside the G-Wagen? Want intensifies.

I might actually really want one.
Yes, apparently it is contracted out to Magna Steyr and will be built in Austria.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

248 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
Launch at the factory here...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpyh-4q661g

covmutley

3,039 posts

191 months

Friday 2nd March 2018
quotequote all
CTE said:
I don`t think anyone has a clue about how much copper cabling will be required to transit the power to a sufficient network of recharging points to make these things anywhere near viable.

At present, when your fuel gauge is low, you pop into a service station and fill up...takes 5 minutes. The current status with EV`s is what 45 mins to 80% charge. Now I accept you can get round this by more careful planning etc, but I do not think this is the future...it is currently a backward step. All this is doing is moving the point of emissions from the vehicle to the power station. Domestic houses could of course have solar cells fitted to make it more viable, but some massive leaps in technology are still required.

Oh yes and no-one wants to talk about the emissions created producing the batteries and shipping the raw materials. All the politicians sprout how wonderful it is because the vehicle is electric and zero emissions...and the uneducated lap it up. Also in the background, the taxation system will change form fuel duty to pay per mile. No problem with creating cleaner vehicles by the way...just this is not the solution.
My i3 is a 'bacwards step' sometimes, for 5% of longer journeys it just isnt good at. The rest of the time it is better not having to visit petrol stations any more. 'Fueling' at home is far more convenient.

You are correct that EV's are bad for the environment. But they are better than ICE. The environmental argument is as simple as that.

If I was that bothered about zero emissions I could choose a green tariff or put solar panels on my roof, but being 'green' is not really why I got it.

I am sure you are right about tax. It is currently artificially low to insensitive change. But the cost of EV's will reduce as the tech matures, as happens with all products.

As to whether it is the solution, the car manufacturers clearly think it is. I will take their actions over your opinions.